- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 2/10/25 at 7:29 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
Far too often, folks revert to a simplistic set of personal expectations/demands where they want to know all the details and they want it now.
This has nothing to do with expectations, it's just an observation. If you're going to be vague, even if it's a legit reason, then it's meaningless to say that "we were right about ALL of it". It's like throwing a dart at a blank wall then drawing a bullseye around wherever it landed.
Again, I'm thrilled to be seeing this happen but it doesn't convey any credibility to Q.
Posted on 2/10/25 at 8:41 pm to FreedomBarefoot
quote:
I remember the guy/poster that lost the battle to cancer early the Q thread
Ben Coleman
o7
We also lost Dr. Smartass PhD
Posted on 2/10/25 at 8:45 pm to KCT
quote:
A couple of years ago, Jamie Lee Curtis was doing an interview from inside her home. In the background on the wall there was a very bizarre painting. It was a painting of a young girl who was locked in a cage.
That painting went viral, so JLC was forced to address it. She said the painting had been given to her by a friend, and was nothing but an innocent expression of art. But I mean, who in their right mind would want a painting like that?
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 2/10/25 at 8:46 pm to Flats
quote:
Again, I'm thrilled to be seeing this happen but it doesn't convey any credibility to Q.
just all random
Posted on 2/10/25 at 8:50 pm to VoxDawg
weird pics or not, jamie lee curtis was at an event i attended in la years ago and she looked fine, fine fine. 50 yrs old at the time i think - her, not me
my girlfriend shared lipstick with her in the ladies room, said she was very nice
my girlfriend shared lipstick with her in the ladies room, said she was very nice
Posted on 2/10/25 at 8:57 pm to VOR
quote:
How far we have fallen smh… what an embarrassing toad.
This post was edited on 2/10/25 at 9:02 pm
Posted on 2/10/25 at 9:10 pm to VoxDawg
That's the story I was talking about. Incredibly bizarre.
Posted on 2/10/25 at 11:06 pm to RohanGonzales
quote:
just all random
I’m all about objective info. If somebody wants to lay out ALL the Q predictions then it’ll be easy enough to judge the claim I initially responded to. Pointing to current events and claiming that vague statements made 4 years ago were accurate predictions is delusional.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 2:03 am to Flats
quote:
Pointing to current events and claiming that vague statements made 4 years ago were accurate predictions is delusional.
Well yeah
Posted on 2/11/25 at 6:54 am to beaux duke
And?
Lucifer himself can still masquerade as an angel of light and quote scripture better than any of us.
Lucifer himself can still masquerade as an angel of light and quote scripture better than any of us.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 6:55 am to bamarep
How many times was USAID specifically referenced in the Q thread?
Posted on 2/11/25 at 6:55 am to Flats
quote:
Pointing to current events and claiming that vague statements made 4 years ago were accurate predictions is delusional.
Correct.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 7:01 am to Flats
Again, fricked up premise -> fricked up conclusions.
That wasn't the purpose of the Q posts, so you're off the starting line and veered straight into a ditch.
quote:
If somebody wants to lay out ALL the Q predictions
That wasn't the purpose of the Q posts, so you're off the starting line and veered straight into a ditch.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 7:07 am to Flats
quote:
If you're going to be vague, even if it's a legit reason, then it's meaningless to say that "we were right about ALL of it"
Spoiler Alert: Bamarep isn't Q.
Hyperbolic statements by someone who was a regular participant in the ToE is not the same as saying that "aLL oF q'S pReDiCtIoNs cAmE tRuE".
Again, on a continuum where the two extremes are Q Was Right About Everything and Q Was Totally Wrong About Everything, we're MUCH closer to the "Correct" end than the other.
Sorry that makes you sad.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 7:12 am to RohanGonzales
quote:
I wonder if the autists have figured out how to reach into Hell?
We torment his bog witch daughter in his stead.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 7:13 am to VoxDawg
quote:
That wasn't the purpose of the Q posts,
Posted in a thread titled
quote:
What's up MFERS? Can we all finally admit that we were right about ALL of it?
and you posted
quote:
On a continuum where Q was completely correct about every single thing they typed, and on the other end of the spectrum Q missed on 100% of the substance they chose to speak on... In 2025, we are infinitely closer to the Q Was Right end.
Cope and seethe accordingly.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 7:14 am to VoxDawg
quote:
Again, on a continuum where the two extremes are Q Was Right About Everything and Q Was Totally Wrong About Everything, we're MUCH closer to the "Correct" end than the other.
Sorry that makes you sad.
Q didn't say anything to be correct about anything.
Posting intentionally vague crap isn't actually saying anything of substance that can be validated.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 7:23 am to Flats
Q used to make predictions and when they didn't come to fruition the posting style changed to cryptic foolishness for bored people trying to find meaning in their lives to "research."
Then when things didn't come to pass, that was labeled purposeful misinformation.
It has all the hallmarks of delusion. The responses in support of Q in this thread are demonstrations of such.
Then when things didn't come to pass, that was labeled purposeful misinformation.
It has all the hallmarks of delusion. The responses in support of Q in this thread are demonstrations of such.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 7:24 am to VoxDawg
quote:
Again, on a continuum where the two extremes are Q Was Right About Everything and Q Was Totally Wrong About Everything, we're MUCH closer to the "Correct" end than the other.
But there's no definition of "right" because everything is vague bullshite, and on the rare occasion where specifics were offered they never materialized. This is Nostradamus-style mental masturbation.
Page 5 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News