- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Worth a read; Charles Krauthammer
Posted on 6/29/26 at 4:09 am
Posted on 6/29/26 at 4:09 am
“How right Charles Krauthammer was on his take on Trump when he first wrote this column in March 2018 before his death. To my friends ‘of a different persuasion,’ I'm not trying to sell anything or anyone, but I do feel this is an interesting take on our very controversial president who I truly believe is not Republican or Democrat.” ~ Harris Gardner
A TAKE ON DONALD TRUMP
By Charles Krauthammer
A different take on Donald Trump: (a non-political agenda)
Trump Is Not A Liberal or Conservative, He's a "Pragmatist." (Definition: A pragmatist is someone who is practical and focused on reaching a goal. A pragmatist usually has a straightforward, matter-of-fact approach and doesn't let emotion distract him or her.)
"We recently enjoyed a belated holiday dinner with friends at the home of other friends. The dinner conversation varied from discussions about antique glass and china to theology and politics.
At one point, reference was made to Donald Trump being a conservative, to which I responded that Trump is not a conservative.
I said that I neither view nor do I believe Trump views himself as a conservative. I stated it was my opinion that Trump is a pragmatist. He sees a problem and understands it must be fixed. He doesn't see the problem as liberal or conservative, he sees it only as a problem. That is a quality that should be admired and applauded, not condemned. But I get ahead of myself.
Viewing problems from a Liberal perspective has resulted in the creation of more problems, more entitlement programs, more victims, more government, more political correctness, and more attacks on the working class in all economic strata.
Viewing things according to the so-called Republican conservative perspective has brought continued spending and globalism to the detriment of American interests and well being, denial of what the real problems are, weak, ineffective, milquetoast, leadership that amounts to Barney Fife Deputy Sheriff, appeasement oriented and afraid of its own shadow. In brief, it has brought liberal ideology with a pachyderm as a mascot juxtaposed to the arse of the Democrat Party.
Immigration isn't a Republican problem, it isn't a Liberal problem, it is a problem that threatens the very fabric and infrastructure of America. It demands a pragmatic approach not an approach that is intended to appease one group or another.
The impending collapse of the economy wasn't a Liberal or Conservative problem, it is an American problem. That said, until it is viewed as a problem that demands a common sense approach to resolution, it will never be fixed because the Democrats and Republicans know only one way to fix things and the longevity of their impracticality has proven to have no lasting effect.
Successful businessmen like Donald Trump find ways to make things work, they do not promise to accommodate.
Trump uniquely understands that China's manipulation of currency is not a Republican problem or a Democrat problem. It is a problem that threatens our financial stability and he understands the proper balance needed to fix it.
Here again, successful businessmen, like Trump, who have weathered the changing tides of economic reality understand what is necessary to make business work, and they, unlike both sides of the political aisle, know that if something doesn't work, you don't continue trying to make it work hoping that at some point it will.
As a pragmatist, Donald Trump hasn't made wild pie-in-the-sky promises of a cell phone in every pocket, free college tuition, and a $15 hour minimum wage for working the drive-through at Carl's Hamburgers.
I argue that America needs pragmatists because pragmatists see a problem and find ways to fix them. They do not see a problem and compound it by creating more problems.
You may not like Donald Trump, but I suspect that the reason some people do not like him is because:
(1) he is antithetical to the "good old boy" method of brokering back room deals that fatten the coffers of politicians;
(2) they are unaccustomed to hearing a president speak who is unencumbered
by the financial shackles of those who he owes vis-a-vis donations;
(3) he is someone who is free of idiomatic political ideology;
(4) he says what he is thinking, is unapologetic for his outspoken thoughts, speaks very straightforward using everyday language that can be understood by all (and is offensive to some who dislike him anyway) making him a great communicator, for the most part, does what he says he will do and;
(5) he is someone who understands that it takes more than hollow promises and political correctness to make America great again.
Listening to Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders talk about fixing America is like listening to two lunatics trying to "out crazy" one another. Jeb Bush, John Kasich and Marco Rubio are owned lock, stock, and barrel by the bankers, corporations, and big dollar donors funding their campaigns. Bush can deny it, but common sense tells anyone willing to face facts is that people don't give tens of millions without expecting something in return.
We have had Democrats and Republican ideologues and what has it brought us?
Are we better off today or worse off? Has it happened overnight or has it been a steady decline brought on by both parties?
I submit that a pragmatist is just what America needs right now. People are quick to confuse and despise confidence as arrogance, but that is common among those who have never accomplished anything in their lives (or politicians who never really solved a problem, because it's better to still have an "issue(s) to be solved," so re-elect me to solve it, (which never happens) and those who have always played it safe (again, all politicians) not willing to risk failure, to try and achieve success).
Donald Trump put his total financial empire at risk in running for president and certainly did not need or possibly even want the job; that says it all.
He wants success for the U.S. and her citizens because he loves his country.
God Bless America
~ Dr. Charles
A TAKE ON DONALD TRUMP
By Charles Krauthammer
A different take on Donald Trump: (a non-political agenda)
Trump Is Not A Liberal or Conservative, He's a "Pragmatist." (Definition: A pragmatist is someone who is practical and focused on reaching a goal. A pragmatist usually has a straightforward, matter-of-fact approach and doesn't let emotion distract him or her.)
"We recently enjoyed a belated holiday dinner with friends at the home of other friends. The dinner conversation varied from discussions about antique glass and china to theology and politics.
At one point, reference was made to Donald Trump being a conservative, to which I responded that Trump is not a conservative.
I said that I neither view nor do I believe Trump views himself as a conservative. I stated it was my opinion that Trump is a pragmatist. He sees a problem and understands it must be fixed. He doesn't see the problem as liberal or conservative, he sees it only as a problem. That is a quality that should be admired and applauded, not condemned. But I get ahead of myself.
Viewing problems from a Liberal perspective has resulted in the creation of more problems, more entitlement programs, more victims, more government, more political correctness, and more attacks on the working class in all economic strata.
Viewing things according to the so-called Republican conservative perspective has brought continued spending and globalism to the detriment of American interests and well being, denial of what the real problems are, weak, ineffective, milquetoast, leadership that amounts to Barney Fife Deputy Sheriff, appeasement oriented and afraid of its own shadow. In brief, it has brought liberal ideology with a pachyderm as a mascot juxtaposed to the arse of the Democrat Party.
Immigration isn't a Republican problem, it isn't a Liberal problem, it is a problem that threatens the very fabric and infrastructure of America. It demands a pragmatic approach not an approach that is intended to appease one group or another.
The impending collapse of the economy wasn't a Liberal or Conservative problem, it is an American problem. That said, until it is viewed as a problem that demands a common sense approach to resolution, it will never be fixed because the Democrats and Republicans know only one way to fix things and the longevity of their impracticality has proven to have no lasting effect.
Successful businessmen like Donald Trump find ways to make things work, they do not promise to accommodate.
Trump uniquely understands that China's manipulation of currency is not a Republican problem or a Democrat problem. It is a problem that threatens our financial stability and he understands the proper balance needed to fix it.
Here again, successful businessmen, like Trump, who have weathered the changing tides of economic reality understand what is necessary to make business work, and they, unlike both sides of the political aisle, know that if something doesn't work, you don't continue trying to make it work hoping that at some point it will.
As a pragmatist, Donald Trump hasn't made wild pie-in-the-sky promises of a cell phone in every pocket, free college tuition, and a $15 hour minimum wage for working the drive-through at Carl's Hamburgers.
I argue that America needs pragmatists because pragmatists see a problem and find ways to fix them. They do not see a problem and compound it by creating more problems.
You may not like Donald Trump, but I suspect that the reason some people do not like him is because:
(1) he is antithetical to the "good old boy" method of brokering back room deals that fatten the coffers of politicians;
(2) they are unaccustomed to hearing a president speak who is unencumbered
by the financial shackles of those who he owes vis-a-vis donations;
(3) he is someone who is free of idiomatic political ideology;
(4) he says what he is thinking, is unapologetic for his outspoken thoughts, speaks very straightforward using everyday language that can be understood by all (and is offensive to some who dislike him anyway) making him a great communicator, for the most part, does what he says he will do and;
(5) he is someone who understands that it takes more than hollow promises and political correctness to make America great again.
Listening to Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders talk about fixing America is like listening to two lunatics trying to "out crazy" one another. Jeb Bush, John Kasich and Marco Rubio are owned lock, stock, and barrel by the bankers, corporations, and big dollar donors funding their campaigns. Bush can deny it, but common sense tells anyone willing to face facts is that people don't give tens of millions without expecting something in return.
We have had Democrats and Republican ideologues and what has it brought us?
Are we better off today or worse off? Has it happened overnight or has it been a steady decline brought on by both parties?
