- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What If the Federal Judge Sides with Newsom?
Posted on 6/9/25 at 9:04 pm to TooFyeToFly
Posted on 6/9/25 at 9:04 pm to TooFyeToFly
quote:you need to take a reading comprehension refresher
Like when the Supreme Court blocked Biden's student loan forgiveness program.
You clearly need a civics refresher, like a lot of Americans.
Posted on 6/9/25 at 9:07 pm to faraway
Deputize the roof top Koreans.
Posted on 6/9/25 at 9:42 pm to TigerHornII
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/11/25 at 6:00 pm
Posted on 6/9/25 at 9:48 pm to TooFyeToFly
quote:That also wasn’t about being the commander in chief, and anyway Biden’s autopen went around it until after the election.quote:
No judge has the authority to stop the President from doing the duties as Commander in Chief
Yes, they absolutely do and always have. Like when the Supreme Court blocked Biden's student loan forgiveness program.
quote:Where does the constitution explicitly grant the Supremes who are appointed for life the judicial power to decide the constitutionality of a law or actions over the executive and legislative branches?
You clearly need a civics refresher, like a lot of Americans.
That kind of centralized and absolute power given to unelected positions with life terms seems to be the exact opposite of the ideals our country was formed in the first place and at the time the constitution written and ratified. Surely they would have spelled out limits, specific requirements in order for Supremes to overturn like was done with Congress overturning a veto, and added controls over this kind of power like nullification and limited terms of their service if it was meant to be as the Supremes themselves say it is. Our founding fathers did not want to create the Supreme Oligarchy.
Posted on 6/9/25 at 9:54 pm to Clark14
quote:
That didn’t happen dumbass or maybe some life and injuries would have been prevented.
Nancy told Trump no and that she didn’t require anything but her capital police.
Can you imagine the Dem outcry if Trump had federalized national guard to help guard the Capital the day the election was to be certified without the speaker’s consent and approval??
Bigger question is why didn’t Nancy want the extra help?
Posted on 6/9/25 at 9:59 pm to MISSOURI WALTZ
quote:
Does Trump finally tell a judge to kick rocks and leave the Guard in L.A.?
Without question.
His authority is clear here.
Posted on 6/9/25 at 10:27 pm to dallastigers
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/11/25 at 6:01 pm
Posted on 6/9/25 at 10:31 pm to JohnnyKilroy
This post and its upvote/downvote ratio are just bait for Johnny to later make loose accusations and paint with broad strokes.
This post was edited on 6/10/25 at 6:34 am
Posted on 6/9/25 at 11:27 pm to MISSOURI WALTZ
I think that the President should send one US Marshal out with an order to disperse.
When the marshal is ignored, the military is assigned to serve the marshals. This goes back to George Washington and is an important protection.
See also the US Coast Guard and US Navy for a similar process.
Tie all military action to our civilian agency.
When the marshal is ignored, the military is assigned to serve the marshals. This goes back to George Washington and is an important protection.
See also the US Coast Guard and US Navy for a similar process.
Tie all military action to our civilian agency.
Posted on 6/9/25 at 11:43 pm to Clark14
quote:
You people are so brain dead it’s pathetic, go back to your same think tank poli board and wallow in your miserable life.
Ad hominem and “facts” you were told to believe by your masters are all you and your ilk ever have.
Posted on 6/10/25 at 2:30 am to TooFyeToFly
Really dude it amazes me how stupid ya'll are
Posted on 6/10/25 at 5:28 am to holdmuh keystonelite
quote:
Federal judges have stopped him from doing many things so far and Trump just takes it like a bitch. Wish he would say frick those federal judges but he won't.
There's one thing you cucks in the cult have made clear - y'all would rather a king than a president. Quite a shame, if we're all being honest here.
Posted on 6/10/25 at 5:45 am to MISSOURI WALTZ
The 9th Circuit will almost certainly side with Newsom !!!!
Posted on 6/10/25 at 5:53 am to MISSOURI WALTZ
Trump doesn't GAF. What's the Judge gonna do, call out the National Guard to stop Trump if he refuses? LOL
Posted on 6/10/25 at 6:31 am to Clark14
How long have you been retarded?
Posted on 6/10/25 at 6:35 am to MISSOURI WALTZ
JFK didn't ask permission to send the Alabama National Guard to Tuscaloosa when Governor George Wallace stood in the doorway.
Posted on 6/10/25 at 6:59 am to Clark14
quote:
That didn’t happen dumbass or maybe some life and injuries would have been prevented. Btw, have you hanged Mike pence yet? You had the gallows set up for it. You and your ilk are brainwashed morons and treasonous bastards, frick you. And I posted this this with calmness and all due respect, which is none.
Holy shite you are one unhinged MFer.
I hope you don't have access to kids.
Posted on 6/10/25 at 7:19 am to Clark14
quote:
Remember when the guard was sent to Kent state? That really worked out well didn’t it. A republican governor did that.
We are on the verge of an identical situation and the majority of the country is not going to be ok with it when it does just like they weren't when it happened at Kent State. No one should be OK with federal troops policing US citizens for any reason.
Also I can't imagine how anyone thought deporting 15-20 million people....their number, not mine...would go smoothly. Right, wrong or indifferent deporting 1 million people is always going to involve a pile of civil unrest UNLESS you are willing to brutalize citizens protesting the action as well as those you are deporting. This is the United States and we are talking about Americans when we are talking about the citizens protesting....Americans are not as willing to be bullied by the federal government as citizens of other nations have proven to be in the past...it is going to require violence on the part of the state and most of us do not have the stomach for the state committing such violence. I get it that big tough macho man loves the idea of children and senior citizens being punched in the mouth by state agents but the majority or Americans are going to eventually have a belly full of it and public opinion is very motivating for politicians, especially those who are interested in being president in 4 years. I know that a small number of Americans love the idea of the state treating anyone they do not like brutally but eventually the majority of Americans will grow sick of it....the support for the national guard at Kent State was almost overwhelming in the moment, withing a few weeks the tide turned seriously because Americans can't and will not tolerate the federal government over stepping.
Posted on 6/10/25 at 7:41 am to AwgustaDawg
Let me respond to your 1k word drivel essay with a long, but figures based response, that isn’t hyperbolic nonsense.
Here are a few recent polls (I’ll add links later):
Pew Research Center: 32% of U.S. adults say all immigrants living in the country illegally should be deported.
Axios/Ipsos: 66% of Americans support deporting undocumented immigrants in general (including 93% of Republicans, 43% of Democrats, 67% of independents).
Economist/YouGov: Between 52% and 58% of (likely) voters support “mass deportation of undocumented immigrants” compared with 37–43% who oppose it
So in general, a lot of Americans support the deportation of undocumented illegal immigrants. This isn’t a hand few of people wanting them deported as you may be trying to suggest.
Now let’s answer the next question: Why?
fairus.org: The Financial Burden of Illegal Immigration
since I doubt you’ll take the time to open the link, I’ll borrow the figures fairus.org uses to summarize:
Total Government Expenditures on Illegal Aliens:
Total Federal Expenditures: $66,449,136,000
+ Total State Expenditures: $115,608,730,000
= $182,057,865,000
Total Tax Contributions from Illegal Aliens:
Total Federal Taxes Paid: $16,219,495,000
+ Total State Taxes Paid: $15,172,140,000
= $31,391,635,000
So, Total Tax Burden of Illegal Aliens:
$182,057,865, 000 total expenditures on illegal aliens
- $31,391,635,000 total tax contributions from illegal aliens
= $150,666,230,000
$150 billion dollars in 2023.
Now, explain to me how illegal immigrants are a net positive for our economy. What do they contribute that offsets $150 billion?
And that’s 2023. We let in another 3-5 million illegal aliens in 2024. This problem will only continue to snowball. And that’s just the economics. Seriously, consider what you are saddling the next generations of Americans with by just throwing your hands up, and saying, “our blueberry prices and sheetrock installation are gonna skyrocket”. Or, it’s mean! It’s a lazy and ignorant argument proving you either have an ulterior motive to support illegal immigration or you’re brainwashed.
Not to mention the impact on our medical industry, impact on housing availability, impact on public schools, etc. Not to mention the vast vast majority of these people despise us, our culture, and our history.(we see it in real time at these protests) They have no intention to integrate into our society. They are here for handouts. And they have to go! One way or another, get them out.
Here are a few recent polls (I’ll add links later):
Pew Research Center: 32% of U.S. adults say all immigrants living in the country illegally should be deported.
Axios/Ipsos: 66% of Americans support deporting undocumented immigrants in general (including 93% of Republicans, 43% of Democrats, 67% of independents).
Economist/YouGov: Between 52% and 58% of (likely) voters support “mass deportation of undocumented immigrants” compared with 37–43% who oppose it
So in general, a lot of Americans support the deportation of undocumented illegal immigrants. This isn’t a hand few of people wanting them deported as you may be trying to suggest.
Now let’s answer the next question: Why?
fairus.org: The Financial Burden of Illegal Immigration
since I doubt you’ll take the time to open the link, I’ll borrow the figures fairus.org uses to summarize:
Total Government Expenditures on Illegal Aliens:
Total Federal Expenditures: $66,449,136,000
+ Total State Expenditures: $115,608,730,000
= $182,057,865,000
Total Tax Contributions from Illegal Aliens:
Total Federal Taxes Paid: $16,219,495,000
+ Total State Taxes Paid: $15,172,140,000
= $31,391,635,000
So, Total Tax Burden of Illegal Aliens:
$182,057,865, 000 total expenditures on illegal aliens
- $31,391,635,000 total tax contributions from illegal aliens
= $150,666,230,000
$150 billion dollars in 2023.
Now, explain to me how illegal immigrants are a net positive for our economy. What do they contribute that offsets $150 billion?
And that’s 2023. We let in another 3-5 million illegal aliens in 2024. This problem will only continue to snowball. And that’s just the economics. Seriously, consider what you are saddling the next generations of Americans with by just throwing your hands up, and saying, “our blueberry prices and sheetrock installation are gonna skyrocket”. Or, it’s mean! It’s a lazy and ignorant argument proving you either have an ulterior motive to support illegal immigration or you’re brainwashed.
Not to mention the impact on our medical industry, impact on housing availability, impact on public schools, etc. Not to mention the vast vast majority of these people despise us, our culture, and our history.(we see it in real time at these protests) They have no intention to integrate into our society. They are here for handouts. And they have to go! One way or another, get them out.
This post was edited on 6/10/25 at 8:00 am
Posted on 6/10/25 at 7:51 am to Clark14
quote:
And there are 3 branches of government, legislative, judicial and and frickstick. 2 are in place to keep frickstick in check and prevent a damn dictatorship and such bullshite
Coach Tommy T doesn’t agree with your three branches.
Popular
Back to top
