- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 5/29/26 at 8:06 pm to Bunk Moreland
Posted on 5/29/26 at 8:14 pm to Bunk Moreland
quote:
I bet he would take a repackaged JCPOA if he could. There was nothing wrong with it. But, he has backed himself into a corner and doesn't have a good way out.
You really have no idea what you’re saying, do you? Too worried about dissing Trump to realize how damn ignorant you sound. The JCPOA obviously didn’t work, hence having to pry the uranium from their cold, dead hands. 
Posted on 5/29/26 at 8:32 pm to geauxEdO
1. We were told Iran’s capacity to develop nuclear weapons was totally eliminated and that it would take several years for them to restore the program. That was a statement by Tulsi Gabbard after Midnight Hammer.
2. There are over 30 US military bases that literally encircle Iran, housing about 50,000 American troops. If Iran were interested in a nuclear confrontation with the U.S., it would not end well for them. We could very easily intercept it due to the distance from the U.S. mainland and our surface to surface air systems. Again, we were told that the capacity for them to even develop a nuclear weapon was eliminated.
3. Iran is surrounded by India, Pakistan, Israel, and Turkey. India has 180 nuclear warheads, Pakistan has 170, and Israel has 90. Turkey hosts US nuclear weapons as part of a nuclear sharing agreement with NATO. If Canada and Mexico each had at least 90 nuclear weapons and we didn’t, we’d probably feel pretty vulnerable and would be trying to develop our own. There is one country that absolutely does not want Iran to have nuclear weapons, and that’s Israel. Lebanon, another neighbor of Iran, signed a Nonproliferation agreement in 1970 that Israel refused to sign, and 12 years later, the Israelis invaded.
2. There are over 30 US military bases that literally encircle Iran, housing about 50,000 American troops. If Iran were interested in a nuclear confrontation with the U.S., it would not end well for them. We could very easily intercept it due to the distance from the U.S. mainland and our surface to surface air systems. Again, we were told that the capacity for them to even develop a nuclear weapon was eliminated.
3. Iran is surrounded by India, Pakistan, Israel, and Turkey. India has 180 nuclear warheads, Pakistan has 170, and Israel has 90. Turkey hosts US nuclear weapons as part of a nuclear sharing agreement with NATO. If Canada and Mexico each had at least 90 nuclear weapons and we didn’t, we’d probably feel pretty vulnerable and would be trying to develop our own. There is one country that absolutely does not want Iran to have nuclear weapons, and that’s Israel. Lebanon, another neighbor of Iran, signed a Nonproliferation agreement in 1970 that Israel refused to sign, and 12 years later, the Israelis invaded.
Posted on 5/29/26 at 8:34 pm to geauxEdO
Cause they'll put people out the with spoons, digging to get to that shite.
Dude, it's all they think about...they want us all dead.
Think about it, stupid amounts of easy to get to oil, and instead of being wealthy flourishing country, they get together and talk about killing the west.
Dude, it's all they think about...they want us all dead.
Think about it, stupid amounts of easy to get to oil, and instead of being wealthy flourishing country, they get together and talk about killing the west.
Posted on 5/29/26 at 8:39 pm to Wareagle1990
Now where is it again that they said, specifically, “that it would take several years to restore the program”? That’s kind of a key facet to this whole thing, and that language would be quite significant, in fact the most significant thing mentioned in your post. So exact language like that would be something to key in on for you haters out there. The quoted language is necessary to give your point any credibility though.
Posted on 5/29/26 at 8:42 pm to Burt Reynolds
quote:
You can mine it then enrich it
Not that hard
It's actually very difficult and very expensive to mine and enrich, having to start over without what they have already worked on is a pretty significant setback.
Posted on 5/29/26 at 8:45 pm to Clames
True words, pretty much as a matter of common sense. How could someone even participate in discussion of this topic without having picked up on all the banter the past several years about the Iranians’ long and winding road to uranium enrichment, centrifuges, etc etc.
Posted on 5/29/26 at 8:46 pm to geauxEdO
Get to find out if Hilary and Obama's handprints are all over it.
Posted on 5/29/26 at 9:36 pm to Clames
quote:
It's actually very difficult and very expensive to mine and enrich
It’s doable and they will do it. Doesn’t matter what we do. They will still be able to get it
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News