Started By
Message

re: What is the logic behind this deportation? What is the purpose?

Posted on 6/26/25 at 4:44 pm to
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
55787 posts
Posted on 6/26/25 at 4:44 pm to
quote:

so the government let her stay which they’re allowed to do.


Yep. And then removed the stay. Which they’re allowed to do.
Posted by CheniereTiger108
Member since Jul 2014
1658 posts
Posted on 6/26/25 at 5:07 pm to
Wellll tough. It’s not like Trump in particular hasn’t been saying what he was gonna do for 10 years. Just because she got lucky thr first term, doesn’t mean her time wouldn’t run out this time. Not to mention she’s in a “sanctuary city” - which is obviously gonna be somewhere they focus a lot of attention from the jump.. and of course all Iranians are going to draw extra attention at this point

Posted by CleverUserName
Member since Oct 2016
15949 posts
Posted on 6/26/25 at 5:58 pm to
quote:

She’s part of the fabric of her neighborhood. WTF is wrong with some of you? You actually want to be the exaggerated villains of a bleeding heart movie?


Oh wow. You know… I also remember you bleeding all over the board when elderly people with no records were being rounded up by the FBI for J6.

I remember you bleeding all over the board also for people being arrested for religious gatherings during the asinine Covid lockdowns. While rioting was allowed.

I remember you bleeding all over the board when first term Trump allies were being raided by the FBI in the early morning and being marched out barely clothed in front of media that was tipped it would happen.

OH WAIT!!! We didn’t see that did we??

AGAIN.. not funny when the rabbit has the gun isn’t it?? It was fun fun fun fun fun for 4 years. The ball got rolling. Don’t get mad when someone takes it and begins rolling it.

You folks better start hammering the left when they start shite that’s political theater and political revenge. You have a mayoral candidate in NY right now who has said he would arrest a foreign leader. You can start there.
Posted by CleverUserName
Member since Oct 2016
15949 posts
Posted on 6/26/25 at 6:13 pm to
quote:

From just a few posts prior -


Nice job. That quote was in response to the bolded part of that quote…… that you completely ignored.
Posted by Auburn80
Backwater, TN
Member since Nov 2017
9587 posts
Posted on 6/26/25 at 6:18 pm to
I disagree with this one also. This is not one of Biden’s problem children.
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
58467 posts
Posted on 6/26/25 at 6:24 pm to
quote:

Yep. And then removed the stay. Which they’re allowed to do.


The government is also allowed to waste taxpayer dollars. That doesn’t mean it makes sense or benefits anyone in any way.
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
58467 posts
Posted on 6/26/25 at 6:31 pm to
quote:

Your mind is so twisted and incapable of operation without allowing your emotions to take over ,


Why is it that old men want to call a younger woman emotional but can never provide any evidence of me being emotional outside of their own feelings?

When you have to launch emotional personal attacks to win a debate, you’ve already lost.

quote:

I said this 20 something pages ago, your political party(Marxist Dems)



Oh look, another emotionally driven personal attack based on your feelings and no actual evidence.

quote:

Do you have children????
When you fuss at em over and over, until you finally have enough and theres no more negotiation.


Are you claiming the government fussed at this woman over and over when it repeatedly told her she could stay in the country?
Posted by Oates Mustache
Member since Oct 2011
25771 posts
Posted on 6/26/25 at 6:33 pm to
quote:

She hid like a rat instead of going home when her visa was up


She didn't though. She was allowed to stay here by our government, applied for and somehow got a driver's license and SS card. That's about as out in the open as you can be as someone in her position.

Like others said, they really need to start with all the violent assholes then move to the more recent ones.

People like this, crime free, long term, etc should at least be given options to stay and become a citizen.

The optics of this story are bad.

And F you for making me reply in a 4cubbies thread.
This post was edited on 6/26/25 at 6:35 pm
Posted by HouseMom
Member since Jun 2020
1701 posts
Posted on 6/26/25 at 6:56 pm to
quote:

She tried to apply for a green card under a program for spouses of U.S. citizens, but was rejected due to a previous marriage she had in the 1980s that officials had deemed fraudulent, her daughter said.


This seems like a pretty important part. They should have deported her after the fraudulent marriage and never followed up.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
55787 posts
Posted on 6/26/25 at 6:59 pm to
quote:

The optics of this story are bad.


Optics? Yeah…the media would act differently towards Trump if not for the bad optics.
Posted by narddogg81
Vancouver
Member since Jan 2012
21811 posts
Posted on 6/26/25 at 7:00 pm to
quote:

This seems like a pretty important part. They should have deported her after the fraudulent marriage and never followed up.
bingo. She disqualified herself in the past with a fake marriage for immigration fraud purposes. Should have been kicked out then. She got decades here she shouldn't have had, I feel no sympathy and I hope they get all these similar cases of people who gamed the system
Posted by HouseMom
Member since Jun 2020
1701 posts
Posted on 6/26/25 at 7:06 pm to
Yeah. I'm not sure some on here read the entire article. Basically, her student visa expired, they denied her asylum, she panicked and tried to marry a random for a green card, and the feds said no bueno.

This is why she can't have a green card with her current husband and likely why she isn't allowed to be a citizen.
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
58467 posts
Posted on 6/26/25 at 7:12 pm to
That’s exactly why she can’t become a citizen. I cited the immigration law permanently forbidding citizenship to someone who participates in a marriage the government deems fraudulent a few pages ago.
Posted by SpartanSoul
Member since Aug 2016
2539 posts
Posted on 6/26/25 at 7:15 pm to
quote:


That’s exactly why she can’t become a citizen. I cited the immigration law permanently forbidding citizenship to someone who participates in a marriage the government deems fraudulent a few pages ago.


I like how you phrase it like the gov arbitrarily deemed it a sham. She admitted it.
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
77963 posts
Posted on 6/26/25 at 7:16 pm to
quote:

Yep. And then removed the stay. Which they’re allowed to do.


ok so if the government after a legal proceeding allows you to stay… you’re here…

but again, why deport her now?
Posted by Sofaking2
Member since Apr 2023
18389 posts
Posted on 6/26/25 at 7:26 pm to
quote:

Under the leadership of Kamala Harris’s running mate, Gov. Tim Walz (D), Minnesota’s laws regarding the care of born-alive infants have been repealed or re-written with vague language that no longer explicitly includes such a requirement. Member of the press simply haven’t bothered to check their facts. “[T]he statute that [Walz] signed into law,” Vance said during the Oct. 1 vice presidential debate, “it says that a doctor who presides over an abortion, where the baby survives, the doctor is under no obligation to provide lifesaving care to a baby who survives a botched late-term abortion.”

The Hill “JD Vance was right about Minnesota’s abortion laws”
It makes more sense than allowing babies born to die without medical care just because you are a Democrat. This lady isn’t here legally. She was allowed to stay at the discretion of our government, but she isn’t anymore. She isn’t being left to die like an animal like what’s happened in Minnesota over the last few years to babies who have survived botched abortions. Fix this murder and we can talk.
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
58467 posts
Posted on 6/26/25 at 7:28 pm to
quote:

She admitted it.


Oh, can you link your source for that? I’m invested in her story now.
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
58467 posts
Posted on 6/26/25 at 7:32 pm to
quote:

It makes more sense than allowing babies born to die without medical care just because you are a Democrat. This lady isn’t here legally. She was allowed to stay at the discretion of our government, but she isn’t anymore. She isn’t being left to die like an animal like what’s happened in Minnesota over the last few years to babies who have survived botched abortions. Fix this murder and we can talk.


Abortion is against the law in the state this woman lives in. I haven’t seen anyone claim she sought any abortions. Not sure of the relevance here.

I would also love to see poverty and homelessness eradicated but deporting this woman won’t do anything to further those goals. It would likely create a new homeless person since I doubt this woman has anywhere to stay in Iran or wherever else the government will send her.
Posted by SpartanSoul
Member since Aug 2016
2539 posts
Posted on 6/26/25 at 8:08 pm to
quote:

Oh, can you link your source for that? I’m invested in her story now.



Lightening posted it pages ago.

https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/238/371/515357/

Note 4 at the bottom


quote:

Milne was divorced from the nonimmigrant student she married prior to 1983. She then married a U.S. citizen but we found, in our above-said unpublished opinion, that she had admitted that it was a marriage of convenience. After another divorce, she married her current husband, a marriage that is uncontested as "bona fide." Her request for legal permanent resident status based on this marriage was denied under INA § 204(c) which precludes approval based on even an admittedly good-faith union if the petitioner had previously contracted an improper marriage.




You can read it all and see how she changed her story and was basically throwing shite at the wall to see if something stuck.

Yes, the 50yrs is pathetic on the gov, but she was given due process and should have been sent home long ago.

As stated by many posters before, given the circumstances at the time if there was any reason to have given asylum to her it would have been. That she wasn't given asylum speaks volumes.
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
58467 posts
Posted on 6/27/25 at 9:54 am to
quote:

As stated by many posters before, given the circumstances at the time if there was any reason to have given asylum to her it would have been. That she wasn't given asylum speaks volumes.



She came to the US on a student visa in 1978. Presumably it was a 4 year visa. She overstayed it, then applied for asylum. I don't know the year she applied for asylum but let's just say it was 1985.

According to the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) in Washington, 3,216 Iranian asylum cases were denied in 1985. This is in comparison to 5,017 cases that were granted asylum and 3,213 cases that were still under consideration.

28% of Iranian asylum seekers were denied in 1985. 44% were approved and 28% were left "under consideration." It doesn't seem that remarkable that she was one of the 3,216 asylum seekers that was denied asylum.

If she was a threat to the US, the court would not have told her she can stay in the country legally for 47 years.

ETA: from the link you posted:

quote:

Eventually, an immigration judge (IJ) denied Milne's request for asylum, ruling, inter alia, that she failed to demonstrate that she would suffer extreme hardship if deported.
This post was edited on 6/27/25 at 9:57 am
first pageprev pagePage 25 of 26Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram