- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why hasn’t anyone been arrested for the 2020 rigged election?
Posted on 12/19/25 at 12:11 pm to VOR
Posted on 12/19/25 at 12:11 pm to VOR
I don't think its proof either, nor did the dems when they did it and got away with it. But now we are seeing hundreds of thousands of margin-smashing ineligible votes that were counted in Georgia and Pennsylvania... along with thousands of non-citizens registered to vote in Texas, Virginia, and New Jersey - 50K in AZ alone. An Iraqi national in New York was prosecuted for illegally voting.... 19 non-citizens indicted in NC, etc...
Cato estimates between 10%-27% of non-citizens in the US are registered to vote and up to 13% have and will vote illegally.
Lets not pretend this isn't a real problem just because you like the side that got away with it.
Cato estimates between 10%-27% of non-citizens in the US are registered to vote and up to 13% have and will vote illegally.
Lets not pretend this isn't a real problem just because you like the side that got away with it.
0
Posted on 12/19/25 at 12:13 pm to RogerTheShrubber
stop, MIV and covid voting programs were passed at the state level.
Posted on 12/19/25 at 12:15 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
You thought this was a gotcha?
Why is the red line misrepresented in the "USA" chart?
quote:
There was ONLY ONE voting demographic that favored Biden by those margins. Blacks
I disagree. Blacks aren't the only people too lazy to get off their butts and go to the poll to vote. There are a lot of other kinds of lazy Democrats.
Posted on 12/19/25 at 12:17 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
stop, MIV and covid voting programs were passed at the state level.
Trump signed the bill allowing these changes.
Posted on 12/19/25 at 12:19 pm to RogerTheShrubber
no. they were happening with or without cares.
make a better argument.
make a better argument.
Posted on 12/19/25 at 12:21 pm to Harry Boutte
you can disagree all you like. The exit polling is documented by leftist pollsters no less. Those dump margins are unrealistic and dont track with demographics.
Posted on 12/19/25 at 12:23 pm to AlwysATgr
quote:
If as you assert, the red line is behind the blue line, where does this 4:1 difference show on the graph?
At about 4:30 both lines jump almost vertically, the blue line at about a 4:1 rate. The reason you don't see the red line is because it is behind the blue line, and is near vertical at the same time.
And CLEARLY the red line is behind the blue line, look at the chart on Nov. 3 from about 9 pm to 11 pm as the red line moves in and out of view from behind the blue line. Where is the red line from 0 - 5,000 votes? Does it just start at 5,000 votes, and not 0?
Posted on 12/19/25 at 12:24 pm to Sassafrasology
Because it wasn’t rigged.
Posted on 12/19/25 at 12:25 pm to how333
quote:
Jails aren't big enough.
Phantoms don't take any real room at all.
Posted on 12/19/25 at 12:26 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
or without cares.
Wrong. Not sure if youre lying or coping
Posted on 12/19/25 at 12:26 pm to Flats
quote:
You've seen a lot of national elections where people wearing masks and gloves are dropping off piles of ballots
No, but a lot of masking laws were suspended because of COVID.
I've also never heard a sitting president beg a governor for votes before either.
None of which is direct evidence of fraud.
Posted on 12/19/25 at 12:29 pm to Vacherie Saint
Why does the "USA" chart show the red line crossing the blue line at @ 4:30, when the data clearly show it jumped at the same time as the blue line?
Posted on 12/19/25 at 12:32 pm to Harry Boutte
quote:
At about 4:30 both lines jump almost vertically, the blue line at about a 4:1 rate. The reason you don't see the red line is because it is behind the blue line, and is near vertical at the same time.
If the blue line is obscuring the red line, there is no 4 votes dem to 1 vote rep difference reflected in the graphics. If OTOH, you're referring to the slope, they would have the same slope in order for the blue to obscure the red. In that case, there is no "difference," only a common rate.
Posted on 12/19/25 at 12:34 pm to Stonehenge
quote:
Because it wasn’t rigged.
Was it anomalous?
