- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 11/21/25 at 4:27 pm to PortCityTiger82
quote:
He’s likely got a clause like every other coach that reduces his buyout according to his new salary
Kiffin does not have an offset clause in his contract with OM
Posted on 11/21/25 at 4:28 pm to Covingtontiger77
quote:
And then owe him $36m
Which would be immediately offset by his new contract. They’d owe him nothing
Posted on 11/21/25 at 4:28 pm to Covingtontiger77
Buy out is zero if he gets a job earning more than he makes now.
Posted on 11/21/25 at 4:28 pm to Scoob
quote:
Alternate point of view here- it's honestly pretty crappy for the Ole Miss players to lose their head coach in a playoff run, where they may finish regular season 11-1.
Agreement to allow him to finish the regular season lets them achieve that, while the "interim" guys get a head's up and some time to plan on those playoff games. Ole Miss can start looking in earnest, LSU (or Florida) goes to autopilot for a week prepping for the announcement.
Fanbases are the only ones stressing on this timetable, but we will all get over it and continue to support the school of our choice.
Posted on 11/21/25 at 4:29 pm to Covingtontiger77
This doesn’t make any sense. Any future employer would prefer him come on board sooner than later. Letting him continue to coach is a courtesy to him and the school he is currently at.
I don’t see Lane having any interest in playing this card.
And is there no mitigation duty in his buyout?
I don’t see Lane having any interest in playing this card.
And is there no mitigation duty in his buyout?
Posted on 11/21/25 at 4:29 pm to Covingtontiger77
Conduct detrimental to the team? 
Posted on 11/21/25 at 4:29 pm to Maverick14
But they aren’t going to do that. They aren’t putting him on paid leave for a chance to try and make the playoffs.
Posted on 11/21/25 at 4:30 pm to DmitriKaramazov
quote:
Why couldnt he resign, exactly?
Because Lane wants to earn 7th SEC win bonus.
Posted on 11/21/25 at 4:31 pm to Covingtontiger77
Owe him his buyout???
The guy has 2 schools bidding on him right now. It's a sure thing that he will be making more money somewhere else next year and the buyout will be mitigated to the point of not having to pay it. It's as safe of a firing as you could make.
The guy has 2 schools bidding on him right now. It's a sure thing that he will be making more money somewhere else next year and the buyout will be mitigated to the point of not having to pay it. It's as safe of a firing as you could make.
Posted on 11/21/25 at 4:31 pm to lsufball19
quote:
Which would be immediately offset by his new contract. They’d owe him nothing
Again, Kiffin does not have this clause in his contract. If they fire him they owe him the buyout regardless of his next job's salary.
Posted on 11/21/25 at 4:34 pm to Covingtontiger77
Lane has everybody in a pickle. Should change the name of next week’s game to the Deviled Egg Bowl.
This post was edited on 11/21/25 at 4:35 pm
Posted on 11/21/25 at 4:35 pm to WaterLink
quote:
Kiffin does not have this clause in his contract
Ah. Well that's even more reason that OM's AD is a weak little bitch.
Posted on 11/21/25 at 4:35 pm to RemouladeSawce
quote:
They have no grounds for cause
So you fire hin without cause
I am sure future job offsets buy out
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News