- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why have Trump, Rudy, et al waited so long to publicly release their evidence?
Posted on 12/18/23 at 12:00 pm to oogabooga68
Posted on 12/18/23 at 12:00 pm to oogabooga68
quote:
But the Courts get it wrong all the time.
Having the best system possible doesn't make it perfect.
He wasn't arguing that courts can get it wrong. His argument invalidated the system entirely.
quote:
You're just bootlicking at this point
Asking for evidence?
quote:
because it fits your narrative.
Yes, my narrative is believing in evidence and reality. I've never shied away from that.
1
Posted on 12/18/23 at 12:00 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:So your argument is that states needn’t abide with the Constitution in appointing presidential electors? That’s a novel argument.
each state has the Constitutional authority to run the elections
Posted on 12/18/23 at 12:02 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
So your argument i
This is neither mine nor an argument. I'm stating the law of the United States.
quote:
states needn’t abide with the Constitution in appointing presidential electors
I never said that.
quote:
That’s a novel argument.
And one that doesn't exist.
Posted on 12/18/23 at 12:02 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Within our system, which is based in law, it's kind of important.
Then why are you here discussing Trump? Why not let the courts decide. Why does it matter trying to persuade others on the internet?
Posted on 12/18/23 at 12:07 pm to scottydoesntknow
quote:
Then why are you here discussing Trump?
He's involved in multiple litigations that should be solved with him producing this evidence.
quote:
Why not let the courts decide.
Courts have already started to decide. Those promising all this evidence are not doing well, which is why I'm curious why they aren't using it to defend themselves.
quote:
Why does it matter trying to persuade others on the internet?
Why does what matter, specifically?
Posted on 12/18/23 at 12:09 pm to scottydoesntknow
quote:
Then why are you here discussing Trump?
The sooner you see that you're "debating" a mentally ill person who is stuck in a loop, the sooner you'll know to walk away...
Posted on 12/18/23 at 12:09 pm to oogabooga68
quote:
The sooner you see that you're "debating" a mentally ill person who is stuck in a loop,
wut?
Posted on 12/18/23 at 12:09 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Oh?
I never said that.
Well let’s see, you’re saying states have no argument that an unconstitutionality elected POTUS can negatively affect them. At least not as much as water rights.
Posted on 12/18/23 at 1:05 pm to oogabooga68
quote:
The sooner you see that you're "debating" a mentally ill person who is stuck in a loop, the sooner you'll know to walk away...
haha noted
Posted on 12/18/23 at 1:06 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Well let’s see, you’re saying states have no argument that an unconstitutionality elected POTUS can negatively affect them.
I never said that either
Posted on 12/18/23 at 1:18 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:See, that's where the """Standing""" argument falls flat. We are not talking about "interfering" with a state electing a governor. By engaging in unconstitutional electioneering, we are talking about one state doing more damage to another than a simple water rights dispute. Texas was specifically damaged.
I never said that either
Posted on 12/18/23 at 1:22 pm to NC_Tigah
You are mixing up procedural issues like standing with issue relating to the merits of the case.
Argument about the merits
Argument about the merits
I haven't commented about the merits at all. Standing is a procedural issue.
quote:
states have no argument that an unconstitutionality elected POTUS can negatively affect them.
Argument about the merits
quote:
states needn’t abide with the Constitution in appointing presidential electors
Argument about the merits
I haven't commented about the merits at all. Standing is a procedural issue.
Posted on 12/18/23 at 1:37 pm to the808bass
quote:A couple of Trump campaign operatives threatened Freeman with being arrested before she gave the statement.
Ruby basically admitted everything Rudy accused her of, and she did so on tape, in a police station, the whole situation is fairly quizzical.
Posted on 12/18/23 at 1:40 pm to texridder
Don’t quote me incorrectly, you dumb cünt. Get back in the kitchen.
Posted on 12/18/23 at 1:44 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Having the best system possible doesn't make it perfect.
And because it is imperfect we are allowed to criticize it and the gatekeepers of that system who so often abuse it.
This is such a case.
These cases against Trump are purely Political in nature with the intent of affecting the upcoming election.
Posted on 12/18/23 at 1:46 pm to oogabooga68
quote:
And because it is imperfect we are allowed to criticize it
Sure. He invalidated it, ad hoc, in terms of this discussion. That's beyond criticism.
quote:
These cases against Trump are purely Political in nature with the intent of affecting the upcoming election.
Cool. For this post I will agree fully. It still doesn't change the question:
quote:
Why have Trump, Rudy, et al waited so long to publicly release their evidence?
Posted on 12/18/23 at 1:47 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:You post this without ever providing a source
False. 100% complete BS! After inexplicable total pauses in tallying, Biden took immediate huge jumps in vote tallies in each instance when counts resumed.
Also you don't seem to acknowledge that there is a difference between counting and reporting.
Do you think they reported after every 10,000 votes were counted?
Posted on 12/18/23 at 1:50 pm to texridder
They used to report by precinct (which are fewer than 10,000). So the short answer is, yes.
The processing of mail-in votes as a separate entity in centralized locations allowed them to process hundreds of thousands of votes in batch. It enabled fraud. (And it slowed the count when they argued for centralizing the count for efficiency.)
The processing of mail-in votes as a separate entity in centralized locations allowed them to process hundreds of thousands of votes in batch. It enabled fraud. (And it slowed the count when they argued for centralizing the count for efficiency.)
Posted on 12/18/23 at 1:54 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:as it was in Georgia ... until it wasn't. In both instances, it was an excuse. As I've previously contended, Texas v. Pennsylvania was the worst SCOTUS decision since Dred Scott.
Standing is a procedural issue.
This post was edited on 12/18/23 at 4:52 pm
Posted on 12/18/23 at 1:56 pm to the808bass
quote:Heh, dumbass. I copied and pasted what I posted from one of your posts.
Don’t quote me incorrectly, you dumb cünt. Get back in the kitchen.
Are you ashamed of what you posted, or more likely, usimg this bullshite post to keep from having to actually respond?
Page 10 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News