Started By
Message

re: My wife and I had an abortion. AMA

Posted on 6/25/22 at 1:13 pm to
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
96722 posts
Posted on 6/25/22 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

merciful. I'm just trying to draw awareness to the reality of situations that are brushed aside as "oh, that only like 0.1% of all abortions though."
I can’t remember the exact number, but self defense killings are around this percentage of all killings in America. I’m sure glad they carved this out in the law, and didn’t just say “meh, self defense only accounts for 0.1% of murders so who cares”
Posted by Hulkklogan
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2010
43316 posts
Posted on 6/25/22 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

any sensible state government


High hopes these days
This post was edited on 6/25/22 at 1:14 pm
Posted by BigTimer085
Member since Jun 2022
25 posts
Posted on 6/25/22 at 1:14 pm to
quote:

Nothing that happened last Thursday has changed anything that you just mentioned.

I know, but you are being obtuse if you think yesterday's decision isn't the beginning of a new battle.
Posted by TeaParty
Member since May 2022
935 posts
Posted on 6/25/22 at 1:16 pm to
Yep horrible situation to be in for ya'll and many. Thais why I support the decision for the Dobbs case and reversing RVW at eh federal level. States can carve out and do what ever each state wants to. Or prohibit it all together.
Posted by GreenRockTiger
vortex to the whirlpool of despair
Member since Jun 2020
43444 posts
Posted on 6/25/22 at 1:17 pm to
I’m very sorry for your loss and the terrible decision you had to make.

However, the majority of the people at the abortion clinics are there to get rid of unwanted pregnancies.

I don’t know what to say about how the laws should regulate your experience - there are so many different stories and reasons
Posted by FinleyStreet
Member since Aug 2011
7911 posts
Posted on 6/25/22 at 1:17 pm to
quote:

You do realize you could have just carried the baby and let nature take its course


I know it wasn't explicitly stated but OP is a human male not a seahorse.
Posted by hojo
St. Louis, MO
Member since Mar 2005
1366 posts
Posted on 6/25/22 at 1:17 pm to
quote:

I know, but you are being obtuse if you think yesterday's decision isn't the beginning of a new battle.


And you're being obtuse if you don't think this battle has been ongoing since before Roe v Wade.
This post was edited on 6/25/22 at 1:33 pm
Posted by RileyTime
Gulf Breeze, FL
Member since Oct 2008
6944 posts
Posted on 6/25/22 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

There are hundreds of stories similar to ours on the message board Endingwantedpregnancies.com. they are all tragic, and they all are very hard to read.


There were 630,000 abortions alone in 2021.

While your situation was terrible, you are not the norm. Not even in the 1%.
Posted by Bama Bird
Member since Dec 2011
Member since Mar 2013
19224 posts
Posted on 6/25/22 at 1:18 pm to
The problem now is that there's a huge legislative gap. Both sides have been passing ridiculous virtue signaling bills for 30 years with the expectation that it would never matter. So now we have 9 month abortions legal in some states, and no abortions at all allowed in others. Court made the right call legally in my opinion but there's a huge gap that the state legislators will have to deal with.
Posted by USAFTiger42
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2016
1973 posts
Posted on 6/25/22 at 1:19 pm to
For something as obvious as that nobody should have to fly out of state for such procedure. This world is already cutthroat and I'm not gonna "wait and see" then find out the doctors were right all along and the quality of life is shite.
Posted by RileyTime
Gulf Breeze, FL
Member since Oct 2008
6944 posts
Posted on 6/25/22 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

I know, but you are being obtuse if you think yesterday's decision isn't the beginning of a new battle.


Battle for what? Because just a few months ago the battle was to remove the term mother and make it birthing person because men could also give birth.

So, what is the fricking battle? This whole damn country is a fricking reality show.
Posted by BigTimer085
Member since Jun 2022
25 posts
Posted on 6/25/22 at 1:23 pm to
quote:

Battle for what? Because just a few months ago the battle was to remove the term mother and make it birthing person because men could also give birth.


this is a non sequitur.
Posted by Antonio Moss
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
48360 posts
Posted on 6/25/22 at 1:23 pm to
quote:

I believe there are a multitude of rights that are fundamental but are not explicitly mentioned in the constitution. Our constitution with its very short bill of rights was never intended to be an exclusive and complete list of fundamental rights. The cop out of this court is the premise that if a right isn’t listed it does not exist.


No, it was not intended to be exclusive. However, it was intended to be an exclusive list of federal powers and restrictions. A “right” is nothing more than a limitation of government (whether it be federal, state, etc.) The constitution does not maintain a right to abortion (I.e. a restriction on political subunits) in their restriction of the process.


quote:

It is a matter of objective truth that neither the constitution nor the law at the time of the drafting of the constitution granted personhood to the unborn.


Nor did it envision a system in which women could medically terminate a pregnancy on a whim.

However, it does specifically mention (along with the DOI) a right to life - which limits the government from taking life without due process AND investing the government an interest in protecting life.

The fact that science has evolved to where we now know, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that life beings before birth does not alter that reality.

Your argument is ridiculous on its face. The drafters of the constitution had no concept of digital file keeping but still enshrined your 4th Amendment rights to protect you from the government haphazardly meddling in your affairs. The fact that we have technologically evolved to where “papers” are stored on a hard drive doesn’t change the underlying premise of the right.
Posted by BigTimer085
Member since Jun 2022
25 posts
Posted on 6/25/22 at 1:24 pm to
quote:

While your situation was terrible, you are not the norm. Not even in the 1%.

I understand that. The .1% should have the option easily available though.
Posted by GentleJackJones
Member since Mar 2019
4234 posts
Posted on 6/25/22 at 1:25 pm to
I can cherry pick and share stories where both the mother and the baby had less than a 10% chance of surviving. The parents decided to press forward, and the mother, then birthed the baby at 24 weeks, she survived, and the baby, survived, spent the next 4-5 months in NICU, and is now thriving.

Shall I go into more detail?
This post was edited on 6/25/22 at 1:27 pm
Posted by DatNolaClap
New Orleans
Member since Mar 2015
1844 posts
Posted on 6/25/22 at 1:26 pm to
You cared enough to read and respond to his post. Lol. Look at me. I don’t care so much I’m gonna take time to respond to his thread to show how much I don’t care!
Posted by BigTimer085
Member since Jun 2022
25 posts
Posted on 6/25/22 at 1:28 pm to
No, at the time, we read tons of stories related to our condition. Positive and negative. Whether you agree with it or not, we made an informed decision.
Posted by Antonio Moss
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
48360 posts
Posted on 6/25/22 at 1:28 pm to
quote:

I understand that. The .1% should have the option easily available though.


This will also open one the Pandora’s boxes on this issue. How bleak must the outlook be for an abortion to be allowed? Yours was clearly bleak but what if it is 50% viability? 75%? What if it is 100% viability but with significant handicap?


And just wait until the rape exception box is opened …
Posted by tiger91
In my own little world
Member since Nov 2005
36817 posts
Posted on 6/25/22 at 1:31 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/25/22 at 1:32 pm
Posted by TBoy
Kalamazoo
Member since Dec 2007
24005 posts
Posted on 6/25/22 at 1:32 pm to
quote:

However, it does specifically mention (along with the DOI) a right to life - which limits the government from taking life without due process AND investing the government an interest in protecting life.

That only applies to what was considered a person at the time of the drafting. Unborn had no personhood.
Jump to page
Page First 2 3 4 5 6 ... 20
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 20Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram