- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Where is Judge BoASSberg as Mamdoni signs executive orders?
Posted on 1/2/26 at 3:11 pm
Posted on 1/2/26 at 3:11 pm
Isn’t this judges’ job to declare all executive orders as unconstitutional?
Mamdani’s first executive order reads, "All Executive Orders issued on or after September 26, 2024, and in effect on December 31, 2025, are hereby revoked."
"That was a date that marked a moment when many New Yorkers decided politics held nothing for them," Mamdani said.
Mamdani on Thursday also signed three executive orders regarding New York City's housing crisis. Two of the orders establish task forces to speed up housing developments.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 3:15 pm to GatorOnAnIsland
Task force...aka stealing taxpayer money
This post was edited on 1/2/26 at 3:16 pm
Posted on 1/2/26 at 3:50 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
My god
It's entertaining at least:)
Posted on 1/2/26 at 4:30 pm to GatorOnAnIsland
Why (or how) would a federal district judge in DC be involved in executive orders signed by the mayor of NYC?
This post was edited on 1/2/26 at 4:37 pm
Posted on 1/2/26 at 4:35 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
Why would a federal judge be involved in executive orders signed by the mayor of NYC?
Stop...he's on a roll. Next you're going to tell him that someone with standing actually has to file something challenging the EOs before a judge could do anything.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 5:24 pm to Indefatigable
quote:why would a district court judge in dc be ordering air force planes to turn around in mid air?
Why (or how) would a federal district judge in DC be involved in executive orders signed by the mayor of NYC
This post was edited on 1/2/26 at 5:25 pm
Posted on 1/2/26 at 5:31 pm to GatorOnAnIsland
quote:
Isn’t this judges’ job to declare all executive orders as unconstitutional?
Mamdani’s first executive order reads, "All Executive Orders issued on or after September 26, 2024, and in effect on December 31, 2025, are hereby revoked."
Serious question: are you retarded?
Posted on 1/2/26 at 5:32 pm to GatorOnAnIsland
quote:
Where is Judge BoASSberg as Mamdoni signs executive orders?
They're on the same team.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 5:32 pm to narddogg81
quote:
why would a district court judge in dc be ordering air force planes to turn around in mid air?
The DC Circuit Court has jurisdiction over federal agency action.
The actions around the plane were federal agency actions.
This post was edited on 1/2/26 at 5:33 pm
Posted on 1/2/26 at 5:34 pm to narddogg81
quote:
why would a district court judge in dc be ordering air force planes to turn around in mid air?
Because he is an activist judge with a bad understanding of the Constitution, but at least there was a justiciable case over which he had jurisdiction.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 5:34 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The DC Circuit Court has jurisdiction over federal agency action.
Nah
Posted on 1/2/26 at 5:38 pm to DomincDecoco
quote:
Nah
quote:
Yes, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia (D.C. District Court) has significant jurisdiction over federal agency actions, often sharing or even holding exclusive jurisdiction for reviewing major agency decisions, especially those with national impact, though Congress decides which court gets direct review, sometimes granting it to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals instead. District courts generally handle federal cases, but specific statutes often funnel challenges to agency rules or actions directly to the D.C. Circuit due to its expertise in administrative law and Washington D.C.'s concentration of federal agencies.
Key Points:
General Jurisdiction: The D.C. District Court, like other federal district courts, has original jurisdiction over many federal civil and criminal cases.
Specialized Role: Because many federal agencies are headquartered in D.C., the D.C. District Court (and especially the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals) handles a disproportionate number of administrative law cases.
Congressional Delegation: Congress decides whether challenges to agency actions go to the district court (trial level) or directly to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit (appellate level).
National Significance: Congress often grants exclusive jurisdiction to the D.C. Circuit for actions by independent agencies or matters with national effect, making it a central venue for administrative law.
In short, the D.C. District Court does hear cases involving federal agencies, but many significant agency actions are routed directly to the specialized D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals by federal statute.
Posted on 1/3/26 at 7:20 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Mamdani’s first executive order reads
quote:
Serious question: are you retarded?
No, but I believe you are.
This post was edited on 1/3/26 at 7:22 am
Posted on 1/3/26 at 7:50 am to GatorOnAnIsland
quote:
No, but I believe you are.
No I understand the difference in a state (well, city but that's a part of a state) and the federal government.
The question is why don't you?
Posted on 1/3/26 at 7:53 am to SlowFlowPro
The question was rhetorical you autistic dipshit.
Posted on 1/3/26 at 7:57 am to GatorOnAnIsland
He has local equivalents in NY.
I guess usurpation of Executive power is selective.
The Peoples Court never ruled against Hitler either.
I guess usurpation of Executive power is selective.
The Peoples Court never ruled against Hitler either.
Popular
Back to top


9










