Started By
Message
locked post

Can someone explain to me how spending billions more, raising taxes will help inflation?

Posted on 7/28/22 at 12:43 pm
Posted by ibldprplgld
Member since Feb 2008
27329 posts
Posted on 7/28/22 at 12:43 pm
I’m not an economist, but I don’t understand how doing more of what got us here will get us out of this mess.

Someone explain this to me like I’m Joe Biden.
Posted by Pvt Hudson
Member since Jan 2013
4691 posts
Posted on 7/28/22 at 12:44 pm to
It doesn’t

/thread
Posted by dakarx
Member since Sep 2018
8140 posts
Posted on 7/28/22 at 12:44 pm to
It's the same way sending $70B to Ukraine was for our safety and security. What part can't you understand?
Posted by dkreller
Laffy
Member since Jan 2009
33402 posts
Posted on 7/28/22 at 12:46 pm to
Well if you keep betting, you’ll eventually win it all back.
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
46038 posts
Posted on 7/28/22 at 12:46 pm to
quote:

Someone explain this to me like I’m Joe Biden.
Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
31269 posts
Posted on 7/28/22 at 12:47 pm to
Spending more won’t for sure. Raising taxes I could see lowering inflation because you’re taking money out of the general supply so it’s not out there trying to buy goods.
Posted by The Maj
Member since Sep 2016
30543 posts
Posted on 7/28/22 at 12:47 pm to
quote:

I don’t understand


When you understand that they have no interest in correcting the inflation and they are intentionally driving this country over the cliff, you will find that this is all by design...
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
51996 posts
Posted on 7/28/22 at 12:47 pm to
It will help a little. While it's true that much of the 350 billion will be more money, which is often inflationary, however, it is creating new goods. Inflation is too much money chasing to few goods. The climate change part seems to be somewhat neutral on that.

The tax part is obviously anti-inflation. I haven't seen the details, but it's possible I will be hurt very badly by that. It doesn't change the fact that it is anti-inflation. Not very much, though.

BTW, Manson killed 9/10 of the BBB bill. The part he killed was the inflationary part, the lavishing of more free money on Democrat voters.
This post was edited on 7/28/22 at 12:50 pm
Posted by LC Baw
Lake Charles, LA
Member since Jan 2021
242 posts
Posted on 7/28/22 at 12:49 pm to
Ya know, the thing
Posted by CelticDog
Member since Apr 2015
42867 posts
Posted on 7/28/22 at 12:51 pm to
it scores neutral.

part of it is a flat tax on company's income of 15%.

currently some major oil companies pay nothing on trillions altogether.

compare trumps tax cut which was not neutral.
This post was edited on 7/28/22 at 1:12 pm
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
109612 posts
Posted on 7/28/22 at 12:51 pm to
quote:

It will help a little. While it's true that much of the 350 billion will be more money, which is often inflationary, however, it is creating new goods. Inflation is too much money chasing to few goods. The climate change part seems to be somewhat neutral on that.


What consumer goods do you see being “created” through this? Wouldn’t this only apply really to consumer goods from an inflation standpoint?
Posted by minister of truth
Somewhere new for 6-12 months
Member since May 2022
1871 posts
Posted on 7/28/22 at 12:51 pm to
Similar to my buddy who swore he had a system at the craps table. Just kept doubling down on the same bet, certain he would eventually win & walk away with more $$. Reality is however he would usually run out of money 1st. The idiots in DC however think they have a never ending money supply & they won’t be affected by their gambling losses
Posted by Lg
Hayden, Alabama
Member since Jul 2011
8480 posts
Posted on 7/28/22 at 12:53 pm to
quote:

but I don’t understand how doing more of what got us here will get us out of this mess.



Neither does our government. But they think we are all stupid, so....
Posted by minister of truth
Somewhere new for 6-12 months
Member since May 2022
1871 posts
Posted on 7/28/22 at 12:53 pm to
In fact they’re betting they will be better off while the “bank” picks up the tab
Posted by TigerMyth36
River Ridge
Member since Nov 2005
40970 posts
Posted on 7/28/22 at 12:53 pm to
It won't. And it will crush and economy that still hasn't fully baked the 1.5% interest rate hike the last 2 Fed Meetings.

Biden is well on his way to replacing Carter as President Stagflation.
Posted by The Maj
Member since Sep 2016
30543 posts
Posted on 7/28/22 at 12:55 pm to
quote:

it scores neutral.




The fact that you even believe this...

:rotflmao: :rotflmao:
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
51996 posts
Posted on 7/28/22 at 1:00 pm to
quote:

What consumer goods do you see being “create

That's a complicated question. The real answer is, why does it have to be consumer goods? The goods I was thinking of are sequestration reservoirs for carbon dioxide and carbon dioxide pipelines. There will be some consumer goods like hydrogen fuel cells, but that doesn't matter when discussing inflation.
Posted by tgerb8
Huntsvegas
Member since Aug 2007
6581 posts
Posted on 7/28/22 at 1:01 pm to
quote:

Can someone explain to me how spending billions more, raising taxes will help inflation?


they left an important moniker off of the title. it's REALLY the inflation reduction act (for Congress) of 2022. they're embezzling money back to their pockets to help with inflation for them.

it'll just make it worse for us plebes.
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
109612 posts
Posted on 7/28/22 at 1:06 pm to
quote:

why does it have to be consumer goods?

You said this:
quote:

Inflation is too much money chasing to few goods.

These are not "goods" that anyone is really "chasing"...
quote:

The goods I was thinking of are sequestration reservoirs for carbon dioxide and carbon dioxide pipelines.

Hence, I'm not seeing how it will possibly affect inflation in any way positively. We are creating money to create goods for which we are creating a purely institutional demand. Seems at best negligible on inflation and more than likely just contributory - especially to the extent that we may be shifting production capabilities away from things for which there may be genuine consumer demands.
This post was edited on 7/28/22 at 1:16 pm
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
78031 posts
Posted on 7/28/22 at 1:06 pm to
What is the "cost" of this bill?

quote:

 The part he killed was the inflationary part, the lavishing of more free money on Democrat voters
I'd bet a significant portion of the money spent as grants to green energy outfits will return to Democrat coffers over the years.
This post was edited on 7/28/22 at 1:29 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram