- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: With 47 threatening to destroy irans energy infrastructure. Is that a war crime?
Posted on 3/30/26 at 5:58 pm to dafif
Posted on 3/30/26 at 5:58 pm to dafif
quote:
Next question - how much can we do to bring a swift end to their war crimes and would eliminating their power be an acceptable part if civilians are also without power?
Seems the answer would be yes
Perhaps you can expand on your thinking of how hurting the civilians of Iran (that their regime doesn't care about) helps is achieve these goals.
Specifically the water desalination plants.
1
Posted on 3/30/26 at 6:00 pm to sidewalkside
quote:
Yall MAGA tards knee jerk react to everything.
quote:
I’m not trying to level some moral equivalency
No, you're just attempting to ask for civil discourse right after offering insult to those whom you would see respond.
Let us see how that works out.
Posted on 3/30/26 at 6:06 pm to Nosevens
Correct. The real war crime is the bombing that killed school children.
Posted on 3/30/26 at 6:06 pm to Centinel
quote:
Here, let me break down international law for everyone: Did the United States do it? Illegal, War Crime, against International Law, etc. etc. which can only be remedied by massive transfers of wealth from the US to the "international community" Did any other country do it? Totes cool. Carry on.
Let’s be even more specific. Did a democrat president do it; legal
Did a republican president do it; illegal
Posted on 3/30/26 at 6:07 pm to sidewalkside
The only way we would ever be punished is if we consented to being punished.
Maybe if some cuck were in power that allowed it, it could happen.
Maybe if some cuck were in power that allowed it, it could happen.
Posted on 3/30/26 at 6:22 pm to Powerman
quote:
Destroying critical civilian infrastructure is still a war crime.
Posted on 3/30/26 at 6:26 pm to sidewalkside
quote:
Isn’t it a war crime if civilian targets are intentionally targeted
No it clearly states "civilian property" cannot be targeted. A civilian is a person whose primary occupation is civil or nonmilitary
I've not yet encountered one single civilian who owned an "energy infrastructure". In fact all "energy infrastructure" in Iran is owned by the government
quote:
The electric power industry in Iran has become self-sufficient in producing the required equipment to build power plants. Most of the electricity generators are run by the government
Posted on 3/30/26 at 6:36 pm to sidewalkside
It’s not a military target, so I believe it technically is.
Posted on 3/30/26 at 6:54 pm to nealnan8
Yep intentionally did it right? So your arse does pucker too much, unless purposefully it’s just a horror of war, unlike those 40,000 civilians Iranians massacred the month before
Posted on 3/30/26 at 6:55 pm to sidewalkside
quote:
Isn’t it a war crime if civilian targets are intentionally targeted to inflict harm on the general population?
No, war crimes assume international law, and there is no such thing as international law.
Posted on 3/30/26 at 7:21 pm to Bunk Moreland
Apparently did not read above - Iran is not part of the ICC - does not apply to them
Posted on 3/30/26 at 7:23 pm to sidewalkside
quote:
Isn’t it a war crime if civilian targets are intentionally targeted to inflict harm on the general population?
Literally in the Geneva Convention. It's a war crime to destroy and attack civilian infrastructure.
So much so, a Catholic Bishop affirms this. These types of attacks are not Christian. They are not humane. They are not what the West and the US are built upon.
This post was edited on 3/30/26 at 7:24 pm
Posted on 3/30/26 at 7:24 pm to Powerman
quote:
Perhaps you can expand on your thinking of how hurting the civilians of Iran (that their regime doesn't care about) helps is achieve these goals.
I think you intentionally left out that the ICC does not apply as I quoted but, IRGC use the water supply and electricity to commit terror so the justification is tjere if it swiftly ends this conflict
If the assessment is months of no water or electricity that is another dynamic
Posted on 3/30/26 at 7:26 pm to dafif
quote:
IRGC use the water supply and electricity to commit terror so the justification is tjere if it swiftly ends this conflict
Of course they do..and so does 94M civilians in Persia.
Starving innocent people out of water and food and power and shelter is one of the most sinful and demonic acts I can conjure.... Or exactly what Israel and the IDF have done to Gaza.
Posted on 3/30/26 at 7:27 pm to Jack Ruby
quote:
Literally in the Geneva Convention. I
Iran is a signatory to the Geneva convention so all of their crimes might apply however they are not a signatory to the ICC so they cannot be held accountable and the ICC cannot get involved with non signatories
Posted on 3/30/26 at 7:30 pm to DeBoar
quote:
Who exactly are the war police?
People that want open borders. I hope our military does not leave until every raghead is dead. If not they will be back in business as soon as our military leaves. Israel will not stop until there are no more missiles and drones are destroyed
Posted on 3/30/26 at 7:33 pm to Jack Ruby
quote:
So much so, a Catholic Bishop affirms this
Actually using the Catholic Church undermines your argument. Your popes are an embarrassment including WWII
Page 5 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News