- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Women in Combat: What say you?
Posted on 1/16/25 at 8:40 am to Scruffy
Posted on 1/16/25 at 8:40 am to Scruffy
quote:
If they can meet the exact same standards as their male counterparts and the standards aren’t lowered to allow for this.
The truly disturbing part was listening to these Democrats pretend that the standards haven’t been lowered for women. That is a known f*cking fact. But they want to pretend like women are meeting those same standards. Proving once again that to be a Democrat you have to be severely f*cking retarded and living in FantasyF*ckingLand.. See, e.g., SloF*ckingPinhead.
This post was edited on 1/16/25 at 9:29 am
Posted on 1/16/25 at 8:40 am to DeafVallyBatnR
If they can fit all the physical requirements, they can, but they don't have the temperament or aggression. The problem is women were not made to be warriors. They are not war dogs. It is an inherent psychological makeup that most women don't have. God made us different for a reason. It will always try to fit a square peg in a round hole. It is forced and defies the set purposes of our creator. It just checks off some boxes for the virtue signalers.
Posted on 1/16/25 at 8:40 am to Gaspergou202
If you consider the average male vs the average female, I kind of think it is obvious that the male is going to have a physical advantage. In combat is a broad term. Needs to be better defined. If piloting and aircraft or being a member of a naval vessel in combat well female with the same skill or better is a good choice. If we are talking about hand to hand fox hole shite not so much in favor of a women against a man.
Posted on 1/16/25 at 8:41 am to Lutcher Lad
Any woman who meets the same physical requirements as a man can be in combat. That is my stance.
Based on the fact that less than 1% of women can meet that requirement and men are more likely to enlist, you'll probably never see more than a handful ever make it.
Based on the fact that less than 1% of women can meet that requirement and men are more likely to enlist, you'll probably never see more than a handful ever make it.
Posted on 1/16/25 at 8:41 am to Lutcher Lad
I work in a selection only military unit right now and there are some women that could do it.
The military needs to set the same standard for men and women. Everyone above the line is good to go, below the line isn't. No exceptions.
A combat force would still be 98% men, but lets not pretend that there aren't some worthless males in the ranks as well.
The military needs to set the same standard for men and women. Everyone above the line is good to go, below the line isn't. No exceptions.
A combat force would still be 98% men, but lets not pretend that there aren't some worthless males in the ranks as well.
Posted on 1/16/25 at 8:41 am to Lutcher Lad
quote:Define combat.
Women in Combat: What say you?
E.g., Is operating a joystick and confirming kills on a video screen "combat"?
Posted on 1/16/25 at 8:41 am to Lutcher Lad
My wife served. She was a Russian translator. She's proficient with firearms. However, the only way she's shooting another human is if they are hurting our dog. I don't want her having my six. So...negative on in combat.
Posted on 1/16/25 at 8:42 am to Lutcher Lad
I don't believe they belong in high level sports, much less combat.
Men allowing women to die for them is a curse on society.
Men allowing women to die for them is a curse on society.
This post was edited on 1/16/25 at 8:44 am
Posted on 1/16/25 at 8:42 am to Lutcher Lad
My wife (no pics) who served for quite a while agreed with the bulk of Hegseth’s statements from the podcast in November that the AP quoted.
She also brought up the point that men beyond a certain age wouldn’t be allowed to serve in some of those combat roles.
It should be about preparedness, plain and simple.
ETA: She agreed with having the same standards across the board and that having women in combat does make it more complicated. She doesn’t have an issue with the physical standards being the same and acknowledged the complications.
quote:
“I’m straight up just saying we should not have women in combat roles. It hasn’t made us more effective. Hasn’t made us more lethal. Has made fighting more complicated,” he said in a podcast hosted by Shawn Ryan on Nov. 7. Women have a place in the military, he said, just not in special operations, artillery, infantry and armor units.
She also brought up the point that men beyond a certain age wouldn’t be allowed to serve in some of those combat roles.
It should be about preparedness, plain and simple.
ETA: She agreed with having the same standards across the board and that having women in combat does make it more complicated. She doesn’t have an issue with the physical standards being the same and acknowledged the complications.
This post was edited on 1/16/25 at 8:45 am
Posted on 1/16/25 at 8:44 am to Lutcher Lad
When I hear this argument /
Let’s have a female running back in the NFL play an entire season and see how she is doing at the end of the season - if she hasn’t quit or been killed then perhaps woman can be in physical and tough environments
Let’s have a female running back in the NFL play an entire season and see how she is doing at the end of the season - if she hasn’t quit or been killed then perhaps woman can be in physical and tough environments
Posted on 1/16/25 at 8:46 am to papasmurf1269
Put 1 in full battle rattle for a day. Idk any I served with that wouldn't tap out.
Posted on 1/16/25 at 8:52 am to Lutcher Lad
No….women do not belong in combat. A vast majority of them would represent the weakest link in the chain and could ultimately pose a threat to the safety and security of an outfit primarily made up of men.
Posted on 1/16/25 at 8:57 am to Lutcher Lad
I think many women that are complaining about this are more interested in the ability to be in combat more so than they want to be in combat. Combat is hell. If you WANT to be in combat, you don't understand combat.
This post was edited on 1/16/25 at 8:59 am
Posted on 1/16/25 at 8:58 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
Define combat.
I'd define it as boots on the ground carrying a weapon.
Posted on 1/16/25 at 8:58 am to FLTech
quote:
Let’s have a female running back in the NFL play an entire season and see how she is doing at the end of the season - if she hasn’t quit or been killed then perhaps woman can be in physical and tough environments
That's a fair statement. The standards for women has been severely lowered as compared to men. Read Pete's book, "The War on Warriors" and you'll see what's real in our military today under the Biden error.
Posted on 1/16/25 at 8:59 am to Lutcher Lad
11B MOS here. One year in an infantry battalion in 1969 in Vietnam. I find the idea of women in a combat environment and doing what I did and what I saw done ludicrous.
Posted on 1/16/25 at 9:00 am to Lutcher Lad
quote:
The veterans and the active military members are the ones who give the best prospective, not the fake, phony politicians.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 1/16/25 at 9:01 am to Lutcher Lad
As long as they meet the male standards without lowering the standards, let them fight. The only real issue I see is the fear of them being captured then raped.
Posted on 1/16/25 at 9:05 am to Scruffy
quote:.
If they can meet the exact same standards as their male counterparts and the standards aren’t lowered to allow for this.
That is the only way I would even consider it.
All that is great but the enemy still uses the rape of female soldiers as psychological warfare, especially if they are eventually released from captivity pregnant. Men are more capable of unemotionally doing their job if they are not worrying about their female counterparts being captured and violated.
This post was edited on 1/16/25 at 10:38 am
Popular
Back to top



1








