Started By
Message

re: WSJ: Trump Not Rebuilding Military

Posted on 7/13/25 at 3:14 pm to
Posted by jizzle6609
Houston
Member since Jul 2009
20087 posts
Posted on 7/13/25 at 3:14 pm to
quote:

They aren’t complaining about something inconsequential. We’re falling behind and fast. The Burke, even the Flight III’s, are maxed out versions of 1970’s and 80’s designs. We can’t get a new class of ships to production in any meaningful sense for more than a generation.


Have you watched YouTube the last year?

Russia Ukraine Iran etc are absolute jokes of militaries. You are a moron if you think we are lagging them.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
55452 posts
Posted on 7/13/25 at 4:29 pm to
quote:

The U.S. has 11 aircraft carriers the next country would be China with 3. It takes China and 4 other countries to equal the U.S. The U.S. has 80 destroyers. Next on the list is China with 50. Then there is a huge drop off. Submarines is where China and Russia compete in numbers but the U.S. again has better subs. The air forces are not close. The U.S. is far more advanced with much larger numbers.

How many wooden battleships do we have? You listed a whole lot of useless shite. Technology has moved on stranding us with a big, expensive, almost useless military. Of course, we are still spending money building more of the useless stuff.

We should scrap most of our carriers and build a thousand cheap ships with drone fleets on them. Cheap robots are the future of the military. Our edge should be in the technology that governs them.
Posted by VOR
New Orleans
Member since Apr 2009
68795 posts
Posted on 7/13/25 at 4:34 pm to
You guys are so obsessed with DEI that there’s no room in your brains for rational thought about anything else…
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
44217 posts
Posted on 7/13/25 at 4:36 pm to
quote:

That's ignorant. You have to look at what your needs are then determine costs to fulfill those needs.


This is like worrying about feed for horses that pull your carriage when you have a perfectly good car with a full tank of gas and a wallet full of cash.

Warfare is changing.

Look weak, then smoke your overconfident enemy.
Posted by HeadCall
Member since Feb 2025
5715 posts
Posted on 7/13/25 at 4:39 pm to
quote:

Intelligent drones have already started to emerge and they have already made a whole lot of armor obsolete.


Drones are all the rage right now but eventually systems will be designed to counter them and so on and so forth. Its the circle of life
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
37265 posts
Posted on 7/13/25 at 4:55 pm to
quote:

Hahaha....the have been flying the F47 for years. The competition wasn't for Boeing or Lockheed to design and build a jet. The USAF designed and built the prototype. The competition was for them to mass produce what the USAF designed.

Yes, test flights. We’re nowhere close to producing them. 4-5 years at least before we even get the first production version.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
37265 posts
Posted on 7/13/25 at 4:55 pm to
quote:

Russia Ukraine Iran etc are absolute jokes of militaries. You are a moron if you think we are lagging them.

Russia Ukraine and Iran are not the concern. Particularly for the navy.
Posted by 1801
Charleston
Member since Aug 2012
8700 posts
Posted on 7/13/25 at 5:12 pm to
quote:

Was this op-ed sponsored by Lockheed-Martin or Boeing?
both -

Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138818 posts
Posted on 7/13/25 at 5:18 pm to
quote:

Outside of strategic values of "presence" if we got into a shooting war with China there arent going to be any blue water naval battles like WW2. They will all be sunk with over the horizon missiles or drone torpedos.
There is but one country that would be smashed by this ... China.The same country that would have to support its Taiwan invasion by sea.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138818 posts
Posted on 7/13/25 at 5:27 pm to
quote:

You guys are so obsessed with DEI
Do you know WTF DEI is?
Serious question.
Because no non-racist, non-chauvinist would ever support DEI, yet you seem to.
Posted by MikkUGA
Destin
Member since Jun 2014
2963 posts
Posted on 7/13/25 at 6:07 pm to
They are not 5 years from production. The prototype has been flying for years. They are ready to roll right now. They awarded the contract because they are ready for production now.
Posted by GeauxBurrow312
Member since Nov 2024
6265 posts
Posted on 7/13/25 at 6:21 pm to
China fudges their numbers on their military build up. They also have 250x the ship production capacity.

