- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: WSJ waits for ruling and runs another story with sources.. Trump involved
Posted on 7/23/25 at 5:27 pm to antman123
Posted on 7/23/25 at 5:27 pm to antman123
Trump backed off of Epstein when the allegations came out in 2006. No one believes trump has anything to do with this outside of the liberals who have been broke by TDS.
Posted on 7/23/25 at 5:28 pm to Jjdoc
And now we know why the files have not been released. And now we know why the big Obama distraction.
Posted on 7/23/25 at 5:32 pm to Jjdoc
C'mon now. Would y'all really be surprised if he was on the client list? I wouldn't and I voted for him three times.
Posted on 7/23/25 at 5:34 pm to LSUTANGERINE
Have you made an attempt at explaining why the Democrats would not have released or leaked any damaging information on Trump contained within “the Epstein files” during the 2024 Presidential election? If not, now seems like a good time.
Posted on 7/23/25 at 5:34 pm to Jjdoc
Who cares who is in the files/videos.. just release everything and let the people decide. Stop trying to protect billionaire buddies.
Posted on 7/23/25 at 5:41 pm to seedmonster77
Well, if he gives in to yall’s demands on this one, there are about 7 other ones I’d like every bit of information released on. That’s only fair. And I’m sure there will be other folks with demands of their own. It needs to be fair across the board.
Posted on 7/23/25 at 5:46 pm to Average_Comments
quote:
average comments
Imagine not reading the article and posting this…hilariously ironic below average IQ poster
Posted on 7/23/25 at 5:48 pm to LSUTANGERINE
And now we know why this hit piece out of context has aggregated so much it goes on for pages.
As soon as Tulsi was out this hit.
WaPo is next.
Who in their right mind believes them?
As soon as Tulsi was out this hit.
WaPo is next.
Who in their right mind believes them?
Posted on 7/23/25 at 5:49 pm to SneezyBeltranIsHere
I have it on good authority that you touch kids.
Posted on 7/23/25 at 5:50 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
And now we know why the files have not been released. And now we know why the big Obama distraction.
You do know the entire world has known that Trump is in these files for like a decade right? Trump used Epsteins plane multiple times but just never to pedo island.
Posted on 7/23/25 at 5:51 pm to andwesway
quote:
C'mon now. Would y'all really be surprised if he was on the client list? I wouldn't and I voted for him three times
My real question is why do so many people think a client list of associates is a guest book of pedos?
It's so fricking stupid. Stop it. There is no magical "list" of pedos.
Posted on 7/23/25 at 5:53 pm to BurlesonCountyAg
quote:
I bet the media will be all over this story
Yeah, like a rug hiding a pile of dirt.
Posted on 7/23/25 at 5:56 pm to Jjdoc
And for some inexplicable reason the Dems just didn’t see the need to release this extremely damaging information at any point during the last three elections. Strange isn’t it?
Posted on 7/23/25 at 5:57 pm to seedmonster77
quote:This.
Who cares who is in the files/videos.. just release everything and let the people decide. Stop trying to protect billionaire buddies.
Once again, ALL of this is the way it is because of how Trump has flubbed this whole situation.
It is easily fixable.
Release the files with the victims and illegal images removed.
It really isn’t complicated, no matter how everyone tries to make it seem.
Posted on 7/23/25 at 6:00 pm to antman123
quote:
i guess we will have to see how the judges rule in the other cases that they requested
quote:
that they requested
They being Trump's DOJ.
Posted on 7/23/25 at 6:02 pm to Kentucker
quote:
Mid-terms are going to be a blood bath. So much material against the magats.
I just watched a CNN report on this on YouTube. Republican's will likely hold the majority of their districts with no problem. There may be four or five that are suspect. Mid Term Redistricting in Texas and Ohio are likely to bring in eight new red districts. Of course dems will lose the eight.
Posted on 7/23/25 at 6:03 pm to seedmonster77
quote:
just release everything and let the people decide
The court said no.
Posted on 7/23/25 at 6:05 pm to aTmTexas Dillo
WSJ will pay out millions to Trump!

Posted on 7/23/25 at 6:05 pm to Scruffy
quote:
Release the files with the victims and illegal images removed.
The court says no. As much as you want it, the court says no.
Posted on 7/23/25 at 6:10 pm to aTmTexas Dillo
If there was something damaging about Trump in the Epstein Grand jury testimony there is no way in hell that a democratic judge would block its release. CNN and all the other left wing outlets would be broadcasting it before it was officially released.
Popular
Back to top


0








