Started By
Message

re: Would have siding with Hitler prevented the Holocaust? Ted Cruz weighing in now.

Posted on 8/22/25 at 6:39 am to
Posted by Philzilla2k
Member since Oct 2017
12433 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 6:39 am to
Also, Hitler declared war on the US.
He FAFO.
Posted by i am dan
NC
Member since Aug 2011
30540 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 6:44 am to
quote:

And we are currently siding with Israel who is committing genocide, so we don't get to point fingers.

Define genocide for me. I'd like to hear what you think that word means.
This post was edited on 8/22/25 at 6:46 am
Posted by DaleDenton
Member since Jun 2010
43526 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 6:46 am to
The Ukrainians sided with the Nazis during WW2. Neonazis still exist in Ukraine today.

Loomer and Cruz's Jew first viewpoint make sense if you believe a white Christian is worth approximately 1/5th of a Jew.

The argument was that if the US sides with the Germans, the Holocaust may never have happened and by defeating Stalin millions of other lives would have also been saved.

Millions more if the allies didn't hand control of China over to Mao after the war.

The Jews wouldn't have remained in Germany after the war, sure, but if removing Christians from the ancestral home lands in Gaza, Syria, etc by Israel today is ok, then the same logic would apply to the Germans removal of the Jews post WW2. This would have not been the first time the Jews were removed from the territory of one of the allies in this scenario.
Posted by SlayTime
Member since Jan 2025
3738 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 6:49 am to
quote:

Define genocide for me. I'd like to hear what you think that word means.


Is this the place I go to believe Hamas is purposefully starving their next generation of fighters in an attempt to win a propaganda war against a race that owns the global media?


Posted by DaleDenton
Member since Jun 2010
43526 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 6:54 am to
They will say that Gaza doesn't count because it is a mixture of Christians and Muslims who have some how lived together for centuries. Of course this population and Hamas is indistinguishable for them.

Genocide is about race not religion. So was Hitler right and the Jews are a race or is the rest of the worlds classification of Judaism
as a religion only correct?

Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
66696 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 6:54 am to
Lmao, your minds have been broken
Posted by CitizenK
BR
Member since Aug 2019
13938 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 7:00 am to
Dumb idea from retards
Posted by SlayTime
Member since Jan 2025
3738 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 7:03 am to
quote:

Lmao, your minds have been broken


Ok Boomer. I’ll pray to my King currently residing in boiling excrement to help me find my Judeo Christian morals.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
35779 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 7:07 am to
Germany declared war on us, FWIW.
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
66696 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 7:10 am to
I rest my case
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
80200 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 7:12 am to
quote:

don't think it's controversial to say that the Soviets were objectively worse than the Nazis.



We had our choice of two monsters.
Posted by SlayTime
Member since Jan 2025
3738 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 7:22 am to
quote:

I rest my case


I don’t want to debate anymore so I’ll pretend I’ve proved something I haven’t.

Nobody falls for this shite anymore retard.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
138911 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 7:25 am to
quote:

Define genocide for me.


It’s simple. Eradicating an ethnic tribe or religious tribe by killing them to take their property.

The debate is about the rate of eradication and intent.

Hiroshima was big and quick but the intention was to end a war so not a genocide.

Holocaust was a genocide. It took longer than Hiroshima and the Germans stole property.

The Zionists are committing a genocide in Gaza today. They are killing an ethnic group to take their property at little slower pace than the Holocaust.

This post was edited on 8/22/25 at 7:28 am
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
138911 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 7:30 am to
quote:

Also, Hitler declared war on the US.
He FAFO.


Right.

We had to side with England because of our deep ancestorial ties anyway. Plus getting into the war was a good way of leaving Great Depression economics behind. We had a big economic incentive to dive in.
Posted by SlayTime
Member since Jan 2025
3738 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 7:33 am to
quote:

Right. We had to side with England because of our deep ancestorial ties anyway. Plus getting into the war was a good way of leaving Great Depression economics behind. We had a big economic incentive to dive in.


Take your logical, critical thinking summary elsewhere, this is a feels thread.
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
100624 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 7:45 am to
Hindsight is 20/20


But Germany was allied with Japan and Japan attacked us then Germany declared war so not much choice at that point.

Now before the war we weren’t hostile to Nazi Germany. There were a lot of Nazi supporters in the U.S. at that point. Jews weren’t much liked here, even FDR turned away boatloads of Jewish refugees from Germany.


When Germany started hostilities in Europe we were neutral until they went to war with our allies France and the UK. Even then we didn’t enter the war but we sided with UK and France by supplying weapons and supplies so we definitely chose sides at that point.


Now if the war was simply Germany attacking the communists to the East and left Western Europe alone, I think we would have ended up backing that effort. Germany brought it on themself and I don’t see how we could have sided with that regime once they started hostilities and definitely not after Pearl Harbor. Both Nazis and communists were bad and by the death total the communists were worse.


My opinion on the matter is we were right to side with Western Europe against the Nazis. However, I think we should have went ahead and defeated the Soviets immediately after Berlin fell while they were weakened and we had nukes and they didn’t
Posted by Errerrerrwere
Member since Aug 2015
43232 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 7:47 am to
Stalin killed millions more than Hitler.

So, why Hitler gets all the glory is beyond me.
Posted by Errerrerrwere
Member since Aug 2015
43232 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 7:48 am to
quote:

Define genocide for me. I'd like to hear what you think that word means.


Hard to understand that simply studying history proves that this is only going to end in a genocide.

Either for Gaza or the Israelis.
Posted by Hayekian serf
GA
Member since Dec 2020
4036 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 7:51 am to
FDR taking Jewish refugees would have prevented the holocaust


FDR refused requests to take in large numbers of European Jews.

One of the many reasons he is certainly burning in hell
Posted by RoyalAir
Detroit
Member since Dec 2012
7279 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 7:54 am to
quote:

We had our choice of two monsters.


We objectively chose the worst one. And lots of people said as much at the time.

If the goal of stopping Hitler was to allow for a sovereign Europe and a free Poland, we objectively failed. Europe fell to the iron curtain, Poland was occupied by the Godless Soviets, and Europe is ruled by autocrats in Brussels.

The Third Reich was objectively a better choice than what we had. Patton was correct - which is why he had to be killed.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram