- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Wikipedia lists the new FBI Director as a conspiracy theorist.
Posted on 2/21/25 at 6:59 pm to 1BIGTigerFan
Posted on 2/21/25 at 6:59 pm to 1BIGTigerFan
The theory of conspiracies is one of the biggest thing the FBI does
Also accounts for a large number of their largest cases
You know. The crime of conspiracy. That the FBI had to have a theory about.
Also accounts for a large number of their largest cases
You know. The crime of conspiracy. That the FBI had to have a theory about.
This post was edited on 2/21/25 at 7:00 pm
Posted on 2/21/25 at 7:00 pm to 1BIGTigerFan
Okay. But he is the FBI Director for sure.
Posted on 2/21/25 at 7:01 pm to 1BIGTigerFan
quote:
Wikipedia
Thought it was Dickopedia now
Posted on 2/21/25 at 7:02 pm to 1BIGTigerFan
quote:
and is considered a conspiracy theorist.
Notice they don’t say who considers him a conspiracy theorist.
Posted on 2/21/25 at 7:07 pm to 1BIGTigerFan
quote:
He also claimed Democrats knew about the attack in advance. Patel promoted the conspiracy theory that Trump supporter and Oath Keeper Ray Epps was a paid undercover FBI agent who provoked rioters to enter the Capitol.
I never knew Epps was an oath keeper...might wanna tell Stu Rhodes.
Posted on 2/21/25 at 7:09 pm to 1BIGTigerFan
If he is a conspiracy theorist, what does that make the entire left wing mainstream media and politicians (Schumer, Schiff, Clinton, et al,) e.g., Russia, Russia, Russia.
Posted on 2/21/25 at 7:10 pm to 1BIGTigerFan
I stopped clicking on that site. No thanks, commies.
Posted on 2/21/25 at 7:29 pm to 1BIGTigerFan
(no message)
This post was edited on 3/3/25 at 6:40 am
Posted on 2/21/25 at 9:57 pm to bluewatersailor
I thought it was known Wikipedia is a CIA platform.
The CIA has been linked to Wikipedia editing and to the funding of Wikipedia's benefactors. Some have raised concerns that this connection may impact Wikipedia's objectivity.
Editing
In 2007, the now-defunct WikiScanner revealed that CIA computers were used to edit Wikipedia articles.
The edits included the Iraq War article in 2003 and the article on William Colby, a former CIA executive director.
A Wikipedia spokeswoman said that the changes may have violated Wikipedia's conflict-of-interest guidelines.
Funding
Foundations that have ties to the CIA and other political interests, such as the Ford Foundation and Omidyar Network, have also funded Wikipedia.
Other donors include Google, Brin Wojcicki Foundation, and others.
Concerns
Some have raised concerns that Wikipedia's funding from left-wing and politically motivated organizations may impact its objectivity.
Some say that Wikipedia may be shaping narratives in favor of progressive, globalist agendas.
Others say that proof that the CIA is editing on Wikipedia will fuel internet conspiracy theories.
The CIA has been linked to Wikipedia editing and to the funding of Wikipedia's benefactors. Some have raised concerns that this connection may impact Wikipedia's objectivity.
Editing
In 2007, the now-defunct WikiScanner revealed that CIA computers were used to edit Wikipedia articles.
The edits included the Iraq War article in 2003 and the article on William Colby, a former CIA executive director.
A Wikipedia spokeswoman said that the changes may have violated Wikipedia's conflict-of-interest guidelines.
Funding
Foundations that have ties to the CIA and other political interests, such as the Ford Foundation and Omidyar Network, have also funded Wikipedia.
Other donors include Google, Brin Wojcicki Foundation, and others.
Concerns
Some have raised concerns that Wikipedia's funding from left-wing and politically motivated organizations may impact its objectivity.
Some say that Wikipedia may be shaping narratives in favor of progressive, globalist agendas.
Others say that proof that the CIA is editing on Wikipedia will fuel internet conspiracy theories.
Posted on 2/21/25 at 10:57 pm to grape nutz
It ain't a theory if it is proven true!
Posted on 2/21/25 at 11:11 pm to 1BIGTigerFan
quote:
Wikipedia
Go take a ride around Donald Trump’s Wikipedia page and tell me what you think.
They’re always begging for money but I doubt their independence. Someone should create an independent version.
Posted on 2/21/25 at 11:13 pm to 1BIGTigerFan
Remember that whenever you go to Wikipedia and see them asking for money.
Posted on 2/21/25 at 11:46 pm to 1BIGTigerFan
Nothing wrong with being a conspiracy theorist if you’re right.
RFKj is a conspiracy theorist who knows his shite too.
RFKj is a conspiracy theorist who knows his shite too.
Posted on 2/21/25 at 11:51 pm to 1BIGTigerFan
quote:
conspiracy theorist
As the adage says, the difference between a conspiracy theory and reality is 6 months
Posted on 2/21/25 at 11:52 pm to 1BIGTigerFan
Conspiracy theorists have a much better record of late than the FBI, so I’d consider this progress for the department
Posted on 2/22/25 at 12:10 am to 1BIGTigerFan
Battle of the edits. You can join in...
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kash_Patel&action=history
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kash_Patel&action=history
Posted on 2/22/25 at 1:15 am to Padme
quote:exactly. Or in NPC terms, a conspiracy theorist.
So someone who connects the dots 6 months before it’s reported?
Posted on 2/22/25 at 5:50 am to 1BIGTigerFan
quote:
serving as the ninth director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) since 2025,
9 FBI directors since 2025? Somehow I don’t think that’s accurate
Popular
Back to top

0















