Started By
Message

re: White House preparing for major narrative shift: sudden deaths = Long COVID, not the vaxx.

Posted on 1/13/23 at 7:33 am to
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
170315 posts
Posted on 1/13/23 at 7:33 am to
quote:

What evidence do they have that all these people are dying of Long Covid?

They're not necessarily dying of long covid

COVID infection, particularly serious COVID infection increases mortality rate significantly.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
170315 posts
Posted on 1/13/23 at 7:35 am to
quote:

Because there is evidence that mRNA vaccines cause Myocarditis.

At a rate lesser than actual COVID infection

COVID infectoin poses higher risk of myocarditis than vaccines

quote:

The detailed analysis of nearly 43 million people was published Monday in the American Heart Association journal Circulation.

"We found that across this large dataset, the entire COVID-19-vaccinated population of England during an important 12-month period of the pandemic when the COVID-19 vaccines first became available, the risk of myocarditis following COVID-19 vaccination was quite small compared to the risk of myocarditis after COVID-19 infection," the study's lead author, Martina Patone, said in a news release. She is a statistician at the University of Oxford Nuffield Department of Primary Health Care Sciences in England.


Posted by Blitzed
Member since Oct 2009
21937 posts
Posted on 1/13/23 at 7:36 am to
quote:

So your logic is that since I'm a construction manager the study that I provided is wrong


Yes.
Posted by member12
Bob's Country Bunker
Member since May 2008
33006 posts
Posted on 1/13/23 at 7:38 am to
quote:

At a rate lesser than actual COVID infection


Yeah. A lot of viral inflections cause it. But how do you prove that all these people dying had long Covid? And how do you prove it with enough certainty to “change the narrative” rather than just letting this play out?

White House should stay out of this.
This post was edited on 1/13/23 at 7:41 am
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
170315 posts
Posted on 1/13/23 at 7:40 am to
quote:


Yeah. But how do you prove that all these people dying had long Covid?


I don't think they necessarily had long COVID

Keep in mind this claim is just something that Gumbo Pot is posting on twitter and not the official stance of the White House

Studies have shown that mortality significantly increases after serious COVID infection and eventually attenuates over time

That doesn't mean that they had long COVID necessarily. It means that they were at increased risk of death.
Posted by Open Your Eyes
Member since Nov 2012
10284 posts
Posted on 1/13/23 at 7:42 am to
quote:

At a rate lesser than actual COVID infection

Skinsuit, attempt to explain why this is relevant when even the most ardent covid shot supporters, except for the “doctor” in this thread, acknowledge the shot does not prevent covid infection.
Posted by Bwmdx
Member since Dec 2018
3296 posts
Posted on 1/13/23 at 7:46 am to
Issue is there are people who had COVID before the vaccine and were also vaccinated and those who had the vaccine and then still got COVID. This may muddy the waters sufficiently that we can’t discern the degree each contributed to sudden death.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
170315 posts
Posted on 1/13/23 at 7:49 am to
quote:

attempt to explain why this is relevant when even the most ardent covid shot supporters, except for the “doctor” in this thread, acknowledge the shot does not prevent covid infection.


It's relevant in the sense that it destroys the absurd claim that the majority of these excess deaths are because of the vaccine

You aren't very smart. Start thinking more before you ask stupid questions.
Posted by Earnest_P
Member since Aug 2021
5034 posts
Posted on 1/13/23 at 7:49 am to
quote:

It's people who suffer long term effects after COVID infection. While rare it is in fact real and you're a moron if you think it isn't


What’s the pathology?
Posted by Bwmdx
Member since Dec 2018
3296 posts
Posted on 1/13/23 at 7:50 am to
Also, are the risks cumulative to a degree. With each shot is there an increasing elevated risk of sudden death?
Posted by The Levee
Bat Country
Member since Feb 2006
11656 posts
Posted on 1/13/23 at 7:51 am to
quote:

95% effective in preventing Covid. Was that accurate?


