- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Who is Vindman and what did he do?
Posted on 11/20/19 at 3:19 pm to AggieHank86
Posted on 11/20/19 at 3:19 pm to AggieHank86
He is an embarrassment to the U. S. Army!
0
Posted on 11/20/19 at 3:43 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
The simple fact is that I do not have much respect for the intelligence of several posters on this thread. I do not doubt that they were able to follow orders at some point in their lives, but I doubt that they could analyze their way out od a wet paper bag. As such, I tend to doubt that this issue is nearly as clear-cut as they assert. I do think that Centinel is brighter than some of the others, so I have focused my questions upon him.
This tells you everything you need to know about the author.
Posted on 11/20/19 at 3:44 pm to homesicktiger
He is a giant prick.
Posted on 11/20/19 at 3:46 pm to roadGator
quote:And you are a mildly annoying little one.
He is a giant prick.
Posted on 11/20/19 at 3:49 pm to AggieHank86
Oh hero hank. Bless your heart.
Posted on 11/20/19 at 3:49 pm to homesicktiger
quote:
This tells you everything you need to know about the author.
I always have to chuckle when Hank, a guy who exhibits all the classic characteristics of a two-dimensional thinker and doesn’t appear to be very quick on his feet, denigrates the intellect of other posters on this board.
Posted on 11/20/19 at 3:58 pm to AggieHank86
He is pretty famous, he one time stated "what is there to it, you just get a boner, slap her titties around some and then stick it in her and pee"
This post was edited on 11/20/19 at 4:08 pm
Posted on 11/20/19 at 4:01 pm to tigerfoot
quote:
He is pretty famous, he one time stated "what is there to it, you just get a boner, slap her kitties around some and then stick it in her and pee"
WTF?
I don’t know what any of that means, but it’s the post of the day.
Posted on 11/20/19 at 4:15 pm to civiltiger07
quote:
He leaked what he thought was the content of the July 25th phone call to the "whistleblower".
...in one fricking post and a single sentence you have destroyed Hank’s attempt to control the narrative.
He leaked. Worse, he was wrong. And lastly, he is playing a part as a witness anyway to accomplish a political goal.
He’s absolutely a traitor. And he looks and acts exactly like the other effeminate Democrats look and act.
Posted on 11/20/19 at 4:48 pm to moneyg
quote:Hank doesn't give up that easy.
..in one fricking post and a single sentence you have destroyed Hank’s attempt to control the narrative.
Posted on 11/20/19 at 5:04 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
But I think it is subject to interpretation
Everything is subject to interpretation, boomer.
We’re talking about unseating a duly elected president here, so tread carefully with all of your “election interference” bluster.
You dodged my question. Are you ok with dems trying to remove a president based on what they “think” his intentions are? If your answer is anything but no, then you can frick off as far as I’m concerned. And I’d say it the same if it were republicans.
Posted on 11/20/19 at 5:10 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:No, I did not.
You dodged my question. Are you ok with dems trying to remove a president based on what they “think” his intentions are? If your answer is anything but no, then you can frick off as far as I’m concerned. And I’d say it the same if it were republicans.
Personally, I “think” that his intentions were entirely improper. I am utterly convinced that he was attempting to use our foreign-policy to bash a domestic political opponent.
Nonetheless, I would not support impeaching him for doing so. I do not see that as a “high crime or misdemeanor.” I do think that it confirms him as unfit for office, and that a thinking electorate would remove him in the next GOP primary. But I am not holding my breath. I stopped believing that we had a “thinking electorate” a long time ago.
Why is this hard to understand?
BTW, you missed my age by a year.
This post was edited on 11/20/19 at 5:12 pm
Posted on 11/20/19 at 5:30 pm to AggieHank86
I didn’t ask you if you thought impeachment was “worth it”. I asked you if you are OK with dems using impeachment as a political tool.
That’s what’s happening here, btw. In case you are a little slow on the uptake.
That’s what’s happening here, btw. In case you are a little slow on the uptake.
This post was edited on 11/20/19 at 5:46 pm
Posted on 11/20/19 at 5:46 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:How many times need I say “kabuki” — or must I explain the reference for you?
dems using impeachment as a political tool.
That’s what’s happening here, btw. In case you are a little slow on the uptake.
Posted on 11/20/19 at 9:01 pm to AggieHank86
Jesus.
Let me try again. If the dems had a majority in the senate, they would remove Trump from office.
Are you ok with that? The answer is clearly; yes.
Let me try again. If the dems had a majority in the senate, they would remove Trump from office.
Are you ok with that? The answer is clearly; yes.
Posted on 11/20/19 at 9:06 pm to AggieHank86
Yes you frame it as rape.
But here you watch.
But here you watch.
Posted on 11/20/19 at 10:17 pm to AggieHank86
Vindman will soon to be someone's bitch in Leavenworth. He's going to wish he had taken that Minister of defense offer 
Posted on 11/20/19 at 10:30 pm to AggieHank86
quote:I don't believe that. After Russian collusion failed the Dems went fishing and found someone like-minded who was willing to act as if he was concerned about impropriety in domain. After this fails they'll find more career bureaucrats willing to act concerned.
Rightly or wrongly, he was concerned about the propriety of certain elements of that call
Posted on 11/20/19 at 10:37 pm to Jake88
quote:
I don't believe that.
I don’t either. This guy, like Strzok, Comey, Brennan, Sondlan and countless others are just #resist twats. None of them have any credibility.
Posted on 11/21/19 at 12:19 am to Centinel
It's amazing how many people that never served nor have any familiarity with the military, are suddenly experts on their SOPs.
This post was edited on 11/21/19 at 12:20 am
Page 12 of 13
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News