- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What is the logic behind this deportation? What is the purpose?
Posted on 6/25/25 at 3:12 pm to 4cubbies
Posted on 6/25/25 at 3:12 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
What is the logic behind this deportation? What is the purpose?
I'll play. Name a country in the World where you are considered a legal citizen of that country if you reside there illegally.
Posted on 6/25/25 at 3:12 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
What is the logic behind this deportation? What is the purpose?
quote:
Trump's quotas
Posted on 6/25/25 at 3:12 pm to jchamil
quote:
The woman clearly wasn't hiding if she made all her court dates.
According to her husband
The same husband who wasn't insisting she get a green card when they got married 37 years ago.
Posted on 6/25/25 at 3:13 pm to 4cubbies
What's up with that SS card?
Stolen? False info? Forgery?
Have militants and shady characters come through her house? Did she break the law?
Stolen? False info? Forgery?
Have militants and shady characters come through her house? Did she break the law?
Posted on 6/25/25 at 3:14 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
for what I consider to be petty reasons.
Posted on 6/25/25 at 3:14 pm to Decatur
quote:
Decatur
12 million deported under Clinton
8 million deported under Obama
4 million deported under Biden.
200k deported under Trump.
Decatur, why is 200,000 worse than 24 million deported under Democrats?
Posted on 6/25/25 at 3:15 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
Based on the information provided, this woman was not a drain on taxpayers before she was detained. Now she is.
Suddenly very focused on fiscal prudence, are we?
Again, minimal justification should be needed to send non-citizens home. We're under no obligation to endure a cost-benefit test to send non-Americans back.
That is essentially the game the left has set up for us to play - "we let in these people and then when you try to undo our destruction we'll talk about the amount of resource it requires to undo our efforts!"
Posted on 6/25/25 at 3:16 pm to 4cubbies
I have sympathy for some cub, but dont be this obtuse
Posted on 6/25/25 at 3:17 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
Does she have a legal status to live in the United States?
quote:
No
There's your answer.
It's not petty to uphold the laws of this country. And it's certainly not stupid at least to those of us smart enough to know laws are a very important function of a civil society.
Posted on 6/25/25 at 3:18 pm to MemphisGuy
quote:
If anything, that should have easily qualified her for it. It did thousands of other Iranians from that time frame.
Again, I'm not an expert but from Googling, a possible explanation could be that The Refugee Act of 1980 had not be codified at the time, although I'm not sure the year her student visa expired.
Or she couldn't prove persecution and therefore didn't qualify for asylum.
Posted on 6/25/25 at 3:18 pm to BugAC
quote:
The woman clearly wasn't hiding if she made all her court dates.
According to her husband
The same husband who wasn't insisting she get a green card when they got married 37 years ago.
Like I said, there may very well be more to the story.
Some of us were young adults and remember when the embassy in Iran was seized and the hostages were taken. Someone whose parents worked for the Shah would likely have had the golden ticket, Something seems fishy about the whole story.
Posted on 6/25/25 at 3:18 pm to Chancellor
quote:
“No one is above the law.”
/thread
Posted on 6/25/25 at 3:19 pm to LegendInMyMind
quote:
I think some of these cases just invite needless criticism and do more harm to the overall agenda than good.
I get the sentiment, but this is largely because we're playing on their terms.
Again, the same people who will tell us it's too expensive to send sweet little Persian ladies back to Iran will tell us we should hire 100,000 people to parse through the 10s of millions of illegal immigrants who've entered/been allowed to stay because of intentional actions of D-led administrations.
It's a farce, and we should completely ignore their sob stories and wait 5 minutes until the mushy part of the American populace moves on to the next thing.
Posted on 6/25/25 at 3:20 pm to 4cubbies
Sounds like her issue is with the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, not Trump!.
Why are you hanging this on Trump!?
Why are you hanging this on Trump!?
Posted on 6/25/25 at 3:21 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
a possible explanation could be that The Refugee Act of 1980 had not be codified at the time
It's 2025. She's had 45 years to get that amended.
quote:
Or she couldn't prove persecution and therefore didn't qualify for asylum.
Married in 1988. She had a 2nd avenue to get a green card and for some reason didn't do it. Why? I'm not expecting you to know the answer. What you should do is maybe not defend so furiously this nola.com article that is clearly leaving a lot out.
Also, as someone else said, she hasn't been deported yet. She may not be deported after all said and done, we don't know. But, the reason she has been detained is 100% because Biden let in 10,000+ illegal Iranians that have not been vetted. Don't get mad a Trump for being the disciplinarian and not the "cool mom" like uncle Joe.
Posted on 6/25/25 at 3:23 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
Suddenly very focused on fiscal prudence, are we?
The arguments in favor of mass deportations generally include "illegals" being a drain on taxpayers.
quote:I am not arguing that the government does not have the right to deport this woman. It does not seem to be in the USA's best interest to deport her, however.
Again, minimal justification should be needed to send non-citizens home
Posted on 6/25/25 at 3:25 pm to Snipe
quote:
Does she have a legal status to live in the United States?
quote:
No
There's your answer.
It's not petty to uphold the laws of this country. And it's certainly not stupid at least to those of us smart enough to know laws are a very important function of a civil society
I agree with you 1,000%.
I also agree with the poster who said he'd like to see all the violent criminals, gang bangers, drug dealers, etc, go first.
It is possible for one to believe that the woman should be deported, but also believe that a community would be safer if those others I mentioned went first.
Posted on 6/25/25 at 3:26 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
I am not arguing that the government does not have the right to deport this woman. It does not seem to be in the USA's best interest to deport her, however.
You have no clue what has gone on with this woman and are taking everything in this article as if it’s gospel. The fact that she’s been here for 50 years, been married during that time, and is still not a legal citizen should tell you there’s a lot more to this story.
I honestly can’t tell if you’re too dense to get that or just pushing some false narrative. At least after 5 pages you backed off her being deported and admitted you lied about that.
Popular
Back to top


0