For delta yes
Posted by Septiger
Member since Nov 2020
2850 posts
Posted on 1/13/23 at 7:51 am to
Exactly. The sheep will eat that up.
Hook, line and sinker.
Posted by tide06
Member since Oct 2011
19885 posts
Posted on 1/13/23 at 7:55 am to
quote:

And you were just as wrong as they are. I’ll tell you what long-covid is. You remember we used to have people we called hypochondriacs? You notice they are all gone? They are the ones with “long-covid”, which was around before the vaccines started.

I agree with penrod that long Covid is not vaccine related.

I disagree that it had or has anything to do with hypochondria. I would provide as evidence that there were people I know with long Covid symptoms before the vaccine was even available to the public.

I know one who went from being a long distance runner to being unable to hold a five minute conversation without being out of breath.

Seems likely that long Covid is basically a hardening of the pulmonary walls similar to hypertension in the heart due to some immuno response to the infection.

Why it impacted some people and not others and how it can be treated would require extensive clinical research.
This post was edited on 1/13/23 at 8:01 am
Posted by WylieTiger
Member since Nov 2006
14350 posts
Posted on 1/13/23 at 7:59 am to
quote:

Go grab data on R0


Was the viral structure natural or synthetic (Wuhan wet market or Wuhan bio lab across the river)?

If you start here, then you see where we easily get to Ed’s tweet. Everything in between has been a sea of lies and deception.
Posted by Open Your Eyes
Member since Nov 2012
10284 posts
Posted on 1/13/23 at 8:00 am to
quote:

It's relevant in the sense that it destroys the absurd claim that the majority of these excess deaths are because of the vaccine

It does nothing of the sort. Even if what you are regurgitating was true, your argument is now:

- activity 1 increases a person’s chances for bad outcome a
- activity 2 also increases a person’s bad outcome a, and does not prevent activity 1 from occurring
- person should still do activity 2, and activity 2 should not be blamed for increased incidences of bad outcome a

quote:

You aren't very smart.

see above you fricking imbecile

quote:

Start thinking more before you ask stupid questions.

You, a literal bot who’s next original thought will be your first in a very long time, are telling other people to start thinking.

This post was edited on 1/13/23 at 8:02 am
Posted by JKLazurus
Member since Jun 2016
261 posts
Posted on 1/13/23 at 8:03 am to
quote:

No. Car manufacturers made you sign a waiver with no legal recourse should you do become injured while wearing your seatbelt. Member?


To be fair. Those against seatbelts would argue they don’t use them because they heard someone was once decapitated by a seatbelt. Or it’s safer not to wear helmets on a motorcycle because they can remain more aware.

There’s always been a lot of stupid to go around.
Posted by LSUvet72
Member since Sep 2013
13103 posts
Posted on 1/13/23 at 8:03 am to
Gunna blame the vaccine deaths on Trunp by 2024
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
53527 posts
Posted on 1/13/23 at 8:13 am to
quote:

How does one get "long COVID" if they the vaxx works?


So if you took the MRNA juice and never had a confirmed case of COVID19 but dropped dead or had a case of myocarditis, maybe unexplained fibrous blood clots....what then? Would these things be considered MRNA juice long side effects?
Posted by Champagne
Sabine Free State.
Member since Oct 2007
53161 posts
Posted on 1/13/23 at 8:16 am to
Some people still think that the Vax works??

Gullible!

Posted by BengalOnTheBay
Member since Aug 2022
3855 posts
Posted on 1/13/23 at 8:30 am to
quote:

During your time studying biology did they teach you what the word rare meant?


How rare is "rare" for you?

Because for me, it may be something like 1 out of 10,000 to 100,000 patients who would already be at high risk of having a cardiopulmonary event (i.e. preexisting condition of COPD, emphysema, severe heart disease, etc.).
Jump to page
Page First 5 6 7 8 9 ... 16
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 16Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram