- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
WTF Kentucky you sick freaks
Posted on 1/17/24 at 11:23 pm
Posted on 1/17/24 at 11:23 pm
19
Posted on 1/17/24 at 11:27 pm to Emmanuel Goldstein
its a slippery slope, but 1st cousins arent blood related any more than 167th cousins
i could see a point in taking 1st cousins off the incest list, but its still on the "thats creepy as shite, dont do it", list
i could see a point in taking 1st cousins off the incest list, but its still on the "thats creepy as shite, dont do it", list
Posted on 1/17/24 at 11:29 pm to Emmanuel Goldstein
Whomever wrote that article had parents who were siblings.
Newsweek is a shell of its former glory.
Newsweek is a shell of its former glory.
Posted on 1/17/24 at 11:33 pm to keakar
How hot is the cousin
Posted on 1/17/24 at 11:52 pm to Emmanuel Goldstein
Posted on 1/17/24 at 11:56 pm to keakar
Wait how are first cousins not more blood-related than 100th cousins? Am I missing something? First cousins share 12.5% the same DNA. That’s definitely more than further down the line?
This post was edited on 1/17/24 at 11:58 pm
Posted on 1/17/24 at 11:57 pm to Emmanuel Goldstein
Thought we could expect this to be about Alabama but not Kentucky!
Posted on 1/18/24 at 12:03 am to BeefSupreme
No, really! It’s ok.
Trust the science.
Trust the science.
Posted on 1/18/24 at 12:14 am to Emmanuel Goldstein
They are trying to clear a path for Palestinian refugees.
Posted on 1/18/24 at 12:53 am to shoelessjoe
quote:
Thought we could expect this to be about Alabama but not Kentucky!
Thats because its already legal in Alabama.
(not kidding)
Posted on 1/18/24 at 12:56 am to shoelessjoe
quote:
Thought we could expect this to be about Alabama but not Kentucky!
Tell your boyfriend his jokes aren't funny.
This post was edited on 1/18/24 at 12:57 am
Posted on 1/18/24 at 12:57 am to SECSolomonGrundy
quote:
Thats because its already legal in Alabama.
It’s actually legal in 41 states according to Wiki.
Posted on 1/18/24 at 1:00 am to Robin Masters
Yeah and even in most states where it is illegal to marry, like Louisiana and Mississippi, it is still legal to cohabitate and procreate.
Posted on 1/18/24 at 1:03 am to SECSolomonGrundy
quote:
Yeah and even in most states where it is illegal to marry, like Louisiana and Mississippi, it is still legal to cohabitate and procreate.
Of course it begs the question of why it was necessary to make it illegal in the other 9.
Posted on 1/18/24 at 1:33 am to Emmanuel Goldstein
Source for below information:
Alot of liberal states up in the legal list.....
States that allow first-cousin marriages
Alabama, California, Colorado, Connecticut, the District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, New Mexico, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, and Vermont.
Conditional First Cousin Marriages
Arizona: Only if both parties are 65 or older or one is infertile.
Indiana: Only if both parties are 65 or older or one is infertile.
Maine: Proof of genetic counseling from a genetic counselor.
Minnesota: Only certain types.
Utah: Only if both parties are 65 or older, or both are 55 or older, with a district court finding of infertility of either party.
Wisconsin: Only if the woman is at least 55 or either is permanently sterile.
States where first-cousin marriages are not allowed
Alaska, Arkansas, Delaware, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Mississippi, Missouri, Louisiana, Michigan, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, North Hampshire, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Texas, Washington, West Virginia, and Wyoming.
Alot of liberal states up in the legal list.....
States that allow first-cousin marriages
Alabama, California, Colorado, Connecticut, the District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, New Mexico, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, and Vermont.
Conditional First Cousin Marriages
Arizona: Only if both parties are 65 or older or one is infertile.
Indiana: Only if both parties are 65 or older or one is infertile.
Maine: Proof of genetic counseling from a genetic counselor.
Minnesota: Only certain types.
Utah: Only if both parties are 65 or older, or both are 55 or older, with a district court finding of infertility of either party.
Wisconsin: Only if the woman is at least 55 or either is permanently sterile.
States where first-cousin marriages are not allowed
Alaska, Arkansas, Delaware, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Mississippi, Missouri, Louisiana, Michigan, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, North Hampshire, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Texas, Washington, West Virginia, and Wyoming.
Posted on 1/18/24 at 3:32 am to Emmanuel Goldstein
Not a fan,
but as long as you allow same sex marriage, this is comparatively trivial.
but as long as you allow same sex marriage, this is comparatively trivial.
Posted on 1/18/24 at 3:52 am to TrueTiger
Agree. Equally gross.
Posted on 1/18/24 at 5:02 am to keakar
quote:
its a slippery slope, but 1st cousins arent blood related any more than 167th cousins
WTF WTF
Posted on 1/18/24 at 5:13 am to Emmanuel Goldstein
The author of that bill has come out and said removing first cousins was a mistake. LINK /
Posted on 1/18/24 at 5:22 am to Emmanuel Goldstein
Still not as demented as gay sex.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News