- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Penalty Kicks Love 'em or Hate 'em?
Posted on 6/27/12 at 4:31 pm to Gmorgan4982
Posted on 6/27/12 at 4:31 pm to Gmorgan4982
quote:
IMO, it makes it seem a little less like the game was decided solely on penalties. At least the team who lost the PKs would have 30 minutes to do about it. I don't know if most people will agree, but I think it's better.
This is possibly one of the worst ideas I've ever read.
1
Posted on 6/27/12 at 4:33 pm to BraveTiger225
quote:
I stand by my guns. The replay is the only way to truly decide. But good luck getting teams to agree to that.
You'd frick tournaments timings up. That's not a practical idea.
Posted on 6/27/12 at 4:36 pm to BraveTiger225
quote:
I stand by my guns. The replay is the only way to truly decide. But good luck getting teams to agree to that.
This works in league tournaments. But replays just aren't feasible in international tournaments of this size.
Posted on 6/27/12 at 4:36 pm to LSUSOBEAST1
Love the silver goal concept. Love love love.
Posted on 6/27/12 at 4:37 pm to castorinho
Back in the old, old days they did it. Even in international competition. I know it's not practical with fixture congestion the problem it already is.
My point is just that is the only fair way. Other than that, play until someone scores.
My point is just that is the only fair way. Other than that, play until someone scores.
Posted on 6/27/12 at 4:41 pm to BraveTiger225
As impure as it is, the old 90s MLS/NASL run up 8 second penalty shootout is an interesting concept. The keeper doesn't have to come off his line, and the attacking player actually has to be creative in the run up and shoot.
Posted on 6/27/12 at 4:44 pm to thenry712
quote:
As impure as it is, the old 90s MLS/NASL run up 8 second penalty shootout is an interesting concept. The keeper doesn't have to come off his line, and the attacking player actually has to be creative in the run up and shoot.
I had only read about this format until the other day. Showed some replay of one on FSC. It's bizarre, but it might be a better way.
Posted on 6/27/12 at 5:35 pm to Atom-Z
quote:
Personally I love them I think they are exciting and fun to watch. What say you?
I love it. Players are mentally and physically beat. Real nut-busting pressure. Can lead to epic heroes and/or goats. Topic always great for discussion too.
Posted on 6/27/12 at 6:10 pm to BraveTiger225
quote:
I stand by my guns. The replay is the only way to truly decide. But good luck getting teams to agree to that.
It's pretty much impossible in tournament settings. At least outside the final. Even then, it could cause a bunch of issues.
Posted on 6/27/12 at 6:11 pm to Atom-Z
I understand they aren't the perfect way to determine a game, but they're certainly exciting.
As far as ridiculous tiebreakers go, I'll take penalties over away goals.
As far as ridiculous tiebreakers go, I'll take penalties over away goals.
This post was edited on 6/27/12 at 6:12 pm
Posted on 6/27/12 at 6:55 pm to Atom-Z
I say golden goal 30 minutes max OT period but both teams have to remove one player every 5 minutes. Still tied then to PK's.
Posted on 6/27/12 at 6:56 pm to ohiovol
quote:
As far as ridiculous tiebreakers go, I'll take penalties over away goals.
This. I don't know what genius ever came up with the away goals concept but he needs to be cockslapped.
Posted on 6/27/12 at 9:48 pm to Methuselah
yeah. I think taking players off the field would result in more goals. Maybe just start 9 on 9 in extra time?
Posted on 6/27/12 at 9:49 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:No. It's not that bad. You're being dramatic.
This is possibly one of the worst ideas I've ever read.
Posted on 6/28/12 at 6:58 am to WarSlamEagle
quote:
Love the silver goal concept. Love love love.
Let me play devil's advocate here. What if the wind was blowing 30 mph in the face of a team during first OT? They don't get a chance to use the advantage if the other team capitalizes on it? That doesn't sound fair.
Posted on 6/28/12 at 7:39 am to chuckyshah19
quote:
yeah. I think taking players off the field would result in more goals. Maybe just start 9 on 9 in extra time?
Yeah but then you have already tired players covering even more of the field than they normally would. You would have to have way more subs in ET.
Posted on 6/28/12 at 8:29 am to etm512
Pks suck. Sure, they are exciting for about two minutes. But otherwise have zero to do with who wins the game. It's like a free throw contest to decide who wins a basketball game.
Look at yesterday in extra time, spain dominated and Portugal was content to let it go to pks.
If there was no pk, Portugal would have had to play more aggresively. There is no "shot to win" by playing it safe.
You should decide the outcome of the game in the same manner as the rest of the game. If they play four four hours, so be it. Fitness is part of the game.
I would probably add another sub for every 30 minutes of extra time.
Look at yesterday in extra time, spain dominated and Portugal was content to let it go to pks.
If there was no pk, Portugal would have had to play more aggresively. There is no "shot to win" by playing it safe.
You should decide the outcome of the game in the same manner as the rest of the game. If they play four four hours, so be it. Fitness is part of the game.
I would probably add another sub for every 30 minutes of extra time.
Posted on 6/28/12 at 11:08 am to Methuselah
quote:
I say golden goal 30 minutes max OT period but both teams have to remove one player every 5 minutes. Still tied then to PK's.
I think the problem with golden goal is that teams were so afraid of giving up a goal that they were more defensive.
Is there any stat on whether golden goal led to more or less shootouts?
Posted on 6/28/12 at 11:19 am to Tigerstark
quote:
You should decide the outcome of the game in the same manner as the rest of the game. If they play four four hours, so be it. Fitness is part of the game.
Not plausible at all
Posted on 6/28/12 at 11:25 am to Atom-Z
I would like to see them figure out a way for teams alternate corners or free kicks from a designated spot with an additional 10-15 seconds of play in case there is a rebound opportunity.
If you go first and score, other team has to match. If you go first and miss and they make, you lose.
If you both make, go again.
If you go first and score, other team has to match. If you go first and miss and they make, you lose.
If you both make, go again.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News