We have nicer shite, but quantity will win out. Russia has been slowly grinding down Ukraine with shittier but significantly more weapons and manpower
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
37265 posts
Posted on 7/13/25 at 6:31 pm to
quote:

The prototype has been flying for years. They are ready to roll right now. They awarded the contract because they are ready for production now.

There isn’t even a chance of first flight of a production model until 2029. And that’s one plane.
Posted by MikkUGA
Destin
Member since Jun 2014
2963 posts
Posted on 7/13/25 at 7:05 pm to
So the first production F22 started in June 1995 and its first flight was September of 1997. Somehow though 30 years later with the advancements in computers and robotics its suppose to take twice as long. Yea, ok.
Posted by MikkUGA
Destin
Member since Jun 2014
2963 posts
Posted on 7/13/25 at 7:09 pm to
Deleted
This post was edited on 7/13/25 at 7:27 pm
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
37265 posts
Posted on 7/13/25 at 7:13 pm to
You understand that the 2029 date was announced, right?
Posted by MikkUGA
Destin
Member since Jun 2014
2963 posts
Posted on 7/13/25 at 7:14 pm to
We currently have 3 nuclear Ford class aircraft carriers being built. Which will put us at 14. China just got their 3rd. They have a long way to go to catch up.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
37265 posts
Posted on 7/13/25 at 7:14 pm to
quote:

So the first production F22 started in June 1995 and its first flight was September of 1997. Somehow though 30 years later with the advancements in computers and robotics it’s suppose to take twice as long. Yea, ok.

That conundrum has been my point in the entire thread. Navy, Army, AF, all of it takes absolutely forever now to get anything built.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
37265 posts
Posted on 7/13/25 at 7:16 pm to
quote:

We currently have 3 nuclear Ford class aircraft carriers being built. Which will put us at 14. China just got their 3rd. They have a long way to go to catch up.

The Nimitz’s are being retired 1:1 with the Fords. We’re staying at 11.

We’re still two years out on the Kennedy, and they started in 2015/16. The Enterprise will be early 2030’s at best.

Our total number is also deceptive, as no more than 5 and sometimes 6 are available at any given time.

This post was edited on 7/13/25 at 7:21 pm
Posted by Zgeo
Baja Oklahoma
Member since Jul 2021
3677 posts
Posted on 7/13/25 at 7:23 pm to
Search assist says this about the USAF
The United States Air Force (USAF) operates the largest military aviation fleet globally, with 5,004 active aircraft in 2025, including fighters, bombers, helicopters, and transport planes. The fleet is continuously modernized, with 2,227 new aircraft on order, such as the F-35A Lightning II and B-21A Raider, to maintain technological superiority. Aviation A2Z Wikipedia
Overview of USAF Aircraft
The United States Air Force (USAF) operates the largest and most advanced military aviation fleet in the world, with a total of 5,004 active aircraft as of 2025. This diverse inventory includes various types of aircraft designed for specific missions.
Types of Aircraft
Fighter Aircraft
Total Units: 1,610
Purpose: Air-to-air combat and air superiority
Notable Models: F-22A, F-35A, F-15EX
Bomber Aircraft
Total Units: 76 B-52H, 19 B-2A
Purpose: Strategic bombing and precision strikes
Future Additions: 100 B-21A Raider bombers
Transport and Support Aircraft
Total Units: 222 C-17A, 41 C-130J
Purpose: Troop and cargo transport, aerial refueling
Notable Models: KC-46A Pegasus
Trainer Aircraft
Total Units: 495 T-38A/T-38C
Purpose: Pilot training
Future Replacement: T-7A Red Hawk
Special-Mission Aircraft
Total Units: Various, including reconnaissance and electronic warfare
Purpose: Specialized operations such as surveillance and jamming
Readiness and Modernization
The USAF maintains high readiness rates across its fleet, with thousands of aircraft available for operations. Additionally, there are 2,227 aircraft on order to modernize and enhance capabilities, ensuring the USAF remains at the forefront of military aviation technology.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram