- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

James webb tele proving big bang theory probably is inaccurate
Posted on 9/8/22 at 6:49 pm
Posted on 9/8/22 at 6:49 pm
LINK
You tube link, 12 min watch funny the telescope they built to prove it is actually refuting it with it's discoveries.
You tube link, 12 min watch funny the telescope they built to prove it is actually refuting it with it's discoveries.
Posted on 9/8/22 at 7:06 pm to burke985
Wrong. The jest has not proven or even suggested the Big Bang theory is wrong. What it did do was show that, gasp, things happened slightly different that predictions. This is the norm. Scientist go to work to fit models to observations.
Bunch of stupid articles on this subject misrepresenting the truth due to ignorance,
Bunch of stupid articles on this subject misrepresenting the truth due to ignorance,
Posted on 9/8/22 at 7:09 pm to omegaman66
quote:yeah cuz without that precious big bang, we might have to give credit to a creator.
Wrong. The jest has not proven or even suggested the Big Bang theory is wrong.
Posted on 9/8/22 at 7:11 pm to prattalumni
quote:
yeah cuz without that precious big bang, we might have to give credit to a creator.
I’ll never understand why these two things are seemingly mutually exclusive to so many people.
If you believe in God, why the frick could he not have acted through the Big Bang/evolution, etc, [insert your scientific theory here]? The existence of one does not prevent the other from also being true.
Unless you’re one of the literal/textualist creationists that thinks everything was created in six days. Then you’re just an idiot.
This post was edited on 9/8/22 at 7:12 pm
Posted on 9/8/22 at 7:11 pm to prattalumni
Creator could have used a Big Bang, or not. Does it matter? Still fascinating.
Posted on 9/8/22 at 7:12 pm to burke985
Yeah, no. That isn’t what it shows at all.
Posted on 9/8/22 at 7:14 pm to omegaman66
quote:
Wrong. The jest has not proven or even suggested the Big Bang theory is wrong. What it did do was show that, gasp, things happened slightly different that predictions. This is the norm. Scientist go to work to fit models to observations.
Nobody obviously knows what's wrong or right so I'm sure you don't either. Everything has a creator if you believe that space just happened you believe in magic also.
Posted on 9/8/22 at 7:15 pm to Indefatigable
I never, NEVER agree with you but we are on the exact same page here. I’ll never understand why some people of faith refuse to think about what the hand of God in action might look like. It’s similar to those who don’t believe in extra terrestrial life but do believe in the angels of the Bible.
Posted on 9/8/22 at 7:15 pm to burke985
because it's fricking stupid. 

Posted on 9/8/22 at 7:16 pm to burke985
min watch funny the telescope they built to prove it is actually refuting it with it's discoveries.
How is that funny? The Big Bang is simply an attempt to explain what we do not fully understand.
How is that funny? The Big Bang is simply an attempt to explain what we do not fully understand.
Posted on 9/8/22 at 7:16 pm to burke985
Can’t go to moon but can do this stuff.
Posted on 9/8/22 at 7:17 pm to burke985
Narrator has an English accent, so he's got to be right.
Posted on 9/8/22 at 7:19 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
Unless you’re one of the literal/textualist creationists that thinks everything was created in six days
Relativity has proven how for God 6 days could epochs here. Both things can be true - even Peter says a day is like 1000 years to God. Time is relative and the farther away you are the bigger the time differential
This post was edited on 9/8/22 at 7:24 pm
Posted on 9/8/22 at 7:20 pm to Ancient Astronaut
quote:
How is that funny? The Big Bang is simply an attempt to explain what we do not fully understand.
It's funny because according to some people the big bang is irrefutable yet here we are seeing evidence of their theory being debunked. Maybe the big bang was just a huge star going supernova and really had no influence of the maturity of space. Maybe space was always just there. Maybe the way we measure travel in space is not like jumping into a time machine and it's just space that's always been there. One thing for sure is this brings a lot of new questions to the table
Posted on 9/8/22 at 7:21 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:Banging is how most life is created.
Creator could have used a Big Bang, or not.
Posted on 9/8/22 at 7:21 pm to burke985
Simulation Theory crushes both Big Bang and Evolution.
Posted on 9/8/22 at 7:22 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
Unless you’re one of the literal/textualist creationists that thinks everything was created in six days. Then you’re just an idiot.
There is no need to be a smug, smarmy a-hole about it.
Posted on 9/8/22 at 7:24 pm to TrueTiger
Simulation theory is basically atheists saying there is a God (intelligent design) without saying it.
Posted on 9/8/22 at 7:26 pm to burke985
Yep, I’m one of those who believe God created the everything in 6 literal days and a young earth.
There is no way to rationalize the scriptures with evolution. The biblical account shows the first man and woman lived between 6000-10,000 years ago counting back generations and ages given in the Bible.
Death didn’t occur until mankind sinned so the fossil records with many layers of dead animals couldn’t have occurred over millions of years. There is another explanation- a worldwide flood in Noah’s day.
There are many scientists who believe in a young earth and refute evolution. The difference is that they look at the same data, but through a worldview that assumes a creator. The evolutionist almost exclusively have an atheist worldview.
There is no way to rationalize the scriptures with evolution. The biblical account shows the first man and woman lived between 6000-10,000 years ago counting back generations and ages given in the Bible.
Death didn’t occur until mankind sinned so the fossil records with many layers of dead animals couldn’t have occurred over millions of years. There is another explanation- a worldwide flood in Noah’s day.
There are many scientists who believe in a young earth and refute evolution. The difference is that they look at the same data, but through a worldview that assumes a creator. The evolutionist almost exclusively have an atheist worldview.
Posted on 9/8/22 at 7:26 pm to NashvilleTider
quote:
Simulation theory is basically atheists saying there is a God (intelligent design) without saying it.
Exactly. And what boundaries would the Creator have? How could we possible know for sure what he is capable of?
Popular
Back to top
