- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What are Mary Fanning’s credentials and where did she get her data?
Posted on 2/15/21 at 1:55 pm to LarryK
Posted on 2/15/21 at 1:55 pm to LarryK
So you’re saying data can’t be manipulated with predetermined formulas or after the fact manually?
That states couldn’t have run fake ballots through machine tabulators, or run ballot groups through multiple times?
That states couldn’t destroy evidence in the 3 months since the election?
That election laws weren’t illegally manipulated in Pennsylvania to allow late or faulty ballots to be counted?
That Secretaries of State, governors and the like can’t be compromised to say they audited the vote when they actually just recounted the false count?
That the democrats were lying about the possibility of this type of fraud in the 2016 election when Trump won?
That states couldn’t have run fake ballots through machine tabulators, or run ballot groups through multiple times?
That states couldn’t destroy evidence in the 3 months since the election?
That election laws weren’t illegally manipulated in Pennsylvania to allow late or faulty ballots to be counted?
That Secretaries of State, governors and the like can’t be compromised to say they audited the vote when they actually just recounted the false count?
That the democrats were lying about the possibility of this type of fraud in the 2016 election when Trump won?
1
Posted on 2/15/21 at 2:28 pm to LarryK
quote:
Number of Posts: 1
Registered on: 2/15/2021
quote:
GET IT???
I believe so...
This post was edited on 2/15/21 at 2:31 pm
Posted on 2/15/21 at 2:42 pm to Wednesday
The spreadsheets she was using came from a super nerds video.
I can't find it again, but it was the same deal she just referenced. He said he posted the raw data for others to verify. He was some excel genius who started pulling the raw data.
Edit: found it
Edit 2: more on this topic
I can't find it again, but it was the same deal she just referenced. He said he posted the raw data for others to verify. He was some excel genius who started pulling the raw data.
Edit: found it
Edit 2: more on this topic
This post was edited on 2/15/21 at 2:44 pm
Posted on 2/15/21 at 3:21 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:
I believe so...
Is it still trolling if the points made are factual?
Posted on 2/15/21 at 4:24 pm to Wednesday
Mary Fanning is not her real name. She is very protective of her privacy, justifiably so because her connections are deep military brass, military intelligence. She must protect her anonymity for security reasons. She is very well connected, and you can trust her reportage. It comes from impeccable sources. I know. I've worked with her.
Posted on 2/15/21 at 4:33 pm to AndyCBR
Actually, I stumbled across this forum hoping to answer the same question LSU fan asked: What are Mary Fanning's credentials and where did she get her data? The ONLY thing I have been able to come up with is her numerous articles to a website that any reasonable person would have to regard as grossly suspect as to its credibility.
She would have us believe that she or her sources had the capability of tracking, in real time, the traffic of thousands of individual international IP addresses. And while she will release that information to Mike Lindell for public release, she will not release it in its totality for others to analyze or identify where it came from, or if it is classified by a government agency, etc.
Yeah, that makes me suspicious. But if you buy it with no further questions, that's your business. If you ever find out anything differently, please let me know.
She would have us believe that she or her sources had the capability of tracking, in real time, the traffic of thousands of individual international IP addresses. And while she will release that information to Mike Lindell for public release, she will not release it in its totality for others to analyze or identify where it came from, or if it is classified by a government agency, etc.
Yeah, that makes me suspicious. But if you buy it with no further questions, that's your business. If you ever find out anything differently, please let me know.
Posted on 2/15/21 at 5:09 pm to Annie Moss
If everything you say is true, this would imply that she is, by virtue of those contacts, revealing information that is obviously classified, if not HIGHLY classified.
She would not be the first journalist to do this, of course. But she would be one of the very few who has done this without attracting the interest of other mainstream media sources. What intelligence agencies knew about the JFK assassination, 9/11, and, ultimately, even Russiagate and the FBI's corrupt pursuit of Trump and several close advisers has never been of unilateral interest to conservative pundits only. Even the New York Times and Washington Post published confidential incriminating FBI documents as they were revealed.
So, thanks for your personal reference to the fictional Ms. Fanning's sterling character, but based on the questionable character of the ONLY publication in which I have seen her work displayed and the fact that I don't know you at ALL....at this point, I choose not to believe YOU either.
And I would re-emphasize the main point I made earlier -- any alleged fraudulent manipulation of an electronic vote tally would EXIST at the DIRECT CONTRADICTION OF the irrefutably compelling evidence of the actual number of LEGALLY VALID physical ballots cast. That evidence exists as we correspond. That evidence -- the number of ballots themselves -- either PROVES ELECTION FRAUD or it irrefutably DISPROVES ELECTION FRAUD (or at least that election fraud by hacked voting machines allegedly demonstrated by Ms. Fanning's spreadsheet).
There simply IS no more "impeccable source" than the complete universe of LEGALLY handmarked ballots in this election. Because while they may have been suspiciously COUNTED by SUSPECT MACHINES, they were marked and cast by the most reputable sources imaginable -- the voters.
She would not be the first journalist to do this, of course. But she would be one of the very few who has done this without attracting the interest of other mainstream media sources. What intelligence agencies knew about the JFK assassination, 9/11, and, ultimately, even Russiagate and the FBI's corrupt pursuit of Trump and several close advisers has never been of unilateral interest to conservative pundits only. Even the New York Times and Washington Post published confidential incriminating FBI documents as they were revealed.