I submit that a pragmatist is just what America needs right now. People are quick to confuse and despise confidence as arrogance, but that is common among those who have never accomplished anything in their lives (or politicians who never really solved a problem, because it's better to still have an "issue(s) to be solved," so re-elect me to solve it, (which never happens) and those who have always played it safe (again, all politicians) not willing to risk failure, to try and achieve success).
Donald Trump put his total financial empire at risk in running for president and certainly did not need or possibly even want the job; that says it all.
He wants success for the U.S. and her citizens because he loves his country.
God Bless America
~ Dr. Charles
Posted on 6/29/26 at 5:08 am to March1st
I think Charles was very accurate on his assessment of Trump. He hit the nail on the head about Republicans and Democrats too. This must be before he went off the rails with TDS.
Posted on 6/29/26 at 5:18 am to Branson
“ This must be before he went off the rails with TDS.”(quote B).
He did? Is there written opinion by Charles suggesting such?
He did? Is there written opinion by Charles suggesting such?
Posted on 6/29/26 at 5:39 am to RCDfan1950
I do remember that he was "appalled" after Charlottesville.
Posted on 6/29/26 at 6:47 am to March1st
quote:
Jeb Bush, John Kasich and Marco Rubio are owned lock, stock, and barrel
I like who Little Marco has become, and I think people can change, but remember this in the next presidential election... those debts don't just go away without being paid
Posted on 6/29/26 at 6:57 am to Branson
Charles would have modified his “appalled” after finding out that Muh Charlottesville “ was an SPLC OP.
Albeit Trump will give equal treatment to both Far Right and Far Left activists.
Albeit Trump will give equal treatment to both Far Right and Far Left activists.
Posted on 6/29/26 at 7:25 am to TuDog
quote:
Only choice we had.
This is where I stand on Trump. I don't personally like his methods but I have to admit, he knows more about a lot of stuff than I do.
He is the President of the US and it's not like anyone can take him out of office on a whim.
Hell, the Democrats have tried with their hair on fire with impeachments and none of it worked. Not a single one of them.
That says something to me mostly is that if they hate him, he must be doing something right.
I question him and he infuriates me but I've never hated the guy. I have no choice but to support him.
The problems that Democrats and RINOs are trying to solve:
Avocado and toast prices
Muh racism
People not nice to gays, trannies and liberal white women
Muh gas prices (we've yet to go over what they were when Biden was in)
Real problems:
Iran with nukes
China fricking with our currency
Muslim and pajeet invasion
Other illegals
40T deficit
Pink military
Who else is even trying to fix any of the problems we have in this country besides him? No one. Not a single person except probably JDV and Rubio.
This post was edited on 6/29/26 at 7:30 am
Posted on 6/29/26 at 7:40 am to March1st
krapheimer worked as a policy advisor on the mondale campaign in 84 he was a life long democrat pretending to be conservative.
glad he's dead.
glad he's dead.
Posted on 6/29/26 at 8:13 am to March1st
What Krauthammer finally realized
And of course he died before Jan 6, the rat frick disaster that was COVID, and all of the clear examples of graft were on open display. I imagine none of these things would have warmed CK’s heart to Drumpf.
And of course he died before Jan 6, the rat frick disaster that was COVID, and all of the clear examples of graft were on open display. I imagine none of these things would have warmed CK’s heart to Drumpf.
Posted on 6/29/26 at 8:35 am to March1st
I think that’s a good take, but there are three whoppers in there.
1.
No tax on tips; Tariff rebates?
2.
Geez! If Trump is not arrogant then no one has ever been arrogant.
3.
Donald Trump burned for the job with the strength of ten thousand suns.
1.
quote:
As a pragmatist, Donald Trump hasn't made wild pie-in-the-sky promises of a cell phone in every pocket, free college tuition, and a $15 hour minimum wage for working the drive-through at Carl's Hamburgers.
No tax on tips; Tariff rebates?
2.
quote:
People are quick to confuse and despise confidence as arrogance
Geez! If Trump is not arrogant then no one has ever been arrogant.
3.
quote:
Donald Trump put his total financial empire at risk in running for president and certainly did not need or possibly even want the job
Donald Trump burned for the job with the strength of ten thousand suns.
Posted on 6/29/26 at 8:36 am to dickkellog
quote:
krapheimer worked as a policy advisor on the mondale campaign in 84 he was a life long democrat pretending to be conservative.
No he wasn’t, boy!
Back to top
6







