- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Ryan and Mac charging Wrexham 9% a year on the money they put into the club
Posted on 2/12/24 at 5:56 pm to Draconian Sanctions
Posted on 2/12/24 at 5:56 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
Whataboutism If you can’t respond without deflecting to something else you’re essentially admitting defeat already.
Typical response.
I’m going to throne stones, but no one look at me. I’m perfect.
0
Posted on 2/12/24 at 6:08 pm to Broski
quote:
So what exactly are you angry about?
Who said I was angry?
Posted on 2/12/24 at 6:19 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
Who said I was angry?
Your actions in this thread.
But if you want to play the denial game, cool.
Posted on 2/12/24 at 6:50 pm to Broski
quote:
Your actions in this thread.
lol like I threw a brick through someone’s window
Some of yalls feeling ever hurt way too easily
Posted on 2/12/24 at 6:51 pm to Draconian Sanctions
Now you're just deflecting... ironic, no?
Posted on 2/12/24 at 6:55 pm to BCLA
They’re a league 2 team
Posted on 2/12/24 at 9:53 pm to Broski
Hilariously wrong
Again
Again
Posted on 2/12/24 at 10:11 pm to Draconian Sanctions
Back to the topic, what is your problem with what's happening here?
Posted on 2/12/24 at 10:44 pm to Broski
You want me to restate my OP?
Are you intentionally trying to muddy the waters or what?
Just going to assume you’re an Arsenal or Chelsea fan.
Are you intentionally trying to muddy the waters or what?
Just going to assume you’re an Arsenal or Chelsea fan.
This post was edited on 2/12/24 at 10:46 pm
Posted on 2/12/24 at 10:49 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
Bad look
quote:
You’re projecting again
The irony
Posted on 2/12/24 at 10:51 pm to cwil177
Speaking of Arsenal/Chelsea fans
Posted on 2/12/24 at 11:08 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
You want me to restate my OP?
No, that wouldn't do any good since what you said doesn't make a lot of sense. I was hoping you'd be able to better explain your issue with it, but you're proving to be kinda slow.
quote:
Are you intentionally trying to muddy the waters or what?
Just going to assume you’re an Arsenal or Chelsea fan.
MOAR DEFLECTIONS!!!
This post was edited on 2/12/24 at 11:09 pm
Posted on 2/13/24 at 11:24 am to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
You want me to restate my OP?
No? We've asked follow up questions so that you could clarify why you think there is an issue with Wrexham's situation, but you've just ignored those. You are either ignorant of all the details of their situation, or are willfully ignoring those details so that you can have some "hot take."
So what are we all missing here? You say that Ryan and Mac are "scummy" for charging a higher interest rate than most, yet blatantly ignore that they are doing significantly more for the club than simply just loaning them money...
Posted on 2/13/24 at 11:35 am to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
Just going to assume you’re an Arsenal or Chelsea fan.
WTF? we dont have anything to do with this stupid thread
Wrexham owners didnt have to sell to the Americans
I am sure the loan is a tax strategy thing for them
ticket sales go up, club merch sales explode, club value goes up and instead of taking profits from club balance sheet components my guess is they are keeping the increased profits in the club balance sheet and just taking a higher interest rate on their loan to the club.
Posted on 3/2/24 at 5:25 pm to SUB
quote:
but you've just ignored those
Which ones? I’ll be happy to answer them
Even MIKE ASHLEY didn’t charge interest, much less at 150% of the base rate
Posted on 3/6/24 at 7:33 pm to Draconian Sanctions
I’m not really seeing an issue here. The scumminess of the rate, should be based on its value they get in return. Like a lower rate in one situation could be scummier than a higher rate in another.
It’s like that one quant hedge fund that has had outrageously positive rates of returns for decades, so they charge extremely high fees. But even after fees, clients get a better rate of return the vast majority of other hedge funds, before fees. So their fees aren’t scummy.
It’s like that one quant hedge fund that has had outrageously positive rates of returns for decades, so they charge extremely high fees. But even after fees, clients get a better rate of return the vast majority of other hedge funds, before fees. So their fees aren’t scummy.
Posted on 3/13/24 at 5:14 am to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
don’t act
They’re actors
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News