- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 8/22/25 at 6:44 am to BlackPawnMartyr
quote:
And we are currently siding with Israel who is committing genocide, so we don't get to point fingers.
Define genocide for me. I'd like to hear what you think that word means.
This post was edited on 8/22/25 at 6:46 am
Posted on 8/22/25 at 6:46 am to I20goon
The Ukrainians sided with the Nazis during WW2. Neonazis still exist in Ukraine today.
Loomer and Cruz's Jew first viewpoint make sense if you believe a white Christian is worth approximately 1/5th of a Jew.
The argument was that if the US sides with the Germans, the Holocaust may never have happened and by defeating Stalin millions of other lives would have also been saved.
Millions more if the allies didn't hand control of China over to Mao after the war.
The Jews wouldn't have remained in Germany after the war, sure, but if removing Christians from the ancestral home lands in Gaza, Syria, etc by Israel today is ok, then the same logic would apply to the Germans removal of the Jews post WW2. This would have not been the first time the Jews were removed from the territory of one of the allies in this scenario.
Loomer and Cruz's Jew first viewpoint make sense if you believe a white Christian is worth approximately 1/5th of a Jew.
The argument was that if the US sides with the Germans, the Holocaust may never have happened and by defeating Stalin millions of other lives would have also been saved.
Millions more if the allies didn't hand control of China over to Mao after the war.
The Jews wouldn't have remained in Germany after the war, sure, but if removing Christians from the ancestral home lands in Gaza, Syria, etc by Israel today is ok, then the same logic would apply to the Germans removal of the Jews post WW2. This would have not been the first time the Jews were removed from the territory of one of the allies in this scenario.
Posted on 8/22/25 at 6:49 am to i am dan
quote:
Define genocide for me. I'd like to hear what you think that word means.
Is this the place I go to believe Hamas is purposefully starving their next generation of fighters in an attempt to win a propaganda war against a race that owns the global media?
Posted on 8/22/25 at 6:54 am to SlayTime
They will say that Gaza doesn't count because it is a mixture of Christians and Muslims who have some how lived together for centuries. Of course this population and Hamas is indistinguishable for them.
Genocide is about race not religion. So was Hitler right and the Jews are a race or is the rest of the worlds classification of Judaism
as a religion only correct?
Genocide is about race not religion. So was Hitler right and the Jews are a race or is the rest of the worlds classification of Judaism
as a religion only correct?
Posted on 8/22/25 at 6:54 am to SlayTime
Lmao, your minds have been broken
Posted on 8/22/25 at 7:03 am to Madking
quote:
Lmao, your minds have been broken
Ok Boomer. I’ll pray to my King currently residing in boiling excrement to help me find my Judeo Christian morals.
Posted on 8/22/25 at 7:07 am to GumboPot
Germany declared war on us, FWIW.
Posted on 8/22/25 at 7:12 am to SCLibertarian
quote:
don't think it's controversial to say that the Soviets were objectively worse than the Nazis.
We had our choice of two monsters.
Posted on 8/22/25 at 7:22 am to Madking
quote:
I rest my case
I don’t want to debate anymore so I’ll pretend I’ve proved something I haven’t.
Nobody falls for this shite anymore retard.
Posted on 8/22/25 at 7:25 am to i am dan
quote:
Define genocide for me.
It’s simple. Eradicating an ethnic tribe or religious tribe by killing them to take their property.
The debate is about the rate of eradication and intent.
Hiroshima was big and quick but the intention was to end a war so not a genocide.
Holocaust was a genocide. It took longer than Hiroshima and the Germans stole property.
The Zionists are committing a genocide in Gaza today. They are killing an ethnic group to take their property at little slower pace than the Holocaust.
This post was edited on 8/22/25 at 7:28 am
Posted on 8/22/25 at 7:30 am to Philzilla2k
quote:
Also, Hitler declared war on the US.
He FAFO.
Right.
We had to side with England because of our deep ancestorial ties anyway. Plus getting into the war was a good way of leaving Great Depression economics behind. We had a big economic incentive to dive in.
Posted on 8/22/25 at 7:33 am to GumboPot
quote:
Right. We had to side with England because of our deep ancestorial ties anyway. Plus getting into the war was a good way of leaving Great Depression economics behind. We had a big economic incentive to dive in.
Take your logical, critical thinking summary elsewhere, this is a feels thread.
Posted on 8/22/25 at 7:45 am to GumboPot
Hindsight is 20/20
But Germany was allied with Japan and Japan attacked us then Germany declared war so not much choice at that point.
Now before the war we weren’t hostile to Nazi Germany. There were a lot of Nazi supporters in the U.S. at that point. Jews weren’t much liked here, even FDR turned away boatloads of Jewish refugees from Germany.
When Germany started hostilities in Europe we were neutral until they went to war with our allies France and the UK. Even then we didn’t enter the war but we sided with UK and France by supplying weapons and supplies so we definitely chose sides at that point.
Now if the war was simply Germany attacking the communists to the East and left Western Europe alone, I think we would have ended up backing that effort. Germany brought it on themself and I don’t see how we could have sided with that regime once they started hostilities and definitely not after Pearl Harbor. Both Nazis and communists were bad and by the death total the communists were worse.
My opinion on the matter is we were right to side with Western Europe against the Nazis. However, I think we should have went ahead and defeated the Soviets immediately after Berlin fell while they were weakened and we had nukes and they didn’t
But Germany was allied with Japan and Japan attacked us then Germany declared war so not much choice at that point.
Now before the war we weren’t hostile to Nazi Germany. There were a lot of Nazi supporters in the U.S. at that point. Jews weren’t much liked here, even FDR turned away boatloads of Jewish refugees from Germany.
When Germany started hostilities in Europe we were neutral until they went to war with our allies France and the UK. Even then we didn’t enter the war but we sided with UK and France by supplying weapons and supplies so we definitely chose sides at that point.
Now if the war was simply Germany attacking the communists to the East and left Western Europe alone, I think we would have ended up backing that effort. Germany brought it on themself and I don’t see how we could have sided with that regime once they started hostilities and definitely not after Pearl Harbor. Both Nazis and communists were bad and by the death total the communists were worse.
My opinion on the matter is we were right to side with Western Europe against the Nazis. However, I think we should have went ahead and defeated the Soviets immediately after Berlin fell while they were weakened and we had nukes and they didn’t
Posted on 8/22/25 at 7:47 am to GumboPot
Stalin killed millions more than Hitler.
So, why Hitler gets all the glory is beyond me.
So, why Hitler gets all the glory is beyond me.
Posted on 8/22/25 at 7:48 am to i am dan
quote:
Define genocide for me. I'd like to hear what you think that word means.
Hard to understand that simply studying history proves that this is only going to end in a genocide.
Either for Gaza or the Israelis.
Posted on 8/22/25 at 7:51 am to GumboPot
FDR taking Jewish refugees would have prevented the holocaust
FDR refused requests to take in large numbers of European Jews.
One of the many reasons he is certainly burning in hell
FDR refused requests to take in large numbers of European Jews.
One of the many reasons he is certainly burning in hell
Posted on 8/22/25 at 7:54 am to TrueTiger
quote:
We had our choice of two monsters.
We objectively chose the worst one. And lots of people said as much at the time.
If the goal of stopping Hitler was to allow for a sovereign Europe and a free Poland, we objectively failed. Europe fell to the iron curtain, Poland was occupied by the Godless Soviets, and Europe is ruled by autocrats in Brussels.
The Third Reich was objectively a better choice than what we had. Patton was correct - which is why he had to be killed.
Popular
Back to top


2




