- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What gun restrictions would you tolerate?
Posted on 5/26/22 at 6:44 am to Eli Goldfinger
Posted on 5/26/22 at 6:44 am to Eli Goldfinger
FFLs already perform background checks on all firearm purchases (even "gun shows" and online purchases).
That's as "regulated" as it should be.
That's as "regulated" as it should be.
0
Posted on 5/26/22 at 6:48 am to civiltiger07
quote:
gun registry
I don't even think you should have to register your vehicle, so frick, HELL NO on a gun registry.
This post was edited on 5/26/22 at 6:49 am
Posted on 5/26/22 at 6:48 am to Eli Goldfinger
None, they don’t work and only restrict legal gun owners. Plus, we all know that these rabid maniacs won’t stop or be satisfied with some restrictions. Remember when it was “just a statue” being removed? In five years the Dems would want us to be like Australia. How did that work out for the Aussies during Covid when they had given up their guns?
Posted on 5/26/22 at 6:51 am to Eli Goldfinger
I would be in favor of confiscating all hunting rifles and the handguns of hunters.
Posted on 5/26/22 at 6:53 am to Philzilla2k
Lol
Posted on 5/26/22 at 6:54 am to Eli Goldfinger
Common sense gun laws that specifically remove guns from the people who murder with guns. Sounds simple right? Not racist?
Posted on 5/26/22 at 6:56 am to Philzilla2k
quote:
I would be in favor of confiscating all hunting rifles and the handguns of hunters.
Just as long as somebody else does the confiscating? And not YOU? Am I right?
Posted on 5/26/22 at 6:59 am to Gideon Swashbuckler
quote:
Just as long as somebody else does the confiscating? And not YOU? Am I right?
No, I’d do it, I’ll just bring my AR.
Posted on 5/26/22 at 6:59 am to Philzilla2k
quote:
I would be in favor of confiscating all hunting rifles and the handguns of hunters.
Why? They aren't committing mass killings of people.
Posted on 5/26/22 at 6:59 am to Philzilla2k
quote:
No, I’d do it, I’ll just bring my AR.
Oh, I see. You must not be a hunter.
Expect fierce resistance.
This post was edited on 5/26/22 at 7:00 am
Posted on 5/26/22 at 7:08 am to DawgRebelinAL
quote:Fine, then raise the age to join the military. If 18 year olds aren’t mature enough to buy a rifle or a case of beer, then they aren’t mature enough to sign up for a 6 year committment where they can potentially be shipped off to fight on the front lines of a war zone.
1. Raise the minimum age to 21 for rifles. Sorry idiots, but 18 doesn't mean what it used to mean.
quote:Or judges can just hand down stiffer sentences on the charges based on existing laws. What good are more laws if a judge lets the perp off with a slap on the wrist anyway or activist DA’s don’t prosecute? Democrats fight back on mandatory minimum sentences because its their base getting caught with stolen guns or in possession of firearms with drugs
a slight nuisance for the law abiding but throws an additional charge for a future perp involved in a gun crime.
Posted on 5/26/22 at 7:08 am to Eli Goldfinger
None . I think republicans in congress should draft a bill that you have to be 21 to own a gun or vote unless your in the military. Democrats would vote it down and show they don’t really care . Even a bill making all parents also be responsible for their children’s gun crimes . Democrats would shot it down too.
Posted on 5/26/22 at 7:11 am to Gideon Swashbuckler
Y’all are idiots, did you even read the first post? It was a joke, directly addressing the OP.
Posted on 5/26/22 at 7:12 am to Eli Goldfinger
None. I would tolerate a discussion on new gun laws when the ones on the books are strictly enforced for a decade.
Posted on 5/26/22 at 7:18 am to Eli Goldfinger
The one that disarmed Capital Police and armed Congress
Posted on 5/26/22 at 7:18 am to DawgRebelinAL
quote:
Raise the minimum age to 21 for rifles. Sorry idiots, but 18 doesn't mean what it used to mean.
Are you willing to raise the voting age to 21 as well? What about the age to serve in the military.
My now 22 year old son was serving before he was 21 does that mean he should have been able to man a 6,000 round a minute weapon in his helicopter but not have a rifle for hunting?
quote:
Expand background checks for private sales so that both parties must pass it.
How many legally transacted private sales (where the gun isn’t stolen to begin with for example) result in a shooting?
How about we begin with strict enforcement of the laws already on the books instead of taking rights away from law abiding people?
Posted on 5/26/22 at 7:22 am to Eli Goldfinger
even here we see that anti-gunners success in dividing "hunters" and "assault rifle" users...
Let's be clear, in the end they want to restrict, register and eventually ban all privately-owned firearms. (outside their own security details of course)
Let's be clear, in the end they want to restrict, register and eventually ban all privately-owned firearms. (outside their own security details of course)
Posted on 5/26/22 at 7:23 am to Tiger Prawn
quote:
quote:
1. Raise the minimum age to 21 for rifles. Sorry idiots, but 18 doesn't mean what it used to mean.
Fine, then raise the age to join the military. If 18 year olds aren’t mature enough to buy a rifle or a case of beer, then they aren’t mature enough to sign up for a 6 year committment where they can potentially be shipped off to fight on the front lines of a war zone
Or a student loan
Posted on 5/26/22 at 7:27 am to Eli Goldfinger
quote:
What gun restrictions would you tolerate?
You mean beyond what we are already tolerating?
Posted on 5/26/22 at 7:27 am to Eli Goldfinger
0
No commonly pitched restrictions would have stopped this shooter or any others.
Stop wanting to piss away our ONE true power over potential tyranny.
Only a full firearms mandatory confiscation would stop these shooters.
No commonly pitched restrictions would have stopped this shooter or any others.
Stop wanting to piss away our ONE true power over potential tyranny.
Only a full firearms mandatory confiscation would stop these shooters.
Page 4 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News