- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Ole Miss may have jumped the gun firing Nutt before the end of the year
Posted on 12/2/11 at 12:48 pm to DCRebel
Posted on 12/2/11 at 12:48 pm to DCRebel
quote:
What about our expectations are outrageous?
Being able to compete with the big 6 on a year in and year out basis
quote:
Nutt got two losing seasons before he was canned.
I would have fired his arse too, but he did take yall to back to back cotton bowls
Orgeron should have never been hired
Cutcliffe was super quick
All of the shitty coaching decisions really fall back on Boone
Posted on 12/2/11 at 12:51 pm to DCRebel
quote:
Better facilities.
marginal at best
quote:
Bigger salary
after bonuses- Mullen makes more than Nutt this year...so thats wrong
quote:
Better recruiting classes
not in the 1990's you didnt...this only starting taking place with the demise of Jackie and the hiring of Crooms- our recruiting will be better than Mississippi's the next couple of years- guaranteed...so wrong again
quote:
Better national exposure.
State and Mullen are all over ESPN- they even did a special on us at practice- I missed the one they did with Mississippi...
wrong aGAIN
Posted on 12/2/11 at 12:52 pm to schlow mo
quote:
I would say they are equal jobs, with Ole Miss a lesser job over the last ten years because of their outrageous expectation to go along with their propensity to fire coaches quickly. This is of course outside of Orgeron who was in fact a moron.
I hate Ole Miss as much as the next guy...and Ole Miss will never be a powerhouse. But, relative to Miss St? I don't think you have an accurate perception of where Miss St. falls.
I'm trying to think of a single advantage Miss St. has over Ole Miss.
Money? No.
Recruiting Base? No.
Facilities? Not even close.
What am I missing here? Is it possible you are confusing the strength of the current team with the potential of the program?
Posted on 12/2/11 at 12:55 pm to schlow mo
quote:
Being able to compete with the big 6 on a year in and year out basis
The idea that Ole Miss fans "expect" this is bullshite. Seriously, it's totally made up.
We EXPECT to not lose blowout games to Vanderbilt and Kentucky. We EXPECT to beat Louisiana fricking Tech.
We would like to be a powerhouse, but nobody expects it.
quote:
I would have fired his arse too, but he did take yall to back to back cotton bowls
Oh hey Houston. I didn't know you posted here.
quote:
Orgeron should have never been hired
That's not relevant nor does it answer the question of "does Ole Miss fire coaches too quickly".
Posted on 12/2/11 at 12:57 pm to CoonassBulldog
quote:
marginal at best
In the eyes of Coonass, sure.
quote:
after bonuses- Mullen makes more than Nutt this year...so thats wrong
Bonuses != salary
quote:
not in the 1990's you didnt...this only starting taking place with the demise of Jackie and the hiring of Crooms- our recruiting will be better than Mississippi's the next couple of years- guaranteed...so wrong again
I'm wrong because of your prediction of the future? Yeah, that makes sense.
What happened in the 1990's is hardly relevant to the desireability of our coaching job today. Get that weak shite out of here fatass.
quote:
State and Mullen are all over ESPN- they even did a special on us at practice- I missed the one they did with Mississippi...
At this very moment, yes. But aggregate over the past so many years, nope. Not even close.
Posted on 12/2/11 at 12:57 pm to CoonassBulldog
I don't spew dirrahea all over the board and then pretend like what I said never happened because I was "deceived". Only your disciple Al buys your horseshite pal. Don't expect the rest of us to take seriously.
Posted on 12/2/11 at 12:59 pm to moneyg
quote:
Money? No.
Recruiting Base? No.
Facilities? Not even close.
Don't tell Fatass that! He'll call you crazy!
You know what's hilarious about these threads? It's that, with only a few exceptions, it's ONLY the State fans who stick up for State in the "whose program/job is better" argument. If other SEC fans who hate our guts (as moneyg says he does) are conceding the point that we're the better job/program, then you all should just shut the frick up. It's not nearly as debatable as y'all want it to be.
