- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Netherlands v Ecuador game thread
Posted on 11/25/22 at 9:39 am
Posted on 11/25/22 at 9:39 am
I'm fully kitted out for this tasty appetizer and while I'm rooting for me Dutch ancestry to come through I'd be most happy with a draw for gambling purposes 
2
Posted on 11/25/22 at 9:57 am to SirWinston
Mate, I like you more than most here but I fear you may actually be mentally challenged. Or a narcissist. One or the other. Maybe both
Cheers
Cheers
This post was edited on 11/25/22 at 9:58 am
Posted on 11/25/22 at 10:06 am to Bottom9
Buried
Posted on 11/25/22 at 10:10 am to SirWinston
Damn dude I’m pretty creeped out by your dark black light room even more knowing how strange you are on this website
Posted on 11/25/22 at 10:29 am to olddawg26
Dutch are playing with fire here.
Posted on 11/25/22 at 10:33 am to Alyosha
After Timbers challenge, the ref missed an opportunity to keep the game in his control by not carding Timber on the shove. Don’t know why it’s so hard to see patterns
Posted on 11/25/22 at 10:33 am to Alyosha
Yea. Last ten minutes the Dutch are getting worked on that left hand side
Posted on 11/25/22 at 10:46 am to glassman
Man we need a ref like this. Suits the toughness and grit of usa great.
Posted on 11/25/22 at 10:48 am to olddawg26
Looks like an outdoor area.
Posted on 11/25/22 at 10:48 am to bbap
GGGGOOOOOAAAALLLLL
Nope, offside
Nope, offside
This post was edited on 11/25/22 at 10:49 am
Posted on 11/25/22 at 10:49 am to glassman
This is a delightful game.
Posted on 11/25/22 at 10:49 am to oliveandblue
That’s tough for Ecuador. I don’t think the goalie was getting to that regardless.
Posted on 11/25/22 at 10:50 am to kengel2
He didn’t touch it or make a play on it and had no involvement on whether it was a goal or not. Is that the correct interpretation of the rule?
Posted on 11/25/22 at 10:51 am to cwil177
I don’t think so either. He wasn’t blocked from the initial shot and went to the ground, the deflection would have beat him regardless.
Posted on 11/25/22 at 10:52 am to HottyToddy7
I am lightly rooting for Ecuador and think it’s correct. He was in front of the keeper and shielded him.
If he wasn’t there, I bet it’s still a goal because of the fluky nature of the play, but that is the correct call.
If he wasn’t there, I bet it’s still a goal because of the fluky nature of the play, but that is the correct call.
Posted on 11/25/22 at 10:56 am to Keys Open Doors
He was shielding his view of the play. I don’t think he was “influenced” by the Ecuadorian’s positioning though.
Posted on 11/25/22 at 10:56 am to Keys Open Doors
quote:
that is the correct call.
It is, but the rule is stupid because it is subjective. Should only be disallowed if it was touched offside, or if the guy actively interfered with the keeper.
Posted on 11/25/22 at 11:12 am to Alyosha
How will Ecuador qualify for world cups or even score at world cups when Enner Valencia retires?
Ecuadors last 6 goals or so at the WC have been from him
Ecuadors last 6 goals or so at the WC have been from him
Page 1 of 2
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News