- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The House should impeach the 5 justices who voted for Birthright Citizenship
Posted on 7/1/26 at 10:25 am
Posted on 7/1/26 at 10:25 am
Mic drop 
I’d settle for Roberts and Barrett. The Michigan senator who helped write the 14th Amendment clearly stated it was not intended for birthright citizenship. Anybody ruling otherwise should not be a judge to allow such a insane policy.
LINK
Fun fact
In 1804 the House impeached Supreme Court Justice Sam “No beer” Chase
I’d settle for Roberts and Barrett. The Michigan senator who helped write the 14th Amendment clearly stated it was not intended for birthright citizenship. Anybody ruling otherwise should not be a judge to allow such a insane policy.
LINK
Fun fact
In 1804 the House impeached Supreme Court Justice Sam “No beer” Chase
This post was edited on 7/1/26 at 11:01 am
9
Posted on 7/1/26 at 10:26 am to jb4
They're unimpeachable, man.
Posted on 7/1/26 at 10:27 am to tarzana
quote:
They're unimpeachable, man.
So the Black Robes in reality are running the nation?
Posted on 7/1/26 at 10:28 am to jb4
Crap, should have impeached and convicted the entire prior administration for the border.
Posted on 7/1/26 at 10:37 am to tarzana
quote:
They're unimpeachable, man.
Ahhh another day another wholly incorrect statement by this Marxist twat.
Posted on 7/1/26 at 10:38 am to Bass Tiger
quote:
So the Black Robes in reality are running the nation?
No, they're telling you what the law currently is instead of shifting it to their or the administrations policy preferences. Almost every major decision for the past two decades effectively begs Congress to do its job and stop relying on the courts to parse out its shitty/ancient legislation in a modern context.
I don't want nine people trying to adjust old laws to modern contexts. I want legislation that updates those laws and their application when the need arises or the situation changes.
This post was edited on 7/1/26 at 10:40 am
Posted on 7/1/26 at 10:44 am to jb4
absolutely should but congress is never interested in actually fixing things.
Posted on 7/1/26 at 11:08 am to Indefatigable
quote:
So the Black Robes in reality are running the nation?
No, they're telling you what the law currently is instead of shifting it to their or the administrations policy preferences. Almost every major decision for the past two decades effectively begs Congress to do its job and stop relying on the courts to parse out its shitty/ancient legislation in a modern context.
I don't want nine people trying to adjust old laws to modern contexts. I want legislation that updates those laws and their application when the need arises or the situation changes.
Gotcha. I'm sure these Black Robes are not allowing any of their political beliefs to cloud their opinions.
Posted on 7/1/26 at 11:10 am to jb4
quote:What crime did they commit?
The House should impeach the 5 justices who voted for Birthright Citizenship
Posted on 7/1/26 at 11:11 am to Indefatigable
quote:
I don't want nine people trying to adjust old laws to modern contexts. I want legislation that updates those laws and their application when the need arises or the situation changes.
and you want Chinese spies running amok because the democrats will never vote for anything to stop them from birthing trips
Just say it and stop leaning on the democrats.
Posted on 7/1/26 at 11:13 am to Indefatigable
quote:
I don't want nine people trying to adjust old laws to modern contexts.
Yep. Ypu could kiss the first two amendments gone. Reall 4th too, no way the FF considered digital encryption. Surely they would be for giving government access to everything. We can do this all day.
MAGA seal clappers don’t want the “cure” they think they want.
Posted on 7/1/26 at 11:14 am to jb4
TBH, there is only one justice that really deserves to be impeached no matter how partisan or bad some of their arguments are. It’s KBJ.
The others are at least practicing law. They at least need an argument. Granted I don’t agree with a lot of them, such as the BRC case. That doesn’t mean we should just impeach them all.
The others are at least practicing law. They at least need an argument. Granted I don’t agree with a lot of them, such as the BRC case. That doesn’t mean we should just impeach them all.
Posted on 7/1/26 at 11:16 am to RohanGonzales
quote:
and you want Chinese spies running amok because the democrats will never vote for anything to stop them from birthing trips
Just say it and stop leaning on the democrats.
What the frick are you talking about?
The Chinese have been spying and robbing us blind for decades, just like the Soviets before them. Birthright citizenship isn't even close to the largest reason we've made that easy for them. Our universities and industries did that all on their lonesome.
Posted on 7/1/26 at 11:16 am to Taxing Authority
quote:
What crime did they commit?
They don't need to have committed a crime. Being derelict in your duty to uphold the constitution is plenty grounds for impeaching a justice. For violation of their judicial oath.
It has happened in the past, actually. For these exact reasons.
Posted on 7/1/26 at 11:17 am to Indefatigable
This is correct.
Posted on 7/1/26 at 11:20 am to tarzana
quote:
They're unimpeachable, man.
Jesus you're fricking stupid. You know, most people tend to shy away from talking about shite they don't know anything about, but these days and on the internet it's even worse when you have things like AI and Google at your fingertips. A 2 second internet search could set you straight on this before you run your mouth and look like a fricking fool.
Posted on 7/1/26 at 11:24 am to BoarEd
quote:Except none of that happened. Disagreeing with a ruling isn’t grounds for impeachment. Hell, it’s why the lifetime appointment exists to begin with.
Being derelict in your duty to uphold the constitution is plenty grounds for impeaching a justice. For violation of their judicial oath.
Y’all sound like a democrats. Next w’all will want trump to pack the court, too.
Posted on 7/1/26 at 11:26 am to Taxing Authority
quote:
Y’all sound like a democrats.
I didn't say I wanted it to happen. I was setting you straight as to what constitutes grounds for impeachment of a justice. A crime is not necessary.
Why are there so many fricking idiots around here?
This post was edited on 7/1/26 at 11:27 am
Posted on 7/1/26 at 11:32 am to BoarEd
quote:
I didn't say I wanted it to happen.
Fair enough. I mistakenly thought you were the OP.
quote:We can argue what the Good Behavior clause definition is, but it’s clearly not “I disagree with the ruling”.
I was setting you straight as to what constitutes grounds for impeachment of a justice. A crime is not necessary.
quote:seemingly you could provide us the answer?
Why are there so many fricking idiots around here?
I keed, I keed. Posted on 7/1/26 at 11:39 am to Taxing Authority
quote:
We can argue what the Good Behavior clause definition is, but it’s clearly not “I disagree with the ruling”.
I mean, you could argue about it, but it would be pointless. As I said before, it has happened in the past. Not because the justice broke any law, but because he wasn't impartial.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News