- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
WSJ joins Sara Carter, Rush, Etc in Reporting on FBI SPY
Posted on 5/10/18 at 9:33 pm
Posted on 5/10/18 at 9:33 pm
This is going to be big.
LINK
quote:
Among them is that the Justice Department and Federal Bureau of Investigation outright hid critical information from a congressional investigation. In a Thursday press conference, Speaker Paul Ryan bluntly noted that Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes’s request for details on this secret source was “wholly appropriate,” “completely within the scope” of the committee’s long-running FBI investigation, and “something that probably should have been answered a while ago.” Translation: The department knew full well it should have turned this material over to congressional investigators last year, but instead deliberately concealed it. House investigators nonetheless sniffed out a name, and Mr. Nunes in recent weeks issued a letter and a subpoena demanding more details. Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein’s response was to double down—accusing the House of “extortion” and delivering a speech in which he claimed that “declining to open the FBI’s files to review” is a constitutional “duty.” Justice asked the White House to back its stonewall. And it even began spinning that daddy of all superspook arguments—that revealing any detail about this particular asset could result in “loss of human lives.”
LINK
Posted on 5/10/18 at 9:36 pm to rds dc
I wish Sarah would go on Rush. He'd do a better job of interviewing her than Hannity.
Posted on 5/10/18 at 9:38 pm to rds dc
SO the FBI/DOJ can dream up some "national security" bullshite to covers their own asses?
banana republic
and not one GD bit of this would have ever come to light if the bitch had won.
Given all the obama scandals we do know about I wonder what they completely got away with during that 8 years.
Just remember, if/when a dem ever wins again this shite restarts and nobody will ever hear about it because presumably the morons know how to manage e-mails now.
banana republic
and not one GD bit of this would have ever come to light if the bitch had won.
Given all the obama scandals we do know about I wonder what they completely got away with during that 8 years.
Just remember, if/when a dem ever wins again this shite restarts and nobody will ever hear about it because presumably the morons know how to manage e-mails now.
Posted on 5/10/18 at 9:38 pm to rds dc
Juiceterry says it is legal for the fbi to do this (it’s not)
Posted on 5/10/18 at 9:38 pm to rds dc
Your quoted section doesn’t really say anything about this “spy”.
Posted on 5/10/18 at 9:39 pm to indianswim
The Tree of Liberty better be sturdy because it’s going to be busy as hell in the next few years.
Posted on 5/10/18 at 9:39 pm to rds dc
Sessions is going to have to decide soon if he’s going to fire Rosenstein or if he’ll go down with the whole bunch of traitors.
Posted on 5/10/18 at 9:39 pm to Lsupimp
It may get regularly watered by the blood of traitors soon.
Posted on 5/10/18 at 9:40 pm to rds dc
quote:
“declining to open the FBI’s files to review” is a constitutional “duty.”
Who does the FBI work for?
- The people (who elected trump)?
- Congress?
- White House?
Or are they an independent group of unelected government employees who answer to no one?
Posted on 5/10/18 at 9:40 pm to DallasTiger11
quote:
Your quoted section doesn’t really say anything about this “spy”.
There’s a redacted name in docs the DOJ has turned over to Congress that they refuse to disclose. The quoted material is narrating that.
Posted on 5/10/18 at 9:40 pm to DallasTiger11
quote:
Your quoted section doesn’t really say anything about this “spy”.
The Nunes classified memo was concerning the spy. That is what they are referencing.
quote:
House investigators nonetheless sniffed out a name, and Mr. Nunes in recent weeks issued a letter and a subpoena demanding more details. Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein’s response was to double down—accusing the House of “extortion” and delivering a speech in which he claimed that “declining to open the FBI’s files to review” is a constitutional “duty.” Justice asked the White House to back its stonewall. And it even began spinning that daddy of all superspook arguments—that revealing any detail about this particular asset could result in “loss of human lives.”
This post was edited on 5/10/18 at 9:42 pm
Posted on 5/10/18 at 9:41 pm to HempHead
Wait a second, the fbi paid a mole to work on trump campaign?
Hold up. No they didn’t.
Hold up. No they didn’t.
Posted on 5/10/18 at 9:41 pm to rds dc
Firing squad on live TV
This is the only answer at this point.
This is the only answer at this point.
Posted on 5/10/18 at 9:42 pm to Lsuchs
Supposedly they work for the executive branch.
In practice they seem to be taking a page from the Pakistani ISI and going into business for themselves.
In practice they seem to be taking a page from the Pakistani ISI and going into business for themselves.
Posted on 5/10/18 at 9:42 pm to AUX3
quote:
Wait a second, the fbi paid a mole to work on trump campaign?
Hold up. No they didn’t.
I don't know. That's why I'm asking for the source without a paywall.
Christ Alive, all of this shite happens so fast and often without any substantial corroboration that I don't know my arse from my elbow half of the time.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News