- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Wow! They Finally got to Tom Hanks in the files! It's Horrible!
Posted on 2/15/26 at 7:04 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 2/15/26 at 7:04 am to SlowFlowPro
I never pivoted. This effort is punishing the guilty in the only way information can after the statute of limitations has expired.
Why did you pick a menstrual product for a screen name?
Why did you pick a menstrual product for a screen name?
1
Posted on 2/15/26 at 7:05 am to OccamsStubble
quote:
This effort is punishing the guilty
Guilty of...what, exactly?
What guilt do these emails imply about Tom Hanks?
quote:
Why did you pick a menstrual product for a screen name?
I didn't. It's a musical reference to a rapper from Houston.
Posted on 2/15/26 at 7:07 am to OccamsStubble
No, I don't believe it's that at all.
This post was edited on 2/15/26 at 7:08 am
Posted on 2/15/26 at 7:11 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Guilty of...what, exactly?
Statutory rape
quote:
What guilt do these emails imply about Tom Hanks?
Nothing considering there’s no confirmation he ever went to EI
Posted on 2/15/26 at 7:12 am to FLTech
FL Tech, your loyalty cannot be questioned. You are a bullet proof patriot. But sometimes you get a little further out over your ski’s.
Get one of us to check and confirm. We all know TH is the worst of the worst. But we have to talke pure precision strikes.
Get one of us to check and confirm. We all know TH is the worst of the worst. But we have to talke pure precision strikes.
Posted on 2/15/26 at 7:13 am to OccamsStubble
quote:
Nothing considering there’s no confirmation he ever went to EI
So why are you celebrating Tom Hanks being named if there is no evidence of him committing any crime/guilt?
Are you punishing the "guilty" or are you just engaging in witch hunts based on nothing more than associating with Epstein socially?
Posted on 2/15/26 at 7:14 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:Are there emails?
What guilt do these emails imply about Tom Hanks?
Posted on 2/15/26 at 7:18 am to NC_Tigah
I was going to look but due to formatting/coding issues with Outlook, every "thanks" in the emails is "=hanks" and that makes searching difficult
Posted on 2/15/26 at 7:19 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
So why are you celebrating Tom Hanks being named if there is no evidence of him committing any crime/guilt?
I’m not, I can’t see that he has done anything wrong
Posted on 2/15/26 at 7:20 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
These exchanges paint a disturbing picture of Hanks tapping into Epstein's network of elite connections for guidance that goes far beyond mere real estate curiosity, raising alarms about the potential motives behind such consultations.
A man who is looking into doing the Castaway thing, which I bet most of us have entertained at one time or another, is asking another man who DOES have his own island on the real world hurtles of infrastructure, power, waste, etc...
quote:
Eyewitness accounts embedded in the files further compound the horror, detailing Hanks' visits to Epstein's infamous Little St. James island on at least two occasions during the same period.
Horror? Because...what? There's still nothing there that ties Hanks to Epstein's infamous antics.
quote:
Described in redacted logs as "discreet meetings," these trips occurred amid Epstein's well documented operations involving high profile figures and illicit activities. The emails explicitly reference Epstein's own island as a "model" for Hanks' aspirations, with discussions on evading regulatory scrutiny and establishing self sustaining infrastructures.
Yeah, they met on an island, which is something Tom Hanks would want to do if he's serious about looking into if he's interested in living on an ISLAND!
Make it make sense!
Posted on 2/15/26 at 7:22 am to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
Yeah, they met on an island, which is something Tom Hanks would want to do if he's serious about looking into if he's interested in living on an ISLAND!
Make it make sense!
It doesn't make sense. It's a witch hunt, which is an irrational event.
All of these people resigning b/c they are associated with Epstein in non-nefarious ways are victims of this witch hunt, too.
I didn't imply Trump did anything illegal with Epstein based on simply being associated with him, and I won't start engaging in that with others.
Posted on 2/15/26 at 7:24 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:Did Bondi not publish all the associated names? If Hanks had so much as one Epstein correspondence, wouldn't his name be on the list?
I was going to look but due to formatting/coding issues with Outlook, every "thanks" in the emails is "=hanks" and that makes searching difficult
Posted on 2/15/26 at 7:30 am to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
Make it make sense!
Can’t, because it’s sarcasm/satire
Posted on 2/15/26 at 7:30 am to NC_Tigah
I don't think that lost you posted would apply. Those look to be names that aren't directly relevant to anything directly related to Epstein. Since Hank's actively emailed Epstein, he would have a direct connection so I don't know why he would be on that list. That's how I read the description. At least. Posting only one page leaves out a lot of context of the total information presented in the document.
Posted on 2/15/26 at 7:39 am to OccamsStubble
It does read like that to me, but folks react to key words differently when there's a narrative to be pushed.
I get it. Folks don't like seeing beloved icons and dragged through the mud. Whoopi Goldberg famously defended Bill Cosby for much of the same reasons. He'd been a fixture in the industry for decades, had a clean, wholesome image on camera, and being a black pioneer into making it big in Hollywood wasn't something to casually overlook.
But setting up Tom Hanks in a like manner without any credible evidence can put him in the same category as Cosby. Which would be a tragedy.
I get it. Folks don't like seeing beloved icons and dragged through the mud. Whoopi Goldberg famously defended Bill Cosby for much of the same reasons. He'd been a fixture in the industry for decades, had a clean, wholesome image on camera, and being a black pioneer into making it big in Hollywood wasn't something to casually overlook.
But setting up Tom Hanks in a like manner without any credible evidence can put him in the same category as Cosby. Which would be a tragedy.
Posted on 2/15/26 at 7:46 am to Tantal
quote:
Don't get me wrong, I think Hanks is a POS,
I have never paid any attention to Hollywood script talkers unless they've done something heroic or particularly felonous.
But I did have a good impression of Tom Hanks based on the lack of sensational info or their sticking their nosed into things they have no expertise in.
So what makes Hanks so bad?
Posted on 2/15/26 at 7:57 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I don't think that lost you posted would apply.
methinks NCT made that post in jest
Posted on 2/15/26 at 8:08 am to FLTech
Hanks went to Greece for a reason 6 years ago and we all knew what it was back then
But don't worry, our trusting on Sessions will come to fruition one day
But don't worry, our trusting on Sessions will come to fruition one day
This post was edited on 2/15/26 at 8:09 am
Posted on 2/15/26 at 8:11 am to NC_Tigah
where is the other 60% of that list? It's in alphabetical order and ends with J.
Posted on 2/15/26 at 8:14 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Those look to be names that aren't directly relevant to anything directly related to Epstein. Since Hank's actively emailed Epstein
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News