re: ZeroHedge: Stunning Flood of J6 Fedsurrection Evidence Can't Be Ignored

quote:

---

She died from a drug overdose

---

And George Floyd died... or was "murdered"... from a knee on his neck, right?

quote:

---

We could be here all day...

---

We really could, going on and on with examples... It's pretty fricking incredible. Countries fight civil wars over much much less.

I think you are giving the government far too much credit. The idea that the federal government, while being run by president trump, could get all of the courts across the country to throw out dozens of voter fraud /election fraud cases brought by trump, get the FBI (or whoever we are now claiming caused J6) to create a fake riot, and everything else involved, not to mention figure out a way to steal tens of thousands of votes across multiple states, some even controlled by Republicans, across the entire country without getting caught is right up there with flat earth theory odds.

For starters, If trump hadn't asked his supporters to come to the capital at the exact time as the vote, how would the "deep state" have planned this?

But even more simply than that, why would the "deep state" need a riot? The votes were being certified. How does a riot help them in any way? All it did was stop the proceeding for a few hours.

You’re wasting your time trying to introduce logic and reason into an exchange with Vox. He can’t be helped.

Being declared unreasonable by a pee-pee dossier true believer is about a shiny of a badge of honor as I can imagine.

quote:

---

The joint session resumed at 8pm and the Senate voted to reject the AZ challenges at 10pm.

To believe that the challenges weren't wholly derailed by the violence is immeasurably naive.

---

The challenge was voted down 93-6. Are you suggesting that the "deep state" planned the riot because they knew it would somehow pass but with the riot it would get voted down by a huge margin?

You are acting like this was some close thing that almost happened had it not been for the riot. None of this was realistic and the vote totals show that pretty clearly, do they not?

I'm saying to believe anything other than that the vote was colored mightily by the events at the Capitol outside of the House/Senate chambers is incredibly short-sighted.

The problem is that we'll never know how the votes would've gone, had the debates been able to run their course with the appropriate evidence introduced.

After all, the judges were working overtime to ensure that their courtrooms weren't the venue for the election "results" to be overturned.

quote:

---

Do the 20 million missing votes in the next election show anything
pretty clearly?

---

I would strongly encourage you to look this up if you don't trust my source. There wasn't 20M missing votes. This is something that right wing media picked up on and lied about. They do this pretty regularly. The vote totals went down slightly in 2024, but not anything close to 20 Million.

https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/statistics/elections/2020
https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/statistics/elections/2024

In 2020 there were around 158M votes and 2024 had around 158M votes. Roughly 3M vote difference after everything was counted. Which only comes out to to 1-2% difference in the vote total.

When I find myself to be under such a large misunderstanding and I find that everyone I talk to and every source I've been using agrees with such a large misunderstanding that maybe I'm stuck in a bubble. It happens to everyone.

The idiots scaling the walls in that photo op were clearly internal influences, especially when you consider that Capital Police were opening gates, opening doors, and in some cases, unlocking doors to let people in.

This is hilarious to see. LOL. Scaling the walls. LOLOLOLOL