- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Is Matt House a 3-4 or a 4-3 guy?
Posted on 12/28/21 at 9:06 pm
Posted on 12/28/21 at 9:06 pm
Also, didn't he coach a few huge names that came out of Kentucky? I forgot who they were
Posted on 12/28/21 at 9:10 pm to DVinBR
Not out of Kentucky but he was credited for developing Aaron Donald at Pitt.
I'm not 100% sure about his defensive scheme but I thought it was a multiples approach not solely a 3-4 or 4-3.
I'm not 100% sure about his defensive scheme but I thought it was a multiples approach not solely a 3-4 or 4-3.
Posted on 12/28/21 at 9:16 pm to DVinBR
Not sure but people put way too much on that. They both equal 11, good players make both successful, it really doesn’t matter. There’s been plenty of shitty 3-4 Ds.
Posted on 12/28/21 at 9:26 pm to DVinBR
quote:
Is Matt House a 3-4 or a 4-3 guy?
Which one is the Joe Brady defense?
Posted on 12/28/21 at 9:27 pm to Tiger Tracker
quote:Pretty sure Josh Allen had one of the best defensive seasons in SEC history under him.
Not out of Kentucky but he was credited for developing Aaron Donald at Pitt.
Posted on 12/28/21 at 9:35 pm to DVinBR
His defense is based on personnel. He'll run what's our strength.
Posted on 12/28/21 at 9:43 pm to MOT
Probably should have phrased my post better. I meant Donald wasn't out of Kentucky. Not that he didn't coach any good players at Kentucky.
Posted on 12/28/21 at 9:52 pm to DVinBR
We need to stop with the 3-4 vs. 4-3 thing.
Virtually every defense in college football now uses three down linemen and a stand-up rush end. Is that a 3-4 or a 4-3? It's a totally semantic argument.
Virtually every defense in college football now uses three down linemen and a stand-up rush end. Is that a 3-4 or a 4-3? It's a totally semantic argument.
Posted on 12/28/21 at 9:56 pm to macaoidh
quote:
three down linemen and a stand-up rush end. Is that a 3-4 or a 4-3?
That would be a 3-4
Posted on 12/28/21 at 9:59 pm to macaoidh
quote:
Virtually every defense in college football now uses three down linemen and a stand-up rush end. Is that a 3-4 or a 4-3? It's a totally semantic argument.
Try telling Ed Orgeron that.
Posted on 12/28/21 at 10:05 pm to DVinBR
Can’t be a 4-3, that was what killed our defense, allegedly.
Posted on 12/28/21 at 10:18 pm to macaoidh
quote:
Virtually every defense in college football now uses three down linemen and a stand-up rush end. Is that a 3-4 or a 4-3? It's a totally semantic argument.
Mmm, I’m not sure it’s just semantics when you’re recruiting. Especially when it comes to DL. You’ve got to convince the Mason Smith’s of the world that while he won’t rack up the stats as a 3-4 DE that he might as a 4-3 DT, that versatility will make him a shite ton of money in the NFL. And 3-4 noses are harder to find—specially in LA—than 4-3 DTs. I think you have to be able to run a 3-4 and 4-3–be multiple—to stop all the teams on the schedule. But I do think you need a good communicator of the long-term benefits of the 3-4 to more easily recruit DL.
Posted on 12/28/21 at 10:21 pm to DVinBR
He runs a whatever best fits the players we have and the opponents we play.
Posted on 12/28/21 at 10:39 pm to Hot Carl
quote:
I think you have to be able to run a 3-4 and 4-3–be multiple—to stop all the teams on the schedule. But I do think you need a good communicator of the long-term benefits of the 3-4 to more easily recruit DL.
You can blur these lines even further when you start talking about a 1 gap 2-4 vs a 2 gap. A 1 gap scheme doesn’t depend on having a space eater who can take on 2 blocks at DT. That’s what we ran often early in Aranda’s tenure as we transitioned to the new scheme.
A guy like Smith may not be as limited playing DE in a 1 gap scheme, especially playing opposite of the rush LB/DE. This works much more like a traditional 4-3 and would make it easier to be multiple in alignment.
This post was edited on 12/28/21 at 10:41 pm
Posted on 12/28/21 at 10:46 pm to misey94
Agreed, but you need a guy who can sell that. Hopefully House can, and it’s no big deal. I do think it was easier to recruit LBers under Aranda than it was DL. Maybe that was on O, though.
Posted on 12/28/21 at 10:50 pm to Hot Carl
Didn’t he coach Bud Dupree too?
Posted on 12/29/21 at 6:27 am to DVinBR
quote:
Is Matt House a 3-4 or a 4-3 guy?
Don't really care and would prefer if he's a multiple kinda guy to fit what we're working with.
As long as public opinion doesn't sway him like it did with ed, we'll be fine.
Posted on 12/29/21 at 2:18 pm to deuce985
quote:
His defense is based on personnel. He'll run what's our strength.
Didn't we have a guy like that? He was pretty good. Think he is a head coach in Texas somewhere.
Popular
Back to top

10






