- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: United States of F#ck Yeah v. Atleti's kit sponsor | Tues., 9 p.m. CDT (ESPN2)
Posted on 5/28/14 at 6:28 am to Broski
Posted on 5/28/14 at 6:28 am to Broski
quote:
ETA: How ironic is it that uway and Bho are acting as if the "Jurgen is not tactically sound" is merely a meme but they both swear by the whole "Landon is out of shape" theory?
That's not a theory. It was a belief based on his own words and how he played against Mexico and in the one Galaxy match I saw.
quote:
Jurgen has never been tactically strong. I've realized that well before he was coaching the US.
At what point did you "realize" that?
This post was edited on 5/28/14 at 6:29 am
Posted on 5/28/14 at 7:22 am to uway
I really think Jurgen is pushing some of this diamond right now so that we can switch to it during games, as needed.
For instance, if we are down a goal in the last 15 minutes, he may want a more offensive formation. Or if he feels a game is opening up some and wants a more dedicated CDM and CAM rather than relying upon their communication. I could be wrong, as we all know Jurgen doesn't use tactics. Just yoga and belief.
The players on the field would essentially be the same for a 4-2-3-1 as compared to the diamond that he was going to start last night. So the ability to switch at desired times may be nice.
For instance, if we are down a goal in the last 15 minutes, he may want a more offensive formation. Or if he feels a game is opening up some and wants a more dedicated CDM and CAM rather than relying upon their communication. I could be wrong, as we all know Jurgen doesn't use tactics. Just yoga and belief.
The players on the field would essentially be the same for a 4-2-3-1 as compared to the diamond that he was going to start last night. So the ability to switch at desired times may be nice.
Posted on 5/28/14 at 7:46 am to uway
quote:
It was a belief based on his own words and how he played against Mexico and in the one Galaxy match I saw.
you being serious?
"i'm forming my opinion partly from what landon said but also from a very small sample size a considerable time ago"
i thought you were getting sick of arguing this. you're an idiot. it's been established. move on.
Posted on 5/28/14 at 8:12 am to PTBob
quote:
"i'm forming my opinion partly from what landon said but also from a very small sample size a considerable time ago"
struggling to get in shape
badly out of shape
Posted on 5/28/14 at 9:12 am to uway
first link isn't working second link is a joke. it sites the mexico (almost 2 months ago man, 2 months) game which you already sited. he didn't appear out of shape against the union a couple nights ago, which was one god damn day after the camp. i'm not talking about his assist and goals that night i'm talking about pure physical shape and running.
just stop. please stop with the out of shape shite. it's just not true.
just stop. please stop with the out of shape shite. it's just not true.
This post was edited on 5/28/14 at 9:13 am
Posted on 5/28/14 at 9:20 am to PTBob
quote:
please stop with the out of shape shite.
I'm not saying he's out of shape. I thought he was prior to the news that he aced the beep test, just like most everyone else thought it when he showed up fat to the Mexico friendly.
Posted on 5/28/14 at 9:25 am to uway
so why continue to site articles when you KNOW the facts are otherwise?
actually, this shite doesn't belong in this thread. frick it.
I was not impressed with our team's play last night and was really hoping to see Julian Green so I could form a better opinion on him. I'm thinking Jurgen gave JJ the entire game and hopefully will give Beckerdreads the next game. This WAS our first tune up game though so I'm not putting a ton into it. Would've liked to see a little bit better of game though. Effort was there.
actually, this shite doesn't belong in this thread. frick it.
I was not impressed with our team's play last night and was really hoping to see Julian Green so I could form a better opinion on him. I'm thinking Jurgen gave JJ the entire game and hopefully will give Beckerdreads the next game. This WAS our first tune up game though so I'm not putting a ton into it. Would've liked to see a little bit better of game though. Effort was there.
Posted on 5/28/14 at 9:42 am to PTBob
In the 4-4-2 diamond, is it any one player's job in particular to pick up the ball from the defenders and bring it upfield to the attack?
When we play the 4-2-3-1, it seems like that's mostly Bradley's job, and he is always available to do it.
