Started By
Message

re: Who is to blame for this alleged disappearance of the middle class?

Posted on 1/30/14 at 8:06 am to
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
425819 posts
Posted on 1/30/14 at 8:06 am to
quote:

Even the New York Times and the Washington Post have admitted it
Median Household Income Down 7.3% Since Start of Recession
Chart: Median household incomes have collapsed since the recession
Report: Household income below end-of-recession

salaries collapsing are a sign that they were previously inflated more than "the middle class is dead"
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162294 posts
Posted on 1/30/14 at 8:13 am to
quote:

I believe that for the most part debt accumulation is due to easy access to credit, undisciplined borrowers and people with a psychological addiction to spending.

More regulation on banking practices could help alleviate this

The banks make obscene profits off the least credit worthy of their investors and when the shite hits the fan it has ramifications for the economy at large. Then we the tax payers come to the rescue and the cycle repeats.

The large banking institutions in this country are a bigger threat to upward mobility than the government could ever dream of being.
Posted by bigblake
Member since Jun 2011
2502 posts
Posted on 1/30/14 at 8:22 am to
(no message)
This post was edited on 2/25/14 at 12:44 am
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162294 posts
Posted on 1/30/14 at 8:30 am to
quote:

Academia and the idea that every person needs to go to college. Americans getting too good to learn a trade but not too good to accept government handouts. Poor leadership...baby boomers.



These are all factors. I do think that we probably have too many people in college. But in addition to that our high school curriculum is lacking to adequately educate the populace.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
36533 posts
Posted on 1/30/14 at 8:39 am to
quote:

People blame the government for the financial collapse all the time. But it seems as if financial institutions had as much of an impact as the government if not more. The very nature of the banking industry is to hope for people to manage credit as poorly as possible so they can get the most out of them in terms of interest and penalties. An unchecked private banking industry is certainly not a good thing for the economy. They have a vested interest in the poor staying where they are IMO.


Government policies and politics helped create the atmosphere around the financial collapse and the fact the govt. bailed out those that were too big to fail help create an atmosphere for the next collapse.

But finjancial institutions don't want everyone poor. That's crazy talk. They want everyone prosperous. They want prosperity. The want to loan money and they want to get paid back.

The banks don't want your house, your car, all they want is their principal and interest on time.

Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162294 posts
Posted on 1/30/14 at 8:42 am to
quote:



Government policies and politics helped create the atmosphere around the financial collapse

Please explain why you believe this to be true.

quote:

and the fact the govt. bailed out those that were too big to fail help create an atmosphere for the next collapse.

Agreed

quote:

But finjancial institutions don't want everyone poor. That's crazy talk. They want everyone prosperous. They want prosperity. The want to loan money and they want to get paid back.


But their most profitable customers are the people living check to check that depend on credit.

quote:

The banks don't want your house, your car, all they want is their principal and interest on time.


Why would they want it on time? Wouldn't they prefer you to be late or over your credit limit every now and then? You're still required to pay it back and they can tack on penalties, increase your interest rate...
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
36533 posts
Posted on 1/30/14 at 8:53 am to
quote:

Please explain why you believe this to be true


1)Politicians tell us we all need to go to college or else we are reserved for a pitiful existence. People rob Peter (their future) to pay Paul(their universities) to get a degree that if they do get a good job it will take years to pay for. College isn't a cure all, and there are other ways to get an education besides borrowing thousands of dollars.

2) Look at govt. regulations that put a burden on financial institutions to provide reasons behind them turning people down. You can be sued for turning down too many of a certain kind of folk.

3) The notion that owning your own home is a desired goal of everyone and creating Fannie and Freddie to "guarantee" mortgage payments, etc. caused a feeling of euphoria and many were able to get loans way beyond their means. It wasn't credit card debt that brought the house down, It was mortgage based securities.

4) Many in govt. warned about what was happening, but the Dems in Congress laughed at the skeptics. Remember Barney Frank?

5) The banks most profitable customers pay on time. Banks don't want to hire people to collect, they don't want to hire layers to sue, they don't want to hire real estate people to sell possessed properties. They don't want to be stuck with cars, boats, condos, office buildings and homes.

6) You are looking only at credit card debt, but I don't remember credit card debt being the reason behind the collapse of the big banks. Wasn't it loans given out for homes and properties?

Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162294 posts
Posted on 1/30/14 at 8:57 am to
quote:

2) Look at govt. regulations that put a burden on financial institutions to provide reasons behind them turning people down. You can be sued for turning down too many of a certain kind of folk.

I don't buy this

If anything the government lets the banks get away with lending to too many people who aren't credit worthy, hence the problem. And the banks WANT to do that.

quote:

3) The notion that owning your own home is a desired goal of everyone and creating Fannie and Freddie to "guarantee" mortgage payments, etc. caused a feeling of euphoria and many were able to get loans way beyond their means. It wasn't credit card debt that brought the house down, It was mortgage based securities.

Agreed

quote:


4) Many in govt. warned about what was happening, but the Dems in Congress laughed at the skeptics. Remember Barney Frank?


This isn't only a democrat problem but I do agree on Frank

quote:

5) The banks most profitable customers pay on time.


No. Their most profitable customers are the people who make minimum credit card payments until the day they die.

quote:


6) You are looking only at credit card debt, but I don't remember credit card debt being the reason behind the collapse of the big banks. Wasn't it loans given out for homes and properties?



Right. Loans that banks voluntarily issued without the coercion of government. And you can bet in some instances the inability to pay those loans was based on other debt burdens that had left those people in a less than ideal economic situation over the years.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
36533 posts
Posted on 1/30/14 at 9:01 am to
You are proving my points, but you are fixiated on credit card debt.

Credit card debt is a real problem.

Would it be if interest rates were deregulated? Would it be as big of a problem if people had to pay more interest and had to have higher qualifications to get a card?

If you use a credit card and do not pay all of the principal off every month, you are a fool.

Whose fault is that? The banks????
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162294 posts
Posted on 1/30/14 at 9:03 am to
quote:

Would it be as big of a problem if people had to pay more interest and had to have higher qualifications to get a card?


I think the problem would definitely not be as bad if the qualifications were more stringent.

Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
36533 posts
Posted on 1/30/14 at 9:17 am to
quote:

I think the problem would definitely not be as bad if the qualifications were more stringent.


If people with credit cards had a better grasp on finances and how compound interest works we'd all be better off.

HS should teach a lot of this in a basic civics class.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162294 posts
Posted on 1/30/14 at 9:18 am to
quote:


If people with credit cards had a better grasp on finances and how compound interest works we'd all be better off.


Well obviously a lot of them don't. And the banks are very happy that they don't. This much should be obvious.
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
53077 posts
Posted on 1/30/14 at 9:19 am to
quote:

But I do think that financial institutions are probably part of the problem as well. The practice of extending credit to people that aren't really credit worthy creates a cycle of "survival" style cost of living with the constant high interest debt payments that need to be made just to keep current.


You do realize, that the financial crisis of 08 was caused by the government incentivizing and in some cases, forcing banks to extend loans to those who do not qualify for them, right?

So you are correct that the banks shoulder some responsibility, but the government bears the greatest responsibility.

Don't forget, Obamacare is one of the greatest hindrances to economic expansion of small business this country has seen.
5 million people have lost their insurance because of this act. Many more millions have had their rates increase significantly to be compliant with this law, and the business mandate hasn't even kicked in yet. The worst is yet to come. It will be a disaster of epic proportions.
Of course, a good conservative such as yourself (of which you claim) would know this.

Obamacare forces small businesses to either pay for their employees health insurance, or get penalized. This increased cost of insurance is then past on to the consumer, via higher product costs. These higher costs in turn, cause consumers to cut back on their spending, and reduce the amount of product they buy. That company must now make cut backs via lower wages, or laying off employees to try to maintain a steady profit margin. That in turn reduces the output of the company, resulting in less product, resulting in less profit, resulting in less pay to the employee , resulting in less economic spending freedom for that employee. And for what? To force Americans into a socialist health care program they do not want, that was passed in the name of affordable, which it is not; healthcare, which is lesser that before because good doctors/hospitals rightly refuse to accept socialist healthcare due to the problems with getting paid for the existing socialist healthcare program we are still paying for (medicare).
Posted by constant cough
Lafayette
Member since Jun 2007
44788 posts
Posted on 1/30/14 at 9:20 am to
quote:

The large banking institutions in this country are a bigger threat to upward mobility than the government could ever dream of being.



Maybe we should cut out all the QE money then huh?
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162294 posts
Posted on 1/30/14 at 9:22 am to
quote:


You do realize, that the financial crisis of 08 was caused by the government incentivizing and in some cases, forcing banks to extend loans to those who do not qualify for them, right?


I know a lot of stupid people that believe this.
quote:


So you are correct that the banks shoulder some responsibility, but the government bears the greatest responsibility.


Right. They should do a better job of regulating the banks.

quote:

Don't forget, Obamacare is one of the greatest hindrances to economic expansion of small business this country has seen.

It may very well be but I think it's a little early to tell.

quote:

The worst is yet to come.

I hope you're wrong since it's already been pretty bad.

Posted by notiger1997
Metairie
Member since May 2009
58486 posts
Posted on 1/30/14 at 9:22 am to
quote:

You do realize, that the financial crisis of 08 was caused by the government incentivizing and in some cases, forcing banks to extend loans to those who do not qualify for them, right?


This.
I still remember seeing some videos of some black members of congress going off on banks in some kind of hearing. Basically that it was their responsibility to do more to allow everyone to be able to get loans to buy homes.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
127260 posts
Posted on 1/30/14 at 9:22 am to
quote:

The banks make obscene profits off the least credit worthy of their investors
This makes zero sense.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162294 posts
Posted on 1/30/14 at 9:26 am to
quote:

This makes zero sense.


How does it not make sense? These people will pay stupid interest rates for credit. They're also likely to exceed their credit limit and rack up penalties and fees and have their interest rates jacked even higher.

Banks certainly make money off of low interest mortgages but their margins are much higher on high interest credit card debt. Some of the least credit worthy people have interest rates above 20% and they can get as high as 29% (or higher?) if they are late or over limit. Add in all the penalties for overages and late payments and it becomes very profitable. These people are also unlikely to be able to (or smart enough) to pay off their balances so they're going to make minimum payments for decades on a lot of these loans. That translates to a high profit margin for banks. Much higher than the margins on a 30 year mortgage.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162294 posts
Posted on 1/30/14 at 9:27 am to
quote:



This.
I still remember seeing some videos of some black members of congress going off on banks in some kind of hearing. Basically that it was their responsibility to do more to allow everyone to be able to get loans to buy homes.


People fussing on camera does not translate into legislated government coercion.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
36533 posts
Posted on 1/30/14 at 9:28 am to
quote:

Well obviously a lot of them don't. And the banks are very happy that they don't. This much should be obvious.


I don't see how it could be obvious.

When the economy went down the toilet, banks went broke.

When the economy went down the toilet, I'd bet bank revenues went down.

Profits might be up now, but that is because the govt. is enabling the banks with basically free money.

If you can't see that the banks dance to the tune the govt. plays then I can't help you.

Jump to page
Page First 3 4 5 6 7 ... 13
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 13Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram