- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Witches and demons are real... here is one
Posted on 11/13/23 at 3:09 pm to Mo Jeaux
Posted on 11/13/23 at 3:09 pm to Mo Jeaux
quote:
That's what the discussion has been about for the past few posts. It was mentioned, but later edited.
So all the books of the Old Testament were edited to take out any mention of human sacrifice to Yahweh? Occam’s Razor
Posted on 11/13/23 at 3:23 pm to Revelator
I didn't say that, but yes, I'm sure all the books have been edited in one way or another.
Posted on 11/13/23 at 3:26 pm to Champagne
quote:
This is not a political thread. This threat belongs on the OT. Any and all topics concerning Religion do not belong on the Political Talk.
The woman is claiming that abortion is used in witchcraft ceremonies. Abortion is certainly a political subject. And since witchcraft is part of this particular story, the spiritual realm becomes part of the discussion.
This post was edited on 11/13/23 at 3:28 pm
Posted on 11/13/23 at 3:28 pm to Mo Jeaux
quote:
I didn't say that, but yes, I'm sure all the books have been edited in one way or another.
Correcting punctuation or spelling can be a form of editing, but it doesn’t mean any truths were altered.
This post was edited on 11/13/23 at 3:31 pm
Posted on 11/13/23 at 3:35 pm to burger bearcat
That gal is not much of a witch and I doubt she has any power other than the Facebook version of any narcissistic huckster, IMO. She's play acting and if real Satanic power were to ever manifest to her, she'd freak, scream and probably pass out. Albeit, if she keeps mocking and disrespectfully playing around with the idea or the real lives of innocents, Satan will be there to collect her soul in due time. Sad that she'll affect the lives of many naive and purposeless young women.
She should watch the James Woodford after-death Video, to get a real dose of Satan and how such would affect even the most hardened of psychologically disciplined warriors who think they can cut it without Jesus' help. Whatever, it's her baby to rock...or kill. Live and learn.
She should watch the James Woodford after-death Video, to get a real dose of Satan and how such would affect even the most hardened of psychologically disciplined warriors who think they can cut it without Jesus' help. Whatever, it's her baby to rock...or kill. Live and learn.
Posted on 11/13/23 at 3:38 pm to Revelator
quote:
Correcting punctuation or spelling can be a form of editing,
Yes, it can.
quote:
it doesn’t mean any truths were altered.
Oh, I'm sure quite a few "truths" were altered at one time or another.
Posted on 11/13/23 at 3:39 pm to RCDfan1950
quote:
the James Woodford after-death Video
The dead for 11 hours guy?
Posted on 11/13/23 at 3:41 pm to Revelator
quote:
Correcting punctuation or spelling can be a form of editing, but it doesn’t mean any truths were altered.
Not only that, but the Bible is one of the most vetted and reliable ancient texts we have. By far, actually, with very few texts that can come close.
I'm sure stuff was changed (though not nearly as much as most texts of that age). I'm also sure that if it is possible for God to inspire the original writings in the first place, it's also just as possible for God to inspire the edits.
Posted on 11/13/23 at 3:45 pm to Revelator
quote:
The woman is claiming that abortion is used in witchcraft ceremonies. Abortion is certainly a political subject. And since witchcraft is part of this particular story, the spiritual realm becomes part of the discussion.
That's quite a stretch.
Posted on 11/13/23 at 3:50 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
the Bible is one of the most vetted and reliable ancient texts we have.
quote:
I'm sure stuff was changed (though not nearly as much as most texts of that age). I'm also sure that if it is possible for God to inspire the original writings in the first place, it's also just as possible for God to inspire the edits.
Posted on 11/13/23 at 4:03 pm to Champagne
quote:
That's quite a stretch.
Abortion is certainly a political subject. And I believe very strongly that spiritual forces are behind abortions. It’s hard to discuss abortion without including the moral perspective.
Posted on 11/13/23 at 4:20 pm to Mo Jeaux
quote:Well, over the course of 1000 years, they managed to change a polytheist religion to a fierce monotheism, and then 2000 years ago managed to convert IT into a softly-monotheistic, "Trinitarian" religion.
Oh, I'm sure quite a few "truths" were altered at one time or another.
This post was edited on 11/13/23 at 4:30 pm
Posted on 11/13/23 at 4:27 pm to Revelator
quote:
in none of those passages is it ever recorded that a priest offered up a human to the Lord.
The second temple priests/scribes re-wrote their scriptures and their history, and they opposed child sacrifice, so they wrote about it in such a way to demonize it. They also repeated it a bunch of times that Israelites needed to stop sacrificing their children. Logic dictates since their leaders were telling them to stop killing their kids, that they were killing their kids.
quote:
2Ahaz was twenty years old when he began to reign, and he reigned sixteen years in Jerusalem. And he did not do what was right in the eyes of the LORD his God, as his father David had done, 3but he walked in the way of the kings of Israel. He even burned his son as an offering, according to the despicable practices of the nations whom the LORD drove out before the people of Israel.
So you’re right. You won’t find a priest sacrificing a child in the Bible. You’ll find however Yahweh commanding it a bunch of times, Judges like Jepthah sacrificing children, and David, Ahaz, Manasseh, and other kings sacrificing children. All of Judah was sacrificing their firstborn in 2 Kings 17:17. Despite it not being practiced by second temple priests, child sacrifice was a rampant practice pre-exile according to the Bible.
quote:
Do you think if Yahweh demanded human sacrifices that it wouldn’t be mentioned at least once in the Old or New Testament?
A perfect example of willful ignorance or trolling. All of Israel and Judah is sacrificing their firstborn children as prescribed in exodus which you ignore, and Ezekiel writing that Yahweh admitted that he demanded firstborn sacrifices as punishment, and Yahweh accepted the sacrifice of Saul’s sons and Jepthah’s daughter, and you ignore it all. And you have “god” himself sacrificing his “only son”.
I don’t think you have the courage or the character to answer this question. I hope you prove me wrong.
Did you read about how Babylonian Jews’ literature includes Isaac really being sacrificed? In light of post exilic second temple Jewish writings like Jeremiah and Ezekiel condemning child sacrifice, do you think it is more likely that a post exilic scribe edited Genesis to remove the sacrifice, or do you think it is more likely that the Babylonian Jewish scribes and rabbis invented the part of Isaac really being sacrificed?
If we only had a copy of Genesis from Elephantine, Egypt from the Jews that fled there in the 700’s BCE and stayed there until about 400 BCE, we’d have proof. Do you know anything about this sect that worshipped Yahweh and his wife Anat? We have records of them corresponding with the second temple in Jerusalem in about 411 BCE asking for funding for the rebuilding of their temple in Elephantine. They had no knowledge of Deuteronomic law - that there can be only one temple (in Jerusalem only). The elephantine Jews had never heard of Moses, or Joshua, and didn’t have any copies of the Torah. That’s because the Torah was written and compiled way after the elephantine Jews fled to Egypt… the Torah was written in the second temple period post-exile.
So who is right and who is a liar? Did tbe post exilic through Middle Ages Babylonian Jews and rabbis make up the actual sacrifice and ashes of Isaac for 2000 years? Or was that the original, and the later scribes in Jerusalem edited Genesis to substitute the ram for Isaac?
Posted on 11/13/23 at 4:35 pm to Revelator
quote:Good Lord, the OLDEST extant text we have found to date as written 500 YEARS after the Judean elite returned from the Exile with a VASTLY altered religion and started working to impose that "new and improved" religion upon the Judeans who had remained behind in the Levant ("the People of the Land").
Do you think if Yahweh demanded human sacrifices that it wouldn’t be mentioned at least once in the Old or New Testament?
Posted on 11/13/23 at 4:35 pm to Antoninus
quote:
You will NEVER get a Biblical Literalist to admit that scriveners have been revising the substance of the Biblical stories for more than 3,000 years.
Not just that, but they can make a claim, and instead of showing them their folly based on science or actual history, you show them in their own book where it contradicts their belief. Their brain crashes to a blue screen of death due to a logical error.
Posted on 11/13/23 at 4:39 pm to Antoninus
quote:
those who just memorize (often poorly-translated) verses
The only person in this thread who does that is on your side.
The believers pointed out where said person was wrong.
Posted on 11/13/23 at 5:55 pm to Antoninus
quote:
returned from the Exile with a VASTLY altered religion
They did not teach us in catechism that Cyrus the Great, the Babylonian King and emperor of Persia, funded the rebuilding of the temple in Jersusalem. You’d think that in order for the Jews to secure that funding that there would be a few strings attached.
It’s funny that most of the Old Testament demonizes the gods of the other lands. Yahweh is going to judge and smite the hell out of the Egyptian gods, Baal Zebul, Baal Hadad, Marduk, Chemosh, Milcom, etc. However, it is completely silent on the subject of the LORD’s anointed messiah (Isaiah 45:1) Cyrus the Great and his god Ahura Mazda.
quote:
Judeans who had remained behind in the Levant
It’s strange. Catechism taught that “the Jews” were exiled to Babylon. I just assumed by “the Jews” they meant all the Jews. Wait a minute, just the elite, royalty, educated, and scribes were brought to Babylon and the rest stayed there to work the land??? Holy crap my brain exploded.
That’s how we ended up with Moses and with Abraham. Both the returning exiles and the “people of the land” had fictive histories that legitimized their claim to the land. Slavery in Egypt and Moses and the exodus was invented but it paralleled the exiles’ own experience as slaves in Babylon and leaving there with their freedom to claim the promise land.
This post was edited on 11/13/23 at 5:59 pm
Posted on 11/13/23 at 9:29 pm to Squirrelmeister
quote:
Wait a minute, just the elite, royalty, educated, and scribes were brought to Babylon and the rest stayed there to work the land??? Holy crap my brain exploded.
Almost as if the captain of the guard left some of the poor of the land as vinedressers and farmers, or something.
Posted on 11/13/23 at 10:50 pm to Bestbank Tiger
I just wanted to make a joke about tying the bitch up and throwing her in a lake like the puritans if she escapes she’s a witch if she doesn’t oops our bad. But with hanktonius and squirrel dominating this thread it’s like listening to two assholes at a party that love to hear themselves talk and just as I do when faced with this in real life I’m gonna walk away and let you two verbally jerk off.
Posted on 11/14/23 at 7:36 am to burger bearcat
quote:
in exchange for dark powers/magic.
Not sure who is crazier. Her for thinking her emo witch shite is granting her dark magic powers, or you for fricking believing her.
Popular
Back to top


1


