re: With 20 days to 2 months, Greenland will be ours!! It is 1.25 times bigger than Alaska!!

quote:

---

All irrelevant atm.

---

You assert a “pre-Trump" pivot to China and now you've declared the entire evidentiary domain “irrelevant” because it contradicts the conclusion you've already decided on. Come on, bro.

quote:

---

You trust Europe due to historical ties. I say that those ties don’t mean shite to European leadership.

---

Only one of us has provided concrete examples for our claim. I've provided multiple and I'm willing to provide a dozen more.

Still waiting on your first one.

quote:

---

You assert a “pre-Trump" pivot to China and now you've declared the entire evidentiary domain “irrelevant” because it contradicts the conclusion you've already decided on.

---

I mean, they were all about China pre-Trump. How is that remotely debatable. He forced them to decide where their “loyalty” is (for now).

quote:

---

Only one of us has provided concrete examples for our claim. I've provided multiple and I'm willing to provide a dozen more.

---

Historical ones - irrelevant at this moment.

Otherwise, you have simply noted that they have chosen the only legitimate option available to them. If the USSC declares tariffs to be outside of Trump’s ability to implement, then I predict that Europe will mess us over.

quote:

---

bet they’d take that deal

---

You’ve asserted a pre-Trump pivot to China, refused to provide a single concrete security decision that demonstrates it, and then declared decades of counter-examples “irrelevant” because they contradict your conclusion. I've also offered several times to provide many, more recent, pre-Trump examples that took place during the Obama and Biden admins as well.

Once you ruled out evidence, by definition, your claim became unfalsifiable and there's nothing to debate. At this point we’re no longer arguing about geopolitics or alliances. We’re arguing about your personal distrust. I agree. You distrust them.

I’m happy to reengage if you can point to a specific instance where the EU sided with China against U.S. security interests. If not, there’s nothing left to debate here, and I’m not interested in shadow boxing.

quote:

---

no we won't

---

Do you know how to read a map?

Denmark does control Greenland as part of the Kingdom of Denmark. They manage their defense and foreign affairs. Greenland handles most of their domestic issues. Greenland has kind of a pseudo independence through a referendum.

quote:

---

i deal in reality

---

define “woman.”

Grok’s .02$

As of January 2026, the Trump administration is discussing options for Greenland, including a potential Compact of Free Association as one pathway—providing US defense/security guarantees, funding, and military access in exchange for strategic control—primarily if Greenland gains independence from Denmark. This is floated alongside purchase or other means, driven by Arctic security priorities against Russia/China, but no agreement exists yet.

we dont need a corrupt monarchy in denmark or those 40,000 malnourished greenlanders deciding whether or not China can set up shop there.

Its that simple.

Greenland - What is China doing there and WHY?

amazing people who dont bother to look at the history think denmark is just some super nice country of peace-loving bicycle riders who only want greenland to be happy.