He seemed less available last night, but maybe I just saw that wrong.
When we play the 4-2-3-1, it seems like that's mostly Bradley's job, and he is always available to do it.
He seemed less available last night, but maybe I just saw that wrong.
Posted on 5/28/14 at 10:22 am to uway
quote:
In the 4-4-2 diamond, is it any one player's job in particular to pick up the ball from the defenders and bring it upfield to the attack?
It should be, but the DM can't move too far upfield or else will be out of position, and if the opposition does even the most cursory marking, you will have some sort of unbalance moving the ball upfield.
I'd rather we play a 4-4-2 where Bradley starts a lot deeper than a diamond where Bradley can easily be marked out of the game.
Posted on 5/28/14 at 10:34 am to crazy4lsu
quote:
I'd rather we play a 4-4-2 where Bradley starts a lot deeper than a diamond where Bradley can easily be marked out of the game.
If Bradley passes like he normally does, him being the attacking mid means he sets up a lot of shot opportunities. The problem last night was that Bradley was really struggling with his touch on passing.
We did have some issues passing from the back line but I didn't see that as the fault of the mids. For the most part, USA just weren't getting the pace on their passes correct.
Posted on 5/28/14 at 10:49 am to SouthOfSouth
Just watched the game. All the hate that Wondolowski received in this thread is just pure silliness. I'm quite sure those posters were ones that have always hated him. Second header was quite good and was stopped with a good save.
Posted on 5/28/14 at 10:58 am to SouthOfSouth
quote:
The problem last night was that Bradley was really struggling with his touch on passing.
That wasn't the only problem. As crazy noted, he was also having trouble finding space when AZ was settled behind the ball having to drop even with Jermaine Jones fairly frequently to find it.
If training was as hard as it was supposed to be, I'll attribute their lack of sharpness to that. A lot of players looked really tired at some point tonight. I thought that Jermaine Jones was going to fall over at any given moment from 80'+.
Posted on 5/28/14 at 11:05 am to joey barton
I fully expect Bradley to not have to pass into a wall at the World Cup, but they will be bringing a lot more pressure on the team. Azerbaijan is just so different that it is hard to tell a ton for this game. This was like a home WCQ match.
Posted on 5/28/14 at 11:14 am to Vicks Kennel Club
Yeah, I was surprised to see people elsewhere freaking out about this...though I probably shouldn't be
Posted on 5/28/14 at 11:42 am to joey barton
I put a lot of faith in star players and veterans that they will right the ship. I think too many people are too obsessed with young players over proven vets. Bradley's performance was bad, but it raises no flags.
This post was edited on 5/28/14 at 11:43 am
Posted on 5/28/14 at 12:16 pm to Vicks Kennel Club
Bradley played bad, but as others have said I still have faith in him to play well against teams that don't put all 11 men behind the ball.
Jones surprised me. He was solid in that holding role.
Gonzalez was better than I was expecting.
Mix and Johannsson hugging was a thing of beauty.
Jones surprised me. He was solid in that holding role.
Gonzalez was better than I was expecting.
Mix and Johannsson hugging was a thing of beauty.
Posted on 5/28/14 at 1:38 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
In the 4-4-2 diamond, is it any one player's job in particular to pick up the ball from the defenders and bring it upfield to the attack?
In the 4-4-2 essentially Bradley would be playing as a False CAM which I love but it requires communication with the other CDM to know when he is going to push the ball upfield. So offensively it would be more like the diamond but the problem we have is that our wingers are more like midfielders and they pinch in which doesn't give Bradley the space he needs to distribute
Posted on 5/28/14 at 1:39 pm to cwil177
quote:
Gonzalez was better than I was expecting.
He was quietly very solid.
Posted on 5/28/14 at 1:43 pm to Broski
Just curious, will the #s worn last night be the same for the rest of the games this summer? Seems like that was the case in previous cycles, but would be good to know before I buy a new jersey.
Posted on 5/28/14 at 1:45 pm to DEANintheYAY
Mix acted like the 10 shirt was still Donovan's in an interview after the game. 
Popular
Back to top


2








