Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Wicker and Rogers demand all action by the Executive in military matters go through them

Posted on 3/20/25 at 10:24 am
Posted by BCreed1
Alabama
Member since Jan 2024
5068 posts
Posted on 3/20/25 at 10:24 am
This is some funny crap here:

quote:

The Republican chairs of the House and Senate Armed Services committees issued a joint statement Wednesday criticizing the idea of the U.S. drastically changing its military combatant command structure, saying they “will not accept” those changes without coordination with Congress and other agencies.


What this is about is NATO and troops abroad:

quote:

Chair Mike Rogers (R-Ala.) and Senate Armed Services Committee Chair Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) responded to an NBC News article published Tuesday that said the Pentagon is considering giving up its role as NATO’s supreme allied commander Europe (SACEUR) as part of restructuring of commands and headquarters.


quote:

“U.S. combatant commands are the tip of the American warfighting spear. Therefore, we are very concerned about reports that claim [the Defense Department] is considering unilateral changes on major strategic issues, including significant reductions to U.S. forces stationed abroad, absent coordination with the White House and Congress,” the two chairs said.

“We support President Trump’s efforts to ensure our allies and partners increase their contributions to strengthen our alliance structure, and we support continuing America’s leadership abroad. As such, we will not accept significant changes to our warfighting structure that are made without a rigorous interagency process, coordination with combatant commanders and the Joint Staff, and collaboration with Congress. Such moves risk undermining American deterrence around the globe and detracting from our negotiating positions with America’s adversaries,” they continued.




Problem sirs.... Problem... Congress is not over the Military.

The U.S. military, or the armed forces, falls under the executive branch of the government, with the President as the Commander-in-Chief, and the Department of Defense responsible for providing military forces.


LINK
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
70592 posts
Posted on 3/20/25 at 10:27 am to
"Muh Constitution" is doing just fine.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
76341 posts
Posted on 3/20/25 at 10:28 am to

Does anyone bother to read the Constitution anymore?

There is Article 1.

Article 2.

An article 3.


Three different lanes and the intent is that the members of each group stay in those lanes.
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
36141 posts
Posted on 3/20/25 at 10:29 am to
I’m so sick of shitty Republicans.
Posted by BCreed1
Alabama
Member since Jan 2024
5068 posts
Posted on 3/20/25 at 10:31 am to
I know it's like they all want to be in total control.

Get back to a constitutional republic at all cost.
Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
35413 posts
Posted on 3/20/25 at 10:31 am to
When is this Mississippi douche up for reelection?
Posted by BCreed1
Alabama
Member since Jan 2024
5068 posts
Posted on 3/20/25 at 10:33 am to
He will never be unseated. He really don't have to run anymore.

He will be another Mitch
Posted by coolpapaboze
Parts Unknown
Member since Dec 2006
18238 posts
Posted on 3/20/25 at 10:34 am to
I think everyone in government needs to take a mandatory civics class.
Posted by POTUS2024
Member since Nov 2022
20943 posts
Posted on 3/20/25 at 10:35 am to
Sounds a lot like a conspiracy for several things such as interference with the Executive in performing constitutional duties, and invoking the commanders is conspiracy to commit mutiny. Taken together this is a coup.

Let's see if Kash and Bondi have any balls. This is not politics, this has crossed over into criminal behavior.
Posted by tyler925
Auburn
Member since Oct 2019
1660 posts
Posted on 3/20/25 at 10:39 am to
Wicker might be one of the biggest cucks in Washington and I’m ashamed he represents Mississippi
Posted by Rip Torn
Member since Mar 2020
3355 posts
Posted on 3/20/25 at 10:42 am to
Well if it went through them nothing would ever get done because those two are useless
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
31921 posts
Posted on 3/20/25 at 10:47 am to
Judge Boasberg, line 2.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
107652 posts
Posted on 3/20/25 at 10:48 am to
Guess what boy-o? This sort of shite is COMPLETELY within Trump's authority as Commander-in-Chief.
Posted by ABearsFanNMS
Formerly of tLandmass now in Texas
Member since Oct 2014
18863 posts
Posted on 3/20/25 at 10:50 am to
quote:

I’m so sick of shitty Republicans.


Unfortunately, Wicker is Mississippi’s do nothing version of Cassidy!
Posted by UcobiaA
The Gump
Member since Nov 2010
3867 posts
Posted on 3/20/25 at 11:03 am to
I somehow doubt the DOD is doing anything unilaterally. They may be studying it to present to the president, but it seems like a move they would have him sign off on first.
Posted by dstone12
Texan
Member since Jan 2007
35230 posts
Posted on 3/20/25 at 11:05 am to
We want to weigh the whole system down.
We want studies that are timely and expensive.
We want status quo which involves leaks as multiple interagency levels.


-Wicker and Rogers.
Posted by SwampMonster
Member since Feb 2025
334 posts
Posted on 3/20/25 at 11:11 am to
Imagine that…two RINO neocon, war pigs who never served a day in combat directing others on what is militarily important.

There should be a national law that if you never served in combat arms AND never seen actual combat, you are unqualified to send anyone to war.

That would put an end to a whole bunch of this MIC crap.
Posted by CalDawg
Member since Aug 2016
1561 posts
Posted on 3/20/25 at 11:19 am to
If these 2 arseholes can’t stay in their lane, time to audit these boys & see who’s paying them.
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
34737 posts
Posted on 3/20/25 at 11:24 am to
quote:

The U.S. military, or the armed forces, falls under the executive branch of the government, with the President as the Commander-in-Chief, and the Department of Defense responsible for providing military forces.




agreed, only thing i will say is if we give up supreme command then just get out of nato.

i dont want those commie fricks in europe getting us into a war tying to send out troops to die for their BS
Posted by BCreed1
Alabama
Member since Jan 2024
5068 posts
Posted on 3/20/25 at 12:34 pm to
quote:

agreed, only thing i will say is if we give up supreme command then just get out of nato.


May be what the goal is.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram