General Ubiquiti discussion

I'm one of the few on here that recognize dream machines and dm pros are are absolutely terrible value and their switches are even worse

The nanos and locos are solid, pretty much set and forget. I have several sets out there and never have to touch them. Been through heat waves, hurricanes, and even an ice storm. They pretty much all have multiple security cameras on the other end, so it's a steady stream of data and never seen so much as a hiccup.

Ubiquiti products are rock solid in my experience. I've been frustrated when settings goes missing because of a GUI change, but I've never had anything brick. I'm always going to trust my experience over some chatter on the Internet.

Most products in the SMB space require licensing. Ubiquiti doesn't. A SonicWall TZ series router with a 3 year security license is about $2500. The UDMP has those threat management features built in for $400. If I were looking to move, I'd check out the Netgate devices running pfSense.

@roobedoo
The UISP side has been solid and i have used 2 locos to bridge to my shed (my telework office) instead of direct burial cable. Ive also installed another bridge for a buddy at his farm and used as proof of concept with solar charged battery pack…all worked great.

For the Nanos, what degree of signal do they send? Is it 45 degree, 90 degree, 180 etc?

quote:

---

I'm one of the few on here that recognize dream machines and dm pros are are absolutely terrible value and their switches are even worse

---

And a pain if you don't buy into their ecosystem. They're the Apple of the networking world.

quote:

---

For the Nanos, what degree of signal do they send? Is it 45 degree, 90 degree, 180 etc?

---

See the nanostation radiation patterns here (5ac pg7 and loco5ac pg9).

In your case of only 200 yards PtP you will hardly have to aim them. Just point two locos in the general direction of each other and they'll link up pretty strong. They'll shoot for miles with some aim. I haven't done any PtMP setups but I think if you plan to maybe get the 5ac for the access point and locos for the multiple stations. Depending on range you could probably set up 90+ degrees easily.

I use them in my office, at home, and I've installed it for my father in law for his camp and his house.


I have not had an overly poor experience with software/firmware issues to date. I have 1 UDMP between the setups. It just has worked since I bought it, fortunately. I'm in no rush to deploy more, but it fit its use case well (wanted cameras at home, wanted to deploy UniFi Talk at home before deciding if I could use it in my office or not (I can't just yet. I still need to buy some phones and test 3cx and could probably deploy this and save myself quite a bit, but I'm waiting until a bit closer until my contract is up to work on this. It's not a horribly difficult thing to do, I realize, but the time it would take me away from patients if there was an error to troubleshoot hasn't been worth it to date. For Unifi to have cheap phones and cheap service to test as an add-on pushed me to the UDMP. Result: certainly not ready for primetime (Talk, that is). I want to be cool and criticize the UDMP, but I haven't had a reason to yet.


I finally went over the edge and installed Protect several months back. The apps are decent. I like the results I get. It's a much easier setup than a Blue Iris and a much better product than the standalone NVR that are everywhere. For a set-and-forget, it costs a lot. I think it's a good product, though, at its base.
Cons: The Protect App viewed from an OSX computer is essentially unusable. iOS it is adequate at worst. Direct interface is pretty good. Making short clips to download on ios and even from the console could use some work- latest update addressed that. Overall, it tends to do what it is supposed to, and they seem to keep improving it. It does feel, sometimes, just barely past Beta, but they seem to be putting most of their time/efforts into this, and I cannot complain about the results.
I demoed it for my FIL. He liked it enough that he, also, was willing to go the "more expensive" route. We went with a Protect NVR for him. Cloud controller, grabbed one of their switches because they're actually one of the cheaper options that offer 802.3bt, and in his case, using 3 of their Flex switches (and their box for it) offered the best cosmetic/functional result (802.3bt in -->4x 802.3at out). We have 3 of these in different areas and have 2-3 cameras and an AP deployed from each of them. There are certainly other solutions. But at the price, the asethetics and function are fairly hard to beat.
He previously had Omada APs. He has a pool and a cabana across the pool- wifi was poor out there with the TP Link (and he had a wireless extender out there). I cannabalized his AP and put a camera in place (wife's request because she hated the look of what is essentially the unifi Mesh AP with ears on it. I swear they are the same device), trenched the wire over to the cabana and moved the AP out there. Wifi coverage is a lot better and now makes it to the end of his yard, too (about another 100y, and he spends a lot of time in "the way back").


It's generally reliable and effective with a con of pricey. Setup is easy. Functionality is enough.
I wish there was a better desktop app for Protect, but there are enough other ways of accessing it that I can give it a pass.
Talk isn't deployable for me.
I'm considering adding an Access control to my garage, more as a tinkering project than a real functional one. I sort of use my home as a test bench for stuff I deploy in my office.

quote:

---

The Protect App viewed from an OSX computer is essentially unusable. iOS it is adequate at worst.

---

quote:

---

I wish there was a better desktop app for Protect

---

What problems are you having with it? I don't use apple stuff, but it has been working well for me on linux and windows machines, as well as the android app.

I had some performance issues last year when live viewing more than 6 or 8 cameras, but the more recent versions have drastically improved performance (mostly by auto adapting resolution). Now I can watch 16+ cameras at once without issue.

quote:

---

It crashes:
1) upon opening about 50% of the time, depending on the update
2) about 75% of the time if viewing the timeline
3) about 80% of the time if toggling sound while scrolling the timeline (default is mute, if you go back to an event, realize you want to turn sound on and do, it crashes quite frequently)

---

Oh wow, no I don't have any of that on android. Occasional crashes sure, but very few and far between. Can't remember the last one. It pretty much just works as expected with little to no frustration.

Looks like a new iOS beta version was released yesterday, maybe give that a try?