- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Witches and demons are real... here is one
Posted on 11/13/23 at 11:24 am to Squirrelmeister
Posted on 11/13/23 at 11:24 am to Squirrelmeister
quote:
Look at Genesis 6. Psalm 82. Deut 32. Many many times the sons of God “bene Elohim” are mentioned. “God” had many sons. The English translation of the Greek “monogenes” as “only son” is such a bad translation. It means one of a kind, or unique. It doesn’t literally mean the only one that exists. Why do christians deny these other sons or God?
Sons of God can be translated as angels like the phrase is used in Genesis 6:2
That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose.
quote:
Maybe it’s like when Abraham is about to sacrifice his “only son” Isaac. Wait a second, didn’t I just read about a son named Ishmael that came about through the rape of his wife’s slave Hagar?
Isaac was considered the first born to God, he was the son of the promise and the one God promised to Abraham.
Because Abraham was disobedient, didn’t wait on God, and listened to his wife Sarah, he did sleep with his concubine and she bore him Ishmael. As far as Abraham offering up Isaac, God would have never allowed him to do it, and didn’t. Abraham and Isaac is another illustration of Yaweh and Jesus.
This post was edited on 11/13/23 at 11:34 am
Posted on 11/13/23 at 11:30 am to burger bearcat
Burn her at the stake!!
Posted on 11/13/23 at 12:10 pm to Squirrelmeister
Lol, aren't you the idiot that was quoting the NIV claiming the Lord supports abortion?
Why don't you try studying the Bible instead of looking for partial quotes...
Why don't you try studying the Bible instead of looking for partial quotes...
Posted on 11/13/23 at 12:12 pm to oogabooga68
quote:
She is unwittingly doing work for Satan.
If she claims she is a witch, she isn't unwittingly doing work for Satan, she actually thinks she is doing work for Satan...
Posted on 11/13/23 at 12:12 pm to Revelator
You ignored most of my points but thank you for answering my last two questions.
Says who? The ancient Hebrews had a name for messenger - “Malach”. Like the name “Malachi” means “my angel”. The word used in Genesis 6:2 is “bene” which is “sons”.
Hundreds of years later, the newly monotheistic Jews speaking Greek weren’t comfortable with many sons of god, so they changes a bunch of “sons of god” into “angels of god” in the Septuagint.
Regardless, if you consider those divine beings who came down from heaven to have sex with the mortal women, as being created by God, would they not be his “sons”?
Sounds a little rapey. Sounds like the choice was all on the end of the sons of God, and not so much on the fair maidens. I wonder how much consent they really did give, if any.
I disagree. I think god considered Ishmael to be a legitimate son, as was the ancient custom. Could you share a biblical passage that supports your claim that God considered Isaac to be the firstborn?
That is because you are reading an edited and redacted story. The original likely was that Isaac was killed and reduced to ashes.
Ashes of brother Isaac
Gen 22:
If you read that passage, it reads as if Abraham did sacrifice Isaac. Then when he returns to Beersheba, there’s no mention of Isaac returning with him. In the preceding paragraph, YHWH is the one who stops Abraham… but it was Elohim throughout the story and it was Elohim who commanded the sacrifice. Funny there is no other Elohim-based stories with Isaac in it past that point. The one random YHWH was an obvious edit, because post-exilic scribes didn’t like the child sacrifice. Jews who stayed in Babylon never got the memo of the ram substitution and continued to believe Isaac was actually sacrificed.
quote:
Sons of God can be translated as angels like the phrase is used in Genesis 6:2
Says who? The ancient Hebrews had a name for messenger - “Malach”. Like the name “Malachi” means “my angel”. The word used in Genesis 6:2 is “bene” which is “sons”.
Hundreds of years later, the newly monotheistic Jews speaking Greek weren’t comfortable with many sons of god, so they changes a bunch of “sons of god” into “angels of god” in the Septuagint.
Regardless, if you consider those divine beings who came down from heaven to have sex with the mortal women, as being created by God, would they not be his “sons”?
quote:
That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose.
Sounds a little rapey. Sounds like the choice was all on the end of the sons of God, and not so much on the fair maidens. I wonder how much consent they really did give, if any.
quote:
Isaac was considered the first born to God
I disagree. I think god considered Ishmael to be a legitimate son, as was the ancient custom. Could you share a biblical passage that supports your claim that God considered Isaac to be the firstborn?
quote:
As far as Abraham offering up Isaac, God would have never allowed him to do it, and didn’t.
That is because you are reading an edited and redacted story. The original likely was that Isaac was killed and reduced to ashes.
Ashes of brother Isaac
Gen 22:
quote:
15And the angel of the LORD called to Abraham a second time from heaven 16and said, “By myself I have sworn, declares the LORD, because you have done this and have not withheld your son, your only son, 17I will surely bless you, and I will surely multiply your offspring as the stars of heaven and as the sand that is on the seashore. And your offspring shall possess the gate of his enemies, 18and in your offspring shall all the nations of the earth be blessed, because you have obeyed my voice.” 19So Abraham returned to his young men, and they arose and went together to Beersheba. And Abraham lived at Beersheba.
If you read that passage, it reads as if Abraham did sacrifice Isaac. Then when he returns to Beersheba, there’s no mention of Isaac returning with him. In the preceding paragraph, YHWH is the one who stops Abraham… but it was Elohim throughout the story and it was Elohim who commanded the sacrifice. Funny there is no other Elohim-based stories with Isaac in it past that point. The one random YHWH was an obvious edit, because post-exilic scribes didn’t like the child sacrifice. Jews who stayed in Babylon never got the memo of the ram substitution and continued to believe Isaac was actually sacrificed.
Posted on 11/13/23 at 12:47 pm to The Maj
quote:
claiming the Lord supports abortion?
I wouldn’t claim anything about the LORD actually supporting anything, because I don’t believe the LORD exists. He exists in the same sense as the tooth fairy and Easter bunny, which is to say, he doesn’t exist in reality, but only in fantasy.
quote:
quoting the NIV
Nearly all my quotes are of the ESV. A few from the KJV. Those are the only two I quote. Personally I don’t believe the NIV is very accurate or consistent with the original manuscripts and scrolls.
quote:
aren't you the idiot
Look in the mirror and you’ll find him.
Posted on 11/13/23 at 12:48 pm to Snipe
"Never suffer a witch to live" ~Exodus 22:18
Posted on 11/13/23 at 1:10 pm to Squirrelmeister
quote:
because I don’t believe the LORD exists
Explains about all anyone needs to know about you then...
You will confess one day, hopefully not before it is too late...
Posted on 11/13/23 at 1:56 pm to Squirrelmeister
quote:In my experience, there is usually an inverse relationship between (a) the extent to which a person declares his "belief" in the Bible and (b) his understanding of the HISTORY of the Bible.
Your beliefs won’t let you comprehend what I’m about to type, but here goes anyway. The Bible was written by multiple scribes.
Posted on 11/13/23 at 1:59 pm to Revelator
quote:"'Only son' does not mean 'only son.' It means 'legitimate son.'"quote:Isaac was considered the first born to God, he was the son of the promise and the one God promised to Abraham.
Maybe it’s like when Abraham is about to sacrifice his “only son” Isaac. Wait a second, didn’t I just read about a son named Ishmael that came about through the rape of his wife’s slave Hagar?
Because Abraham was disobedient, didn’t wait on God, and listened to his wife Sarah, he did sleep with his concubine and she bore him Ishmael. As far as Abraham offering up Isaac, God would have never allowed him to do it, and didn’t. Abraham and Isaac is another illustration of Yaweh and Jesus.
Posted on 11/13/23 at 2:01 pm to Antoninus
quote:
declares his "belief" in the Bible and (b) his understanding of the HISTORY of the Bible.
Now let's see.....
So far you have told black folk you know more than they do about being black.
You told a gay poster you knew more about being gay than he did.
You claim to know more about the koran than millions of muslims...
And NOW you are going to lecture Christians about the Bible.
Is their anything you DON'T know?
Posted on 11/13/23 at 2:01 pm to burger bearcat
This is not a political thread. This threat belongs on the OT.
Any and all topics concerning Religion do not belong on the Political Talk.
Any and all topics concerning Religion do not belong on the Political Talk.
Posted on 11/13/23 at 2:05 pm to The Maj
quote:
Why don't you try studying the Bible instead of looking for partial quotes...
Why don't you tell us how he's wrong?
Posted on 11/13/23 at 2:17 pm to The Maj
quote:
You will confess one day, hopefully not before it is too late...
Or else Jesus, who was supposed to “return” 1900++ years ago according to Paul and the gospel writers who thought they would still be alive when Jesus “returns”, will kill me by squishing my blood out in his giant wine press. I’ll be honest with you - I’m not afraid of your fantasies.
Posted on 11/13/23 at 2:24 pm to Mo Jeaux
quote:In my view, those who look to the Bible with a healthy dose of intellectual skepticism tend to UNDERSTAND it far better than those who just memorize (often poorly-translated) verses and dedicate themselves to seeking reconciliation of inherently-contradictory passages.quote:Why don't you tell us how he's wrong?
Why don't you try studying the Bible instead of looking for partial quotes...
Posted on 11/13/23 at 2:35 pm to Squirrelmeister
quote:
If you read that passage, it reads as if Abraham did sacrifice Isaac. Then when he returns to Beersheba, there’s no mention of Isaac returning with him. In the preceding paragraph, YHWH is the one who stops Abraham…
Read the passage
Genesis 22:10
Then Abraham reached out his hand and took the knife to slaughter his son.
11 But the angel of the LORD called to him from heaven and said, “Abraham, Abraham!” And he said, “Here I am.”
12 He said, “Do not lay your hand on the boy or do anything to him, for now I know that you fear God, seeing you have not withheld your son, your only son, from me.
Posted on 11/13/23 at 2:50 pm to Revelator
quote:
Read the passage
That’s what I was saying. Remember this?
quote:
In the preceding paragraph, YHWH is the one who stops Abraham
The part you bolded is precisely the part I was referring to. Imagine, just imagine how it would read with that sentence removed…
Then Abraham reached out his hand and took the knife to slaughter his son. 11 And the angel of the LORD called to him from heaven and said, “Abraham, Abraham!” And he said, “Here I am.” 12 He said, “for now I know that you fear God, seeing you have not withheld your son, your only son, from me.
Did you read about how Babylonian Jews’ literature includes Isaac really being sacrificed? In light of post exilic second temple Jewish writings like Jeremiah and Ezekiel condemning child sacrifice, do you think it is more likely that a post exilic scribe edited Genesis to remove the sacrifice, or do you think it is more likely that the Babylonian Jewish scribes and rabbis invented the part of Isaac really being sacrificed?
Posted on 11/13/23 at 2:55 pm to Squirrelmeister
quote:
The part you bolded is precisely the part I was referring to. Imagine, just imagine how it would read with that sentence removed…
We can imagine anything if we want to go down that road.
The Bible says to cast down vain imaginations. That’s good advice.
quote:
Did you read about how Babylonian Jews’ literature includes Isaac really being sacrificed? In light of post exilic second temple Jewish writings like Jeremiah and Ezekiel condemning child sacrifice, do you think it is more likely that a post exilic scribe edited Genesis to remove the sacrifice, or do you think it is more likely that the Babylonian Jewish scribes and rabbis invented the part of Isaac really being sacrificed?
The Old Testament is replete of examples of priest offering all types of sacrifices to Yahweh. Sheep, goats, doves, calves, grain offerings, drink offerings, etc.
in none of those passages is it ever recorded that a priest offered up a human to the Lord. Do you think if Yahweh demanded human sacrifices that it wouldn’t be mentioned at least once in the Old or New Testament?
How about focusing on what’s actually written and stop trying to imagine what’s not.
This post was edited on 11/13/23 at 3:07 pm
Posted on 11/13/23 at 2:57 pm to Squirrelmeister
quote:You will NEVER get a Biblical Literalist to admit that scriveners have been revising the substance of the Biblical stories for more than 3,000 years.
do you think it is more likely that a post exilic scribe edited Genesis to remove the sacrifice, or do you think it is more likely that the Babylonian Jewish scribes and rabbis invented the part of Isaac really being sacrificed?
They are equally-convinced that "if it is right to call him a man" and such were included in Josephus' original text.
This post was edited on 11/13/23 at 2:59 pm
Posted on 11/13/23 at 3:05 pm to Revelator
quote:
Do you think of Yahweh demanded human sacrifices that it would be mentioned at least once in the Old or New Testament?
That's what the discussion has been about for the past few posts. It was mentioned, but later edited.
Popular
Back to top


2