Posted on 12/19/25 at 1:01 pm to Sassafrasology
Michael Laiss for double voting in Pennsylvania and Florida
Jenna Ellis in Georgia(Plead guilty)
Kenneth Chesbro in Georgia
Sidney Powell in Georgia(Plead guilty)
Tina Peters in Colorado
Jim Troupis and Mike Roman’s trial is set to go forward in Wisconsin. They settled their civil suit
There has been a lot of people charged.
Jenna Ellis in Georgia(Plead guilty)
Kenneth Chesbro in Georgia
Sidney Powell in Georgia(Plead guilty)
Tina Peters in Colorado
Jim Troupis and Mike Roman’s trial is set to go forward in Wisconsin. They settled their civil suit
There has been a lot of people charged.
This post was edited on 12/19/25 at 1:20 pm
Posted on 12/19/25 at 1:03 pm to Sassafrasology
Don't worry. You'll finally get some free beer tomorrow.
Posted on 12/19/25 at 1:07 pm to Bbobalou
quote:
Did they remove the votes for trump then? Just wondering
Posted on 12/19/25 at 1:15 pm to Sassafrasology
I can’t tell if this guy is actually this stupid, or if he’s just pretending to be this stupid. Either way, he’s not qualified to be in the position he is.
“It’s not what you know, it’s what you can prove.”
Possible statue of limitations complications.
Not all acts of “fraud” or “rigging” are necessarily a straightforward violation of any law on the books.
**Just a few thoughts of very possible relevance that come to mind that this buffoon conveniently elects to leave out. Or, again, maybe he’s simply not equipped to grasp the wide array of very realistic possibilities and factors. Maybe, maybe not, but to play the simpleton about it is rather pathetic.
“It’s not what you know, it’s what you can prove.”
Possible statue of limitations complications.
Not all acts of “fraud” or “rigging” are necessarily a straightforward violation of any law on the books.
**Just a few thoughts of very possible relevance that come to mind that this buffoon conveniently elects to leave out. Or, again, maybe he’s simply not equipped to grasp the wide array of very realistic possibilities and factors. Maybe, maybe not, but to play the simpleton about it is rather pathetic.
Posted on 12/19/25 at 1:17 pm to AlwysATgr
According to the chart, at about 4:30 in the morning, the Republicans went from about 1,530,000 to about 1,570,000, a difference of around 40,000.
At the same time, and almost the same slope, the Democrats went from about 1,430,000 to about 1,570,000, a difference of around 140,000.
140:40 = 3.5:1 ratio of D votes to R votes at 4:30 am. That could be explained in any number of ways - including fraud.
That's not my point.
My point is that this graph (meme):
Is not just propaganda, but bad propaganda. Any Soviet would tell you that good propaganda uses the truth, and lies by omission. This chart clearly misrepresents the data. It would be more effective if they simply left the red line out to the right of the blue line instead of extending it across.
What this shows is the naivete of the American voter compared to your average Russian voter. They would never fall for such an obvious ploy.
But my question is, why lie in the first place? If the case was so strong for fraud, why would anyone feel they had to lie with this graph?
My conclusion is that it can only be because they don't have confidence in the evidence of fraud.
At the same time, and almost the same slope, the Democrats went from about 1,430,000 to about 1,570,000, a difference of around 140,000.
140:40 = 3.5:1 ratio of D votes to R votes at 4:30 am. That could be explained in any number of ways - including fraud.
That's not my point.
My point is that this graph (meme):
Is not just propaganda, but bad propaganda. Any Soviet would tell you that good propaganda uses the truth, and lies by omission. This chart clearly misrepresents the data. It would be more effective if they simply left the red line out to the right of the blue line instead of extending it across.
What this shows is the naivete of the American voter compared to your average Russian voter. They would never fall for such an obvious ploy.
But my question is, why lie in the first place? If the case was so strong for fraud, why would anyone feel they had to lie with this graph?
My conclusion is that it can only be because they don't have confidence in the evidence of fraud.
Posted on 12/19/25 at 1:20 pm to Harry Boutte
It's intended to be illustrative of the fraud state behaviors across the nation not the an accurate graph of specific results.
That's obvious to anyone.
Your post is nonsense.
That's obvious to anyone.
Your post is nonsense.
Page 6 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News