Is Mississippi State better off now than it was 20, 10, or even 5 years ago. Of course. Is Mississippi State doing great things to improve the program? Absolutely. That doesn't at all mean that your job is one that should be considered "better" than ours or, really, anybody's in the SEC aside from Vanderbilt and maybe Kentucky.
Posted on 12/2/11 at 1:02 pm to moneyg
quote:
Money? No.
Recruiting Base? No.
Facilities? Not even close.
recruiting? only because of Crooms and Mullen rebuilding...3 of their last 5 season they have had two 0-8's and a 1-7- their damn recruiting is a little over-rated
facilities? marginal at best. Seems like someone hasnt been to Starkville in awhile and actually looked around.
Posted on 12/2/11 at 1:02 pm to DMagic
OK - so who sucks less has been vetted pretty exhaustively on here and no one wins - ever. So, back to the real issue. Will y'all be happy with Fedora when they announce tomorrow?
Posted on 12/2/11 at 1:03 pm to Diamondawg
Not really we are in for a rough couple if years.
Posted on 12/2/11 at 1:03 pm to Diamondawg
quote:
OK - so who sucks less has been vetted pretty exhaustively on here and no one wins - ever. So, back to the real issue. Will y'all be happy with BARRY frickING SWITZER when they announce IN FIVE MINUTES?
FTFY
And if we hire Fedora I won't be happy.
Posted on 12/2/11 at 1:07 pm to DCRebel
quote:
You know what's hilarious about these threads? It's that, with only a few exceptions, it's ONLY the State fans who stick up for State in the "whose program/job is better" argumen
All I know is that when we have been at our lowest point- we hired a 2 time national championship winning coordinator- and he was our 2nd offer. We had a coach a week after we started the search
You guys cant get anybody to accept that shitty job. That tells me all I need to know.
But dont let facts like that stand in your way of pushing your 40 year old myths
Posted on 12/2/11 at 1:08 pm to schlow mo
This argument is so fricking retarded. It's a wash. Neither is a top job.
Brad Pitt was great in Merlinsball
Brad Pitt was great in Merlinsball
Posted on 12/2/11 at 1:10 pm to CoonassBulldog
Stop pretending to know about our coaching search. It's obvious to anyone paying attention that you don't know jack shite.
Posted on 12/2/11 at 1:10 pm to CoonassBulldog
Who was being pushed out the door.... You left that part out.
Posted on 12/2/11 at 1:21 pm to CoonassBulldog
quote:
All I know is that when we have been at our lowest point- we hired a 2 time national championship winning coordinator- and he was our 2nd offer. We had a coach a week after we started the search
Yeah, Greg Byrne is a great AD. I think his hire of Rich Rod at 'Zona is a great one. I fully believe that, even if you're at a low point, good leadership can get you out of it.
quote:
You guys cant get anybody to accept that shitty job. That tells me all I need to know.
Alabama and Arkansas' searches dragged on and on and on until they hired Saban and Petrino respectively. I'm okay with our guys being deliberate, assuming that they make the right choice.
quote:
But dont let facts like that stand in your way of pushing your 40 year old myths
Just like you don't let security guards get in your way of the Barnhill's you got kicked out of?
Posted on 12/2/11 at 1:22 pm to NIH
quote:
Brad Pitt was great in Merlinsball
I thought he was much better in Merlins 11. Merlins 12, not so much.
Posted on 12/2/11 at 1:24 pm to Rebelgator
quote:
Merlins 13 was too much...
It was corny, but it was fun. Merlins 12 tried too hard.
Everyone agrees that Merlins 11 is by far the best though, right?
Posted on 12/2/11 at 1:25 pm to DCRebel
Clearly.
Mr. & Mrs. Merlins wasn't too bad either.
Mr. & Mrs. Merlins wasn't too bad either.
Popular
Back to top


2




