- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why, specifically, did Obama expel over 30 Russian diplomats in December of 2016?
Posted on 7/25/25 at 10:38 pm to thebigmuffaletta
Posted on 7/25/25 at 10:38 pm to thebigmuffaletta
quote:
It’s not irrelevant, though. The entire Russia hysteria started because Hillary Clinton and her campaign fabricated the Steele dossier.
False. You need to look up a timeline.
FBI probe began prior to the election — now, when was the dossier introduced?
The question in OP was why were Russian diplomats expelled.
And this is the answer to that question:
quote:
…with references to pages in the Senate review:
Hacking:
1. Russian hack-and-leak ops (DNC comms, GRU, DCCC)
Volume V starting on page 170-221 & with additional information starting on page 815
…Hacking again:
3. Voter rolls were infiltrated and there is particularly hard evidence of this in Illinois, but at least 20 states were targeted.
Volume I, pages 10, 22, and 34
This post was edited on 7/25/25 at 10:42 pm
Posted on 7/25/25 at 11:03 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
Prior to, Russia was sold uranium. Obama was caught on a hot microphone saying he would favor Russia after his reelection. WJC got $500K to speak in Moscow. Hillary hit a literal reset button.
Prior to that……….
Posted on 7/25/25 at 11:45 pm to Zachary
Another move that supports conspiracy.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 2:30 am to Zachary
All for show and nothing else plain and simple.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 2:58 am to DeathByTossDive225
Your post is BS. The actual intelligence from the last year under Obama shows that there was never any evidence that Russia hacked or attempted to hack anything. They are not even the ones who hacked Hillarys illegal server. The illegal unsecured server in her home that was used to transmit and receive highly classified documents and emails that were destroyed while under subpoena. There was zero evidence that Trump was colluding with Russia from the intelligence they received from the fisa warrants that they obtained with a faked dossier while lying to federal judges to illegally obtain those fisa warrants.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 3:44 am to Zachary
He missed a few that were trying to spy. There is video of 2 Russian’s in the White House recording Trump with their phone talking about the Ukraine and its natural resources. In the conversation Trump said he didn’t know the Ukraine had oil.
This post was edited on 7/26/25 at 3:48 am
Posted on 7/26/25 at 7:04 am to MikkUGA
quote:
Your post is BS. The actual intelligence from the last year under Obama shows that there was never any evidence that Russia hacked or attempted to hack anything.
wut
Read the first paragraph.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 9:06 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Read the first paragraph.
You might have to highlight it for him.
The hoaxsters themselves have been passing that image around for days as if it were some sort of gotcha.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 9:24 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Read the first paragraph.
You mean the info ascertained from the asset of an asset (an asset deemed not credible until he became the source of HRC’s manufactured dossier)?
In your supposed realm, wouldn’t information gathered from a friend of a friend be considered hearsay?
I mean if I stated that an asset with the code name “death by tossed salad” told me that you liked to diddle children, and I reported the rumors to the authorities, and it was used to investigate you via clandestine surveillance, would you find the accusation, and subsequent investigation into your life to be
legitimate?
Posted on 7/26/25 at 9:27 am to Zachary
The 12/9 intelligence report pissed him off, but he was so obsessed with Trump that he kept pushing the false narrative of Trump/Russia collusion.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 9:32 am to jimmy the leg
quote:
You mean the info ascertained from the asset of an asset (an asset deemed not credible until he became the source of HRC’s manufactured dossier)?
No. That's not what the first paragraph is referencing.
That picture is from the memo Tulsi released in it's own summary of the findings within the memo.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 9:35 am to DeathByTossDive225
Muh Russia is a footnote in history without the fabricated dossier and the Clinton plan to dirty up Trump by claiming he’s a Russian asset.
Both Obama and Brennan were aware of the Clinton plan and did nor said anything about it. Had either one been forthcoming about it then the Trump Russia collusion hoax dies on the vine.
Both Obama and Brennan were aware of the Clinton plan and did nor said anything about it. Had either one been forthcoming about it then the Trump Russia collusion hoax dies on the vine.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 9:37 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
No. That's not what the first paragraph is referencing.
That picture is from the memo Tulsi released in it's own summary of the findings within the memo.
The fact he doesn’t know where that image is from tells you everything you need to know.
You can almost see them just angrily mashing the downvote button.
This post was edited on 7/26/25 at 9:41 am
Posted on 7/26/25 at 9:49 am to SlowFlowPro
A summary of the memo.
So the info is from the memo.
So the info is from the memo.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 9:51 am to DeathByTossDive225
quote:
Muh Russia is a footnote in history without the fabricated dossier and the Clinton plan to dirty up Trump by claiming he’s a Russian asset.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 10:05 am to jimmy the leg
quote:
So the info is from the memo.
From Tulsi Gabbard’s memo, yes.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 10:10 am to thebigmuffaletta
quote:
Muh Russia is a footnote in history without the fabricated dossier
quote:
The senate report makes recommendations on counter-intelligence that resulted in ongoing CI overhauls to respond to emergent threats like cyberattacks and AI.
A subsequent senate CI analysis unspecific to Russia was deemed necessary & outlines threats from adversaries like China and Iran.
And
quote:
You need to look up a timelime
The FBI was investigating before the election. The senate was on the verge of initiating their own investigation before the election. The legacy of the dossier is that the existence of tapes was discredited by by the same intelligence investigations and reviews that concluded Russia hacked the election.
This post was edited on 7/26/25 at 10:14 am
Posted on 7/26/25 at 11:10 am to DeathByTossDive225
You wouldn’t have heard Jack shite about Muh Russians without the additional narrative that Trump colluded with Russia to rig the 2016 election. The entire Muh Russia witch hunt begins and ends with the Clinton’s attempting to frame Trump and the piss dossier.
Brennan and Obama knew all along about the Clinton plan and the knew the piss dossier was fake, cooked up by the Clintons. Without this bullshite narrative inserted no one would have given a shite about Russia’s involvement in the 2016 election.
Brennan and Obama knew all along about the Clinton plan and the knew the piss dossier was fake, cooked up by the Clintons. Without this bullshite narrative inserted no one would have given a shite about Russia’s involvement in the 2016 election.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 11:13 am to jimmy the leg
quote:
A summary of the memo.
A summary IN the memo.
quote:
So the info is from the memo.
Yes, and that memo dispute this statement
quote:
The actual intelligence from the last year under Obama shows that there was never any evidence that Russia hacked or attempted to hack anything.
The memo clearly states that actual intelligence showed credible intelligence that Russia hacked something.
Popular
Back to top

1








