- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Instead of NIL, wouldn't it just have been easier to pay college players fixed salaries?
Posted on 12/9/21 at 10:46 pm
Posted on 12/9/21 at 10:46 pm
Pay more to starting players and less to backup and other players in the depth chart. Make it uniform across conferences, or maybe Power 5 conferences get a bigger salary cap compared to the Group of 5 and independent schools. I think that would have been much better than the NIL and the transfer portal and all the other mess we have currently.
21
Posted on 12/9/21 at 10:53 pm to rickgrimes
No. Title ix bruh. Gotta pay em all equally, and I mean ALL athletes equally if school would were to be the payor.
Posted on 12/9/21 at 10:53 pm to rickgrimes
Will never happen. because they would have to pay a Heisman candidate the same as the 3rd string goalie on the soccer team because of title 9.
Posted on 12/9/21 at 11:33 pm to Ponchy Tiger
No, that's the point.
Johnny Manziel was the crux for this. That man made A&M and millions and he couldn't and didn't benefit or get a penny...at least legally.
That is where this all started. So, you have super stars who the college and NCAA were making million off of and they were no better off than the 5th string water boy.
So now that college is effectively the minor league for the NFL, an athelete's status/name/production can now be used by a company for using their likeness.
What you are talking about, every single player for every school for every single sport that is on the roster, regardless of talent they bring to the table, would have to get paid, the same amount......that is equality.
Johnny Manziel was the crux for this. That man made A&M and millions and he couldn't and didn't benefit or get a penny...at least legally.
That is where this all started. So, you have super stars who the college and NCAA were making million off of and they were no better off than the 5th string water boy.
So now that college is effectively the minor league for the NFL, an athelete's status/name/production can now be used by a company for using their likeness.
What you are talking about, every single player for every school for every single sport that is on the roster, regardless of talent they bring to the table, would have to get paid, the same amount......that is equality.
Posted on 12/9/21 at 11:36 pm to oneg8rh8r
quote:
What you are talking about, every single player for every school for every single sport that is on the roster, regardless of talent they bring to the table, would have to get paid, the same amount......that is equality.
And they already got a stipend along with room and board and meals.
No way any small universities could afford to pay 50k to every athlete on top of the scholarships.
Posted on 12/9/21 at 11:40 pm to rickgrimes
This is not what we want.. NIL is the best option. However, it needs some work. Let the market play out.
I know it’s ridiculous but, this is not “the end of college football” Starting a salary would be the end of college football
I know it’s ridiculous but, this is not “the end of college football” Starting a salary would be the end of college football
Posted on 12/10/21 at 12:12 am to OKtiger
85X 50,000 = $4,250.000 All scholarship players .
Posted on 12/10/21 at 12:33 am to rickgrimes
well it’s worked for bama for decades
Posted on 12/10/21 at 6:40 am to rickgrimes
I like the salary idea better. Small monthly amount and bank the rest each year while they are on the team, and they get it when their college career is over ( unless kicked off the team ) Applies only to revenue generating sports. NCAA, the conferences, and NFL (since colleges are the farm system) can all chip in. Keep the players focused on making their team better to generate more revenue, not on finding agents to do ads for car dealers, etc.
Posted on 12/10/21 at 6:51 am to Mr Cell Phone
quote:
85X 50,000 = $4,250.000 All scholarship players .
Now do every single athlete on campus, and not just the ones on scholarship. Also $50,000 isn’t enough for star players. Schools would still be paying under the table for better players
Posted on 12/10/21 at 7:43 am to rickgrimes
Nil was done to undermine the sec.
The non sec schools in big markets now have something to sell the best athletes.
Also, just because a kid can make money legally does not stop kids from getting money illegally. Boosters will still pay kids under the table…
The non sec schools in big markets now have something to sell the best athletes.
Also, just because a kid can make money legally does not stop kids from getting money illegally. Boosters will still pay kids under the table…
This post was edited on 12/10/21 at 9:22 am
Posted on 12/10/21 at 7:46 am to oneg8rh8r
quote:
Johnny Manziel was the crux for this
quote:
That is where this all started.
No it was Ed O Bannon and the lawsuit against EA Sports.
Posted on 12/10/21 at 7:48 am to SlidellCajun
quote:
Nil was done to undermine the sec.
Post less
Posted on 12/10/21 at 8:05 am to rickgrimes
Amateurism died decades ago.
It's dead in the Olympics. It's dead in college.
Corporations and schools are making billions of dollars from college athletics.
Why don't people trust capitalism in college sports?
It's dead in the Olympics. It's dead in college.
Corporations and schools are making billions of dollars from college athletics.
Why don't people trust capitalism in college sports?
Posted on 12/10/21 at 8:23 am to H-Town Tiger
quote:
No it was Ed O Bannon and the lawsuit against EA Sports
On the positive side, the NCAA series of games should be coming out. I haven’t played any type of video game, since that was shelved years ago, I’m ready to play my sons, to see if I can still hang.
This post was edited on 12/10/21 at 8:25 am
Posted on 12/10/21 at 8:27 am to rickgrimes
Pay them all the same as they sign. $3000 per month is plenty. Every athlete who must adhere to the NCAA rules gets $3k. Then allow them to be paid every time they represent the university other than on the field of play. All reported payments should be transparent and the random audits of tax info each school can do will assure there is no “funny” money
Posted on 12/10/21 at 8:44 am to rickgrimes
NIL is the players ability to make money off of their own name, image, and likeness.
This is not controlled by the school or the NCAA in any way except controlling the manner of involvement the school/boosters have.
Part of that is requiring the player actually provides some value to the person/business using the NIL. So a commercial or their name or likeness on flyers, etc.
This is not controlled by the school or the NCAA in any way except controlling the manner of involvement the school/boosters have.
Part of that is requiring the player actually provides some value to the person/business using the NIL. So a commercial or their name or likeness on flyers, etc.
Posted on 12/10/21 at 9:03 am to rickgrimes
Title ix plus that wouldn't really solve anything. They would all get their base salary above the table and their bonuses below it.
Posted on 12/10/21 at 9:05 am to rickgrimes
quote:
Make it uniform across conferences
Sounds like communism.
Posted on 12/10/21 at 9:09 am to rickgrimes
Wouldn't it be great is the NIL was subtracted from their scholarship, thus saving the taxpayers a ton of money.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News