re: Why have Trump, Rudy, et al waited so long to publicly release their evidence?

quote:

---

Allowing a path to illegality is not evidence of that path being used for illegality.

---

Not what I asked.
If you prefer not to answer, just say so. Please don't insult your intelligence, or mine, with the obvious dodges though.

quote:

---

Do you believe that had Dane and Milwaukee Counties been forced to abide WI election law, like every other (red) county in the state, the outcome in WI would have been the same?
...
Do you believe the uneven curing of Dem vs GOP votes in PA affected vote totals?
---
You'd have to show me the evidence to judge.

---

You need me to pull the court cases for you? Come on now. That's sad.

quote:

---

Assuming you can manufacture evidence within the sphere of these questions, Why didn't Rudy rely on it in his defense?

---

(1) No need to "manufacture evidence." The Freeman admission been posted, linked, and addressed ad nauseum in threads here.
(2) I have no idea what Rudy relied upon or what evidence was denied as admissible by the judge. I have seen his characterization, and that of the media/plaintiff counsel. The two are near polar opposites

quote:

---

No such avenue exists with election issues.

---

The Compact of the States is the Constitution.

quote:

---

The Compact of the States is the Constitution.

---

But it's not. Not for this analysis.

As for the standing issue, The USSC has ruled, " yet beyond that it necessarily involves the availability of another forum where there is jurisdiction over the named parties, where the issues tendered may be litigated, and where appropriate relief may be had"

Clearly the individual states (which have domain over elections) are the jurisdiction where the issues should be litigated and appropriate relief may be had.

quote:

---

Afterall, it was the inexplicable total pause in tallying during the night which was the anomaly, not the fact a night time tally was ongoing

---

No anomaly there. That's the way it's supposed to work. If the election is close enough they will drag out the last of the absentee and military votes and count them.

quote:

---

False. 100% complete BS! After inexplicable total pauses in tallying, Biden took immediate huge jumps in vote tallies in each instance when counts resumed.

---

Yeah? No shite. The Dems leaned into absentee voting. I implied in my post that they were almost certainly cheating. It was no surprise that these ballots favored Biden.

Trump and his A-Team have had ample opportunity to prove their charges and they have spectacularly failed - in court. You can trash talk on message boards until the cows come home, but when they come home is in court where facts talk and bullshite walks.

The actual cheating was in almost impossible to prove manipulation of ACTUAL absentee voting. Trump failed because instead of doing the very laborious work of finding the "2,000 mules" interviewing them, and deposing them in court, they ejaculated charges of ballot dumps and Dominion software manipulations, all of which are fairly easy to prove if they were true...but they aren't.

quote:

---

It was a NATIONAL election!

---

And each state has the Constitutional authority to run the elections as they see fit. Any issues with an election should be litigated in that state. Texas trying to argue that is has regulatory veto over how (insert state) runs its elections is plainly unconstitutional. That is a large reason why there isn't even an avenue to permit TX to do this (hence, no standing).

quote:

---

OK, so then why discuss anything, if you can just invalidate stuff at your sole discretion?

---

This is an odd question. The same odd question could be asked of those who believe the judgement of a court is the end all be all.

quote:

---

Hes an interesting guy to debate with.

---

He doesn't "debate".

quote:

---

The last thing hell probably ever do is actually give his real opinion about what a problem is and how it can be solved.

---

That's called "trolling"

quote:

---

In the end, being a clever arguer on the internet doesnt make one actually right

---

Again, he's not nearly as "clever" as he claims to be.

He's a functioning Autistic at best.

quote:

---

The last thing hell probably ever do is actually give his real opinion about what a problem is and how it can be solved.

---

This is not true.

The problem: we have been denied access to the evidence promised.

Solution: release the evidence so we can all consume and analyze it.

quote:

---

That's called "trolling"

---

I cant really disagree