Started By
Message

re: WSJ waits for ruling and runs another story with sources.. Trump involved

Posted on 7/23/25 at 5:27 pm to
Posted by BugaNation86
Member since Jul 2025
411 posts
Posted on 7/23/25 at 5:27 pm to
Trump backed off of Epstein when the allegations came out in 2006. No one believes trump has anything to do with this outside of the liberals who have been broke by TDS.
Posted by LSUTANGERINE
Baton Rouge and Northshore LA
Member since Sep 2006
38468 posts
Posted on 7/23/25 at 5:28 pm to
And now we know why the files have not been released. And now we know why the big Obama distraction.
Posted by andwesway
Zachary, LA
Member since Jun 2016
3379 posts
Posted on 7/23/25 at 5:32 pm to
C'mon now. Would y'all really be surprised if he was on the client list? I wouldn't and I voted for him three times.
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
36750 posts
Posted on 7/23/25 at 5:34 pm to
Have you made an attempt at explaining why the Democrats would not have released or leaked any damaging information on Trump contained within “the Epstein files” during the 2024 Presidential election? If not, now seems like a good time.
Posted by seedmonster77
Member since Feb 2025
261 posts
Posted on 7/23/25 at 5:34 pm to
Who cares who is in the files/videos.. just release everything and let the people decide. Stop trying to protect billionaire buddies.
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
36750 posts
Posted on 7/23/25 at 5:41 pm to
Well, if he gives in to yall’s demands on this one, there are about 7 other ones I’d like every bit of information released on. That’s only fair. And I’m sure there will be other folks with demands of their own. It needs to be fair across the board.
Posted by MisslePig
Member since Jul 2018
1174 posts
Posted on 7/23/25 at 5:46 pm to
quote:

average comments


Imagine not reading the article and posting this…hilariously ironic below average IQ poster
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
167343 posts
Posted on 7/23/25 at 5:48 pm to
And now we know why this hit piece out of context has aggregated so much it goes on for pages.

As soon as Tulsi was out this hit.

WaPo is next.

Who in their right mind believes them?



Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128778 posts
Posted on 7/23/25 at 5:49 pm to
I have it on good authority that you touch kids.
Posted by Gifman
Clearwater Beach, FL
Member since Jan 2021
18881 posts
Posted on 7/23/25 at 5:50 pm to
quote:

And now we know why the files have not been released. And now we know why the big Obama distraction.


You do know the entire world has known that Trump is in these files for like a decade right? Trump used Epsteins plane multiple times but just never to pedo island.
Posted by Arkaea79
Member since Sep 2022
1091 posts
Posted on 7/23/25 at 5:51 pm to
quote:

C'mon now. Would y'all really be surprised if he was on the client list? I wouldn't and I voted for him three times


My real question is why do so many people think a client list of associates is a guest book of pedos?

It's so fricking stupid. Stop it. There is no magical "list" of pedos.
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
26487 posts
Posted on 7/23/25 at 5:53 pm to
quote:

I bet the media will be all over this story


Yeah, like a rug hiding a pile of dirt.
Posted by FlySaint
FL Panhandle
Member since May 2018
2557 posts
Posted on 7/23/25 at 5:56 pm to
And for some inexplicable reason the Dems just didn’t see the need to release this extremely damaging information at any point during the last three elections. Strange isn’t it?
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
77256 posts
Posted on 7/23/25 at 5:57 pm to
quote:

Who cares who is in the files/videos.. just release everything and let the people decide. Stop trying to protect billionaire buddies.
This.

Once again, ALL of this is the way it is because of how Trump has flubbed this whole situation.

It is easily fixable.

Release the files with the victims and illegal images removed.

It really isn’t complicated, no matter how everyone tries to make it seem.
Posted by aTmTexas Dillo
East Texas Lake
Member since Sep 2018
24001 posts
Posted on 7/23/25 at 6:00 pm to
quote:

i guess we will have to see how the judges rule in the other cases that they requested

quote:

that they requested

They being Trump's DOJ.
Posted by aTmTexas Dillo
East Texas Lake
Member since Sep 2018
24001 posts
Posted on 7/23/25 at 6:02 pm to
quote:

Mid-terms are going to be a blood bath. So much material against the magats.


I just watched a CNN report on this on YouTube. Republican's will likely hold the majority of their districts with no problem. There may be four or five that are suspect. Mid Term Redistricting in Texas and Ohio are likely to bring in eight new red districts. Of course dems will lose the eight.
Posted by aTmTexas Dillo
East Texas Lake
Member since Sep 2018
24001 posts
Posted on 7/23/25 at 6:03 pm to
quote:

just release everything and let the people decide

The court said no.
Posted by Goforit
Member since Apr 2019
8757 posts
Posted on 7/23/25 at 6:05 pm to
WSJ will pay out millions to Trump!
Posted by aTmTexas Dillo
East Texas Lake
Member since Sep 2018
24001 posts
Posted on 7/23/25 at 6:05 pm to
quote:

Release the files with the victims and illegal images removed.

The court says no. As much as you want it, the court says no.
Posted by Goforit
Member since Apr 2019
8757 posts
Posted on 7/23/25 at 6:10 pm to
If there was something damaging about Trump in the Epstein Grand jury testimony there is no way in hell that a democratic judge would block its release. CNN and all the other left wing outlets would be broadcasting it before it was officially released.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram