- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Wisconsin judge says she can't be charged
Posted on 5/14/25 at 4:16 pm to This GUN for HIRE
Posted on 5/14/25 at 4:16 pm to This GUN for HIRE
The thing is, her making this argument should get her in very hot water in terms of ethics, because she's admitting she directed a Defendant outside of her courtroom ex parte without permitting opposing counsel to be part of that conversation. So in arguing it was "official duties" she can't claim it was some mistake or non-intentional, which means I can't see how this isn't an admission of unethical behavior.
The other major issue is that if she had immunity, I'd argue it's only state immunity as she's a in a position for the state. These are federal charges, and they aren't bound by state immunity (similar to the reverse scenario where a President can't pardon for state crimes).
The other major issue is that if she had immunity, I'd argue it's only state immunity as she's a in a position for the state. These are federal charges, and they aren't bound by state immunity (similar to the reverse scenario where a President can't pardon for state crimes).
1
Posted on 5/14/25 at 4:23 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
her making this argument should get her in very hot water in terms of ethics
Agreed.
quote:
I'd argue it's only state immunity
I was researching this as we speak. I can't see where she has federal immunity.
She has no arguments really. She broke the law, state & federal it seems, but she has to mount some type of defense.
Posted on 5/14/25 at 4:49 pm to SallysHuman
quote:
points for trying?
Posted on 5/14/25 at 4:50 pm to bigjoe1
She might would have a case if she hadn't actually helped the dude try to escape and the people who work directly under her all back it up as fact.
Posted on 5/14/25 at 5:04 pm to bigjoe1
She grabbing at straws cause she knows she’s fricked
Posted on 5/14/25 at 5:07 pm to bigjoe1
Criminals are all the same. When they get caught they all start crying and making dumbass excuses. How’s it feel to be on the other side of the law you fat bitch!!!!!! Enjoy jail
Posted on 5/14/25 at 5:09 pm to bigjoe1
Remember when judges had to be educated and intelligent? Dems have sure destroyed that idea and practice.
Posted on 5/14/25 at 5:10 pm to bigjoe1
I hope they give her the full sentence to make an example out of her. No leniency whatsoever.
Posted on 5/14/25 at 5:30 pm to bigjoe1
quote:
Wisconsin judge says she can't be charged
lol
she better hope they give her a deal and not make an example out of her. I hope the reality has set in that she possibly fricked her life up for a criminal that shouldnt have been here in the first place..
Posted on 5/14/25 at 5:36 pm to bigjoe1
quote:
her conduct on the day in question amounted to directing people's movement in and around her courtroom
Kick her off the bench for lying.
Posted on 5/14/25 at 5:39 pm to LSUbest
Dems think the law and the Constitution is for Repubs to follow while they can do wahtever they want.
Posted on 5/14/25 at 5:44 pm to Goforit
quote:
Dems think the law and the Constitution is for Repubs to follow while they can do wahtever they want.
Yea, well the DOJ needs to arrest them representatives ASAP and charge them with everything they'd charge me for if I assaulted a federal agent.
Posted on 5/14/25 at 5:59 pm to RockyMtnTigerWDE
"I want to eat her fat pu$$y and reward her for hiding anti American criminals inside her court"- SFP
Posted on 5/14/25 at 6:12 pm to bigjoe1
quote:
They cite last year's U.S. Supreme Court ruling in President Donald Trump's 2020 election interference case that found that former presidents have absolute immunity from prosecution for official acts that fall within their “exclusive sphere of constitutional authority” and are presumptively entitled to immunity for all official acts.
So a county circuit judge is equal to the president of the United States and afforded the same level of immunity for official acts? Is that the argument they are making?
Posted on 5/14/25 at 6:13 pm to bigjoe1
Entitlement leaking down from DEM leaders.
Posted on 5/14/25 at 6:26 pm to roadGator
quote:
can argue lawyers in general aren’t scum bags if you like but I’ve seen Suits.
Not all are scum bags. Your billboard personal injury attorneys and a good bit of criminal defense attorneys are scum. I know a lot of attorneys that are good guys. Most good ones I know deal with business/corporate law and protect business from frivolous lawsuits and government regulatory bullshite.
Posted on 5/14/25 at 6:26 pm to bigjoe1
What a mindset she has. And this thing makes judgments & rulings.
Posted on 5/14/25 at 6:29 pm to This GUN for HIRE
quote:
She has no arguments really. She broke the law, state & federal it seems, but she has to mount some type of defense.
That weak arse defense will just land her a longer sentence if she tries to fight it. She would be better off doing a plea bargain for first offense and try to get off light with a few months jail and probation along with being disbarred
Posted on 5/14/25 at 6:34 pm to bigjoe1
Too bad she’s not a president or never was and never will be. That dumb cint really trying to use that? She’s fricked!
Posted on 5/14/25 at 6:37 pm to dafif
quote:
Bat signal fou he who shall not be named to approve of that argument
We need a commercial for Discount Divorce Lawyer like the ones they had for Caveman Lawyer.
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News