- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: WSJ: Friend Rejects Claim That Ford Helped Her on Polygraph Test
Posted on 10/3/18 at 10:25 am to tigerinDC09
Posted on 10/3/18 at 10:25 am to tigerinDC09
quote:
The friend wasn't identified in the ex-boyfriend's letter, but Dr. Ford's legal team said Ms. McLean was the woman.
Ummm, if the ex never identified the woman, and McLean denies she ever got coaching from Ford, then how did the legal team know it was McLean?
ETA: wrote response before reading other posts with same conclusion.
This post was edited on 10/3/18 at 10:29 am
1
Posted on 10/3/18 at 10:25 am to the808bass
This polygraph is just the first bit of her contradictory testimony to fall, IMO.
Posted on 10/3/18 at 10:25 am to Wolf Messing
quote:
think people would rather them just say what they think (repubs), that they don't mind that a raging drunk who has sexually assaulted women in the past be nominated to the SC as long as he upholds their beliefs.
Posted on 10/3/18 at 10:25 am to Wolf Messing
quote:
I think people would rather them just say what they think (repubs), that they don't mind that a raging drunk who has sexually assaulted women in the past be nominated to the SC as long as he upholds their beliefs.
Well, I’d rather you guys just admit that you oppose voter ID laws because you’re in favor of voter fraud.
At least THAT would be true.
Posted on 10/3/18 at 10:26 am to mtntiger
quote:
if the ex never identified the woman, and McLean denies she ever got coaching from Ford, then how did the legal team know it was McLean?
Because WSJ is wrong. Her identity was released.
Posted on 10/3/18 at 10:26 am to HailToTheChiz
quote:
The friend wasn't identified in the ex-boyfriend's letter,
Sure she was. We knew her name and were able to confirm she indeed worked for the FBI since the letter came out.
Posted on 10/3/18 at 10:32 am to GRTiger
Ok, fine. The boyfriend lied. Now, can we vote?
Posted on 10/3/18 at 10:32 am to CharlesLSU
quote:
I simply come here to troll you folks.
Posted on 10/3/18 at 10:34 am to GRTiger
If she worked for the fbi and she admitted to being coached for her entrance fbi polygraph when in fact she would of had to deny it during her fbi polygraph she knows this would be a shite storm.
In essence she would be admitting she lied during her applicant polygraph which the fbi would then have to look at all her dealings in every case she was involved in. Any defense attorney would be loving her being involved in any old case.
She can not admit she was coache ever under oath because for a fact she has demied it in her applicant polygraph.
So she has way more incentive to deny this than some ex lover. It’s her whole career that could be called into question.
In essence she would be admitting she lied during her applicant polygraph which the fbi would then have to look at all her dealings in every case she was involved in. Any defense attorney would be loving her being involved in any old case.
She can not admit she was coache ever under oath because for a fact she has demied it in her applicant polygraph.
So she has way more incentive to deny this than some ex lover. It’s her whole career that could be called into question.
Posted on 10/3/18 at 10:34 am to tigerinDC09
Catch all of them in their perjury and bring the whole rotten edifice down
Posted on 10/3/18 at 10:36 am to CharlesLSU
quote:
Dude, posting anything on this board beyond the DT Circle jerk gets the natives all in a tizzy.....hell, even the admins are in on it.
Nailed it. This will be downloaded to oblivion. But even those who downvote know it’s the truth.
Posted on 10/3/18 at 10:37 am to tigerinDC09
Wow, now we have the PT Libs saying allegations without corroboration are worthless and are being used as an ax to grind? Keep moving those goal posts boys, girls and he-shes!
Posted on 10/3/18 at 10:37 am to CharlesLSU
quote:
simply come here to troll you folks.
you're not very good at it
Posted on 10/3/18 at 10:38 am to ABearsFanNMS
It was sworn testimony he sent in
But don't tell them that
But don't tell them that
Posted on 10/3/18 at 10:39 am to CharlesLSU
Let me get this quoted so it is on the record and can be entered into your permanent file:
calling out the admins, bold move
admitting to trolling the board, interesting strategy
professing contempt for the board
Oh Charles you scamp, what are we going to do with you?
quote:
Dude, posting anything on this board beyond the DT Circle jerk gets the natives all in a tizzy.....hell, even the admins are in on it.
calling out the admins, bold move
quote:
lol.....brah, this board is 99% Trumpcuckins with their heads so far up their political asses, they've beaten gravity. I simply come here to troll you folks.
admitting to trolling the board, interesting strategy
quote:
the day I get affirmation here, is the day I fail at being a decent human being.....
professing contempt for the board
Oh Charles you scamp, what are we going to do with you?
Posted on 10/3/18 at 10:39 am to ABearsFanNMS
quote:
Wow, now we have the PT Libs saying allegations without corroboration are worthless and are being used as an ax to grind? Keep moving those goal posts boys, girls and he-shes!
That is my favorite part of this thread.
Not only are they touting this, but mocking anyone who disagrees.
So typical.
Posted on 10/3/18 at 10:40 am to tigerinDC09
quote:So now you're just assuming facts??
They likely only have one mutual friend who took a polygraph.
Posted on 10/3/18 at 10:41 am to Wolf Messing
quote:
that they don't mind that a raging drunk who has sexually assaulted women in the past
Proof or gtfo
Posted on 10/3/18 at 10:45 am to tigerinDC09
It will be interesting if they can cross reference the date they lived together and the date she took the FBI polygraph. That my Dem friends is what we call corroborating evidence.
Posted on 10/3/18 at 10:46 am to McChowder
Yeah. His statement has 200% more detail and ability to be corroroborated than hers did.
Page 5 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News