- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why do American Christians support Israel?
Posted on 5/17/21 at 11:13 pm to Roger Klarvin
Posted on 5/17/21 at 11:13 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:
American christians believe lots of things previously unheard of in the entirety of christian theology.
The theme that the Jews are God’s chosen people is woven throughout the entire Bible and isn’t some new teaching.
Posted on 5/17/21 at 11:17 pm to Craig86
The Zionists are using the evangelicals.
It is manipulative, and they consider the evangelicals “dupes”.
It is manipulative, and they consider the evangelicals “dupes”.
Posted on 5/17/21 at 11:17 pm to SCLibertarian
quote:
John Hagee's dispensationalist heresy is one of them.
The 100% literal, six day creation and 6-10k year geneology as described in Genesis is the most intriguing to me. It's an entirely indefensible, easily falsifiable idea held by tens of millions of American christians and virtually completely absent from the rest of the christian world or christian history. Even early Jewish theologians, and virtually all of the early church fathers, read the early parts of Genesis prior to the flood account as partially or entirely symbolic. Mainstream orthodox Jewish thought has ALWAYS been that the creation account is non-literal.
But Jim Bob from small town Alabama thousands of years after the fact has finally figured it out.
This post was edited on 5/17/21 at 11:20 pm
Posted on 5/17/21 at 11:22 pm to Craig86
quote:
But one thing that has always confused me is that Christians believe Jesus Christ is the Messiah and as far as I understand it Jewish people do not believe he was the Messiah and they are currently still waiting on the Messiah to arrive.
See the thing about Jesus is....he was a Jew.
Posted on 5/17/21 at 11:25 pm to Lima Whiskey
quote:
and they consider the evangelicals “dupes”.
I mean, it's hard to argue otherwise when you compare mainstream evangelical/baptist theology that of high protestantism/catholicism/eastern orthodoxy. From the outside looking in, American evangelical theology is extremely shallow and lacking sound apologetics. It's the Natty Light of christianity, and as much a political ideology as a religious one in many ways.
This post was edited on 5/17/21 at 11:27 pm
Posted on 5/17/21 at 11:28 pm to Lima Whiskey
quote:
The Zionists are using the evangelicals.
The evangelicals are by definition Zionists.
Posted on 5/17/21 at 11:31 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:
I mean, it's hard to argue otherwise when you compare mainstream evangelical/baptist theology that of high protestantism/catholicism/eastern orthodoxy. From the outside looking in, American evangelical theology is extremely shallow and lacking sound apologetics. It's the Natty Light of christianity, and as much a political ideology as a religious one in many ways.
So the Roman Catholic Church which has tons of church writings, writs, dogmas, papal bulls, encyclicals, etc. many which completely contradict the others, somehow has more theological weight than a group like the Baptist who mostly rely on the Bible alone? Ok.
This post was edited on 5/17/21 at 11:33 pm
Posted on 5/17/21 at 11:31 pm to jimbeam
The Jews was not the reason Christ was crucified. Christ was crucified because God willed it. God sent Christ to die on the cross to save us from sin. It was going to happen no matter if the Jews turned Christ over to the Romans or not. You can’t blame the Jews for doing something that God had intended to happen in the first place.
Posted on 5/17/21 at 11:32 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:The problem with modern interpretations of Genesis that aren't depicting a literal 6-day creation is not the interpretation, per se, but the reasons for it. It's usually done to support evolutionary time scales and teachings. Unfortunately, it's not just the age of the earth that has theological issues, but it's the notion of physical death before sin (of man) among other things that impacts theology.
The 100% literal, six day creation and 6-10k year geneology as described in Genesis is the most intriguing to me. It's an entirely indefensible, easily falsifiable idea held by tens of millions of American christians and virtually completely absent from the rest of the christian world or christian history. Even early Jewish theologians, and virtually all of the early church fathers, read the early parts of Genesis prior to the flood account as partially or entirely symbolic. Mainstream orthodox Jewish thought has ALWAYS been that the creation account is non-literal.
But Jim Bob from small town Alabama thousands of years after the fact has finally figured it out.
If all that was at stake was just the age of the earth, it probably wouldn't be as contentious of a topic, but the underlying reason why it's even discussed is because of other issues at play, such as attempting to interpret the Bible by scientific understanding of fallible humans rather than by what the scriptures say within their historical contexts as breathed from God, Himself.
Posted on 5/17/21 at 11:33 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:I think we've found some common ground, at last
I mean, it's hard to argue otherwise when you compare mainstream evangelical/baptist theology that of high protestantism/catholicism/eastern orthodoxy. From the outside looking in, American evangelical theology is extremely shallow and lacking sound apologetics. It's the Natty Light of christianity, and as much a political ideology as a religious one in many ways.
Posted on 5/17/21 at 11:33 pm to Roger Klarvin
The 6 day creation makes total sense when you understand relativity - what’s billion of years to us could easily be 6 days to God. In Peter it says a day is like a thousand years to God. Time is relative. .
Posted on 5/17/21 at 11:33 pm to RollingwiththeTide
quote:
The Jews was not the reason Christ was crucified. Christ was crucified because God willed it. God sent Christ to die on the cross to save us from sin. It was going to happen no matter if the Jews turned Christ over to the Romans or not. You can’t blame the Jews for doing something that God had intended to happen in the first place.
Exactly. The Bible even says the Jews hearts were hardened for a season specifically so that salvation could also come to the Gentiles.
Posted on 5/17/21 at 11:43 pm to Revelator
quote:
So the Roman Catholic Church which has tons of church writings, writs, dogmas, papal bulls, encyclicals, etc. many which completely contradict the others, somehow has more theological weight than a group like the Baptist who mostly rely on the Bible alone? Ok.
Simplistic assurance is virtually always a cognitive defense mechanism for an overall lack of knowledge and understanding. In other words, the more ignorant one is the less they understand how little they actually know.
The most "certain" types of religious people are almost always those with the most simplistic, shallow theology. There's a clear reason for this.
Posted on 5/17/21 at 11:45 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:
The most "certain" types of religious people are almost always those with the most simplistic, shallow theology. There's a clear reason for this.
Jesus said that unless we had faith like a little child, we wouldn’t even see heaven. So the Gospel need not be complex.
Posted on 5/17/21 at 11:46 pm to Craig86
quote:
And some people would say that the Jews were the reason that Jesus was crucified.
quote:
At least you hear things like that and from movies like the passion of the Christ.
Have you ever picked up a Bible? Let me introduce you to the Gospels.
Posted on 5/17/21 at 11:47 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
I think we've found some common ground, at last
I mean, there are always varying degrees of wrong
It's impossible to objectively watch a learned catholic or orthodox theologian defend their faith, then watch a southern baptist do the same, and come away thinking they are on equal theological footing. Theology slowly ironed out and dissected over thousands of years is always going to appear more refined and sound than a cheap off brand quickly woven together over a couple hundred years.
This post was edited on 5/17/21 at 11:48 pm
Posted on 5/17/21 at 11:52 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:
Theology slowly ironed out and dissected over thousands of years is always going to appear more refined and sound than a cheap off brand quickly woven together over a couple hundred years.
Bad or incorrect theology doesn’t magically get better because of time. Besides, just because the Baptist as a religious group are relatively new, doesn’t mean their theology is also new.
This post was edited on 5/17/21 at 11:56 pm
Posted on 5/17/21 at 11:55 pm to Shamoan
quote:
God’s chosen people. / thread
Why would God's chosen people be those who reject Jesus Christ and hate on those who believe in Jesus?
Posted on 5/17/21 at 11:58 pm to jimbeam
quote:
i mean how can this be refuted
Well the Romans crucified a lot of people in a lot of countries for lots of reasons.
They were historically big fans of crucifying people.
Posted on 5/17/21 at 11:58 pm to Lima Whiskey
quote:This imo is the best and truest answer.
The Zionists are using the evangelicals. It is manipulative, and they consider the evangelicals “dupes”.
This post was edited on 5/18/21 at 12:03 am
Popular
Back to top


1






