- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Why has society so rapidly and thoroughly bought into global warming / climate change?
Posted on 9/20/19 at 10:05 am
Posted on 9/20/19 at 10:05 am
For the sake of this discussion let’s imagine the science is correct. What percentage of the public actually understands the science they believe in?
How is it any different than a religion for most people?
How is it any different than a religion for most people?
Posted on 9/20/19 at 10:06 am to weagle99
Propaganda from the powers that be
Posted on 9/20/19 at 10:07 am to weagle99
Never be ignorant of the large amount of ignorance.
Posted on 9/20/19 at 10:08 am to weagle99
Shitty, emotional female teachers
Posted on 9/20/19 at 10:10 am to weagle99
No idea why so many doubt and mock the existence of the new world order
Climate change is the number one vehicle to usher in a new world order with socialism on a global scale
Climate change is the number one vehicle to usher in a new world order with socialism on a global scale
Posted on 9/20/19 at 10:11 am to weagle99
It isn't different then a religion.
This post was edited on 9/20/19 at 10:12 am
Posted on 9/20/19 at 10:12 am to weagle99
The only thing most people understand or know about are the extremes of the forecasts that these government agencies publish. All of the doomsday articles are based on the most extreme scenarios at the upper bounds of probabilty. Financial modeling is more exact than climate modeling, and that's why it's hilarious when a believer points to the "science." They typcially don't refer to the science at all, it's the integrated assesment models (IAW) they point to.
Posted on 9/20/19 at 10:12 am to weagle99
School mostly, but any remotely scientific channel or program on TV mentions it.
Hell, even Sig on Deadliest Catch has mentioned it, although it seemed scripted.
Hell, even Sig on Deadliest Catch has mentioned it, although it seemed scripted.
Posted on 9/20/19 at 10:15 am to weagle99
"society" hasn't. Just the entertainment industry has and they push it every chance they get. Wonder why that is?
Posted on 9/20/19 at 10:15 am to weagle99
Fear can be very powerful
There are kids out there that are terrified over the world ending in 12 years nonsense because that’s all they know
There are kids out there that are terrified over the world ending in 12 years nonsense because that’s all they know
Posted on 9/20/19 at 10:16 am to blowmeauburn
The republicans were pussies and let the dems control the narrative to the point you are a pariah if you dispute it.
Posted on 9/20/19 at 10:17 am to weagle99
The modern, leftist environmental movement in the United States congealed around a false premise - Rachel Carson's Silent Spring.
This sparked the popular movement that resulted in the creation of the EPA, Earth Day (and proto-AGW cultists/terrorists like Earth First, etc.) and all that. Prior to that, "environmentalists" in the U.S. were mainly conservative types - outdoorsmen, Boy Scouts, businessmen who wanted to enjoy the wilderness on the weekends, fishermen, hunters, etc.
But, the Green movement doesn't want to preserve the environment for humanity - they have elevated the environment to a level above humanity, in a form of pseudo-scientific, Neopaganism which contemplates things like plants having feelings, no utilization of animals (even animals who have been domesticated since the Stone Age), etc.
And if that means hundreds of millions (or billions) of human beings must suffer or even die, then so be it.
And AGW was a strange confluence of academia, the Green movement and the political left. By demonizing CO2, you're demonizing energy production. By controlling that, you control every aspect of human activity from soup to nuts.
It isn't any more complicated than that.
This sparked the popular movement that resulted in the creation of the EPA, Earth Day (and proto-AGW cultists/terrorists like Earth First, etc.) and all that. Prior to that, "environmentalists" in the U.S. were mainly conservative types - outdoorsmen, Boy Scouts, businessmen who wanted to enjoy the wilderness on the weekends, fishermen, hunters, etc.
But, the Green movement doesn't want to preserve the environment for humanity - they have elevated the environment to a level above humanity, in a form of pseudo-scientific, Neopaganism which contemplates things like plants having feelings, no utilization of animals (even animals who have been domesticated since the Stone Age), etc.
And if that means hundreds of millions (or billions) of human beings must suffer or even die, then so be it.
And AGW was a strange confluence of academia, the Green movement and the political left. By demonizing CO2, you're demonizing energy production. By controlling that, you control every aspect of human activity from soup to nuts.
It isn't any more complicated than that.
Posted on 9/20/19 at 10:19 am to weagle99
quote:
Why has society so rapidly and thoroughly bought into global warming / climate change?
I just got back from vacation to Iceland. If it was just a little bit warmer up there they could grow grain crops instead of grass to feed sheep. Iceland would benefit from being a little warmer.
Posted on 9/20/19 at 10:19 am to weagle99
Fear, ignorance, and money. STEM education in US public schools is shite but government and left-wing donors are throwing money at the stupidity because they know a blunt brain is a great bludgeon for societal change. Just look at the crowd-source funding of things like Waterseer, Fontus, Solar Roadways, etc. All promised to be "disrupters" and all little more than junk created by those educated by grade school science projects.
This post was edited on 9/20/19 at 10:24 am
Posted on 9/20/19 at 10:21 am to weagle99
I mean we kind of rapidly started doing stuff that messes with the climate? I'd argue the industrial revolution is when we started pumping various chemicals out, and that was what the 1700s? I'm not ignorant enough to believe we have zero affect, but I also think it's insane people want to go back to starving millions just to solve something that technology will solve sooner than later.
Posted on 9/20/19 at 10:22 am to Animal
quote:THIS!!
Children and schools
Literally drilled into their heads weekly from Pre-K through college graduation.
Any challenge to this push is squashed. Perhaps the greatest example of school bullying in the last 30 years. Day after day, week after week, year after year.
Posted on 9/20/19 at 10:23 am to Jcorye1
quote:
have zero affect
Mother Earth does not operate in a zero affect mode. She has always changed and always will. We humans are just along for the ride for a short while.
Posted on 9/20/19 at 10:24 am to weagle99
quote:
For the sake of this discussion let’s imagine the science is correct. What percentage of the public actually understands the science they believe in?
How is it any different than a religion for most people?
We're talking about kids and adults that likely can't add fractions. I'm going with 90% couldn't begin to grasp the science.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News