- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 11/11/12 at 8:10 pm to TRUERockyTop
In this order:
1. Auburn
2. Tenn
3. Arky
4. UK
1. Auburn
2. Tenn
3. Arky
4. UK
Posted on 11/11/12 at 8:10 pm to TRUERockyTop
quote:
they're going to be walking into some talent
Based on recruiting rankings you would think so
But the thing is Chiz hasn't developed worth a shite. Those players really are just bad. They weren't out of high school, but there's too much ground for them to make up now
Posted on 11/11/12 at 8:11 pm to VAvolfan
quote:
Tennessee isn't that great of a high school football state.
It's better than Kentucky. Not more the 3-4 D1 talent in the state each year. Part of why UK struggles so bad, no home recruiting base to speak of.
Posted on 11/11/12 at 8:11 pm to TigerStew
quote:
1. Auburn
2. Tenn
3. Arky
4. UK
You really think someone would choose to work under Jay Jacobs over Tennessee and Arkansas?
fricking lol
Posted on 11/11/12 at 8:13 pm to TRUERockyTop
I would pick AU only because i humbly believe that at Auburn i'd have the fastest chance for success. In that profession, especially in the SEC, it's a show me the results fast situation.
Posted on 11/11/12 at 8:13 pm to Gladius Veritas
Whoever any of these teams do get is going to effect there recruiting in a BIG way
Posted on 11/11/12 at 8:14 pm to Gladius Veritas
Ark > Auburn all day with equal coaches.
Posted on 11/11/12 at 8:14 pm to Gladius Veritas
Auburn is in a better recruiting position than UT and Arky.
Ut and Arky must import most of their talent. Kentucky poster said it right.
Ut and Arky must import most of their talent. Kentucky poster said it right.
Posted on 11/11/12 at 8:16 pm to TigerStew
quote:
Auburn is in a better recruiting position than UT and Arky.
I don't deny that
I just think that a lot of people don't consider that having a good AD is very, very important to a coach
Posted on 11/11/12 at 8:16 pm to VAvolfan
quote:You still have a bigger population than Alabama, Kentucky, or Arkansas. Alabama is small, but more importantly, they have to compete in state directly against Bama.
Hell yea it is. UT has to go into everyones back yard to recruit. Tennessee isn't that great of a high school football state.
This post was edited on 11/11/12 at 8:18 pm
Posted on 11/11/12 at 8:18 pm to Gladius Veritas
You are right on the AD thing. I'm not in the know on AD's of other schools. I based my comments on all things being equal.
Posted on 11/11/12 at 8:18 pm to kywildcatfanone
quote:
It's better than Kentucky. Not more the 3-4 D1 talent in the state each year. Part of why UK struggles so bad, no home recruiting base to speak of.
They're both pretty bad.
Posted on 11/11/12 at 8:19 pm to Gladius Veritas
quote:
I just think that a lot of people don't consider that having a good AD is very, very important to a coach
yeah. arkansas has the most stable athletic department of the 3 football schools listed. not saying the makes arkansas the default best option, but i think that has to be taken into account.
This post was edited on 11/11/12 at 8:20 pm
Posted on 11/11/12 at 8:19 pm to Fuzzy
Recruiting comes with winning. If you win they come, I think Fulmer wrote the book on that.
Posted on 11/11/12 at 8:20 pm to TigerStew
quote:
Auburn is in a better recruiting position than UT and Arky.
this. They can field a strong team with Georgia, Alabama and Florida talent alone.
Posted on 11/11/12 at 8:22 pm to TRUERockyTop
Tennessee and Auburn are very attractive. Strong history, fanbases and recruiting bases.
Arky is a very "meh" job. Solid fanbase and facilities, but they will forever be relegated to A&M, Texas, OU and LSU's sloppy fourths and fifths.
UK is death sentence, one of those schools where it is essentially impossible to win longterm.
Arky is a very "meh" job. Solid fanbase and facilities, but they will forever be relegated to A&M, Texas, OU and LSU's sloppy fourths and fifths.
UK is death sentence, one of those schools where it is essentially impossible to win longterm.
Posted on 11/11/12 at 8:23 pm to Fuzzy
quote:
You still have a bigger population than Alabama, Kentucky, or Arkansas
We do have a larger population but when the population isn't delivering large numbers of top talent we have to go to other states.
Popular
Back to top


0