So, thanks for your personal reference to the fictional Ms. Fanning's sterling character, but based on the questionable character of the ONLY publication in which I have seen her work displayed and the fact that I don't know you at ALL....at this point, I choose not to believe YOU either.
And I would re-emphasize the main point I made earlier -- any alleged fraudulent manipulation of an electronic vote tally would EXIST at the DIRECT CONTRADICTION OF the irrefutably compelling evidence of the actual number of LEGALLY VALID physical ballots cast. That evidence exists as we correspond. That evidence -- the number of ballots themselves -- either PROVES ELECTION FRAUD or it irrefutably DISPROVES ELECTION FRAUD (or at least that election fraud by hacked voting machines allegedly demonstrated by Ms. Fanning's spreadsheet).
There simply IS no more "impeccable source" than the complete universe of LEGALLY handmarked ballots in this election. Because while they may have been suspiciously COUNTED by SUSPECT MACHINES, they were marked and cast by the most reputable sources imaginable -- the voters.
Posted on 2/15/21 at 5:27 pm to LarryK
I'm suspicious of your recent registration and 3 posts in the Fanning thread, LarryK.
Posted on 2/15/21 at 5:29 pm to AndyCBR
quote:
Gee whiz I wonder who are all of these organic, spontaneous, and credible posters who are coming out of the woodwork joining the forum for the first time?
Shills?
These are the strangest week old thread bumps evah!
Posted on 2/15/21 at 5:30 pm to NineLineBind
I'm not saying ANY of those possible acts of fraud might not have happened. In fact, several of them are the ONLY REASONABLE THEORIES by which fraud COULD have occurred.
Most particularly, fake ballots COULD have been run through tabulators and/or the destruction of, say, Trump ballots would have had to have been precisely coordinated with those same fake runs in order to yield a finished result that would have stood the test of a recount or audit.
And, yes, local election officials, especially in places like Philly and Detroit and/or Fulton Co. Georgia might be susceptible to corrupting a ballot count. I think it is far less reasonable to believe such a conspiracy to reach up to the level of a Secretary of State or a Governor in ANY state, particularly of the same party of the victimized candidate. BUT... it is absurdly improbable to believe that a coordinated conspiracy at the highest elected levels could exist across party lines in no less than SIX KEY ELECTORAL STATES and MANAGED ON THE FLY ON ELECTION NIGHT AND IN THE DAYS FOLLOWING.
But if you somehow can get your head around and through all of those hoops....please tell me how this was all coordinated with Communist regimes in China and or Russia.
Most particularly, fake ballots COULD have been run through tabulators and/or the destruction of, say, Trump ballots would have had to have been precisely coordinated with those same fake runs in order to yield a finished result that would have stood the test of a recount or audit.
And, yes, local election officials, especially in places like Philly and Detroit and/or Fulton Co. Georgia might be susceptible to corrupting a ballot count. I think it is far less reasonable to believe such a conspiracy to reach up to the level of a Secretary of State or a Governor in ANY state, particularly of the same party of the victimized candidate. BUT... it is absurdly improbable to believe that a coordinated conspiracy at the highest elected levels could exist across party lines in no less than SIX KEY ELECTORAL STATES and MANAGED ON THE FLY ON ELECTION NIGHT AND IN THE DAYS FOLLOWING.
But if you somehow can get your head around and through all of those hoops....please tell me how this was all coordinated with Communist regimes in China and or Russia.
Posted on 2/15/21 at 5:32 pm to LarryK
quote:
The reason is because the alleged electronic fraud altering the vote tally in numerous, multi-state counties and individual precincts ONLY CHANGES THE NUMBERS ON A VIRTUAL TELEVISED SCOREBOARD THAT HAS ABSOLUTELY NO RELATIONSHIP TO THE BALLOTS THAT WERE ACTUALLY CAST AND WHICH PHYSICALLY REPRESENT THE TRUE VOTE TOTALS IN THE ELECTION.
So someone went to alot of trouble to change numbers on teevee and nowhere else.
You're an idiot.
Posted on 2/15/21 at 5:37 pm to Meauxjeaux
Like I said, I understand your suspicion. I landed here accidentally, and just want to respond to everyone who was kind enough to respond to me.
Fraud either happened or it didn't. I'm just giving the best evidence of my belief that IF IT HAPPENED, it was of nowhere near the extent many would have us believe and that precious little IF ANY of it occurred as a result of voting machines hacked over the internet. That specific theory is the one that makes the least amount of sense from the common sense perspective of it actually being successfully implemented.
Fraud either happened or it didn't. I'm just giving the best evidence of my belief that IF IT HAPPENED, it was of nowhere near the extent many would have us believe and that precious little IF ANY of it occurred as a result of voting machines hacked over the internet. That specific theory is the one that makes the least amount of sense from the common sense perspective of it actually being successfully implemented.
Posted on 2/15/21 at 5:53 pm to Meauxjeaux
I was trying to talk nice, but....if you don't know how those numbers appeared on and why they got changed on TV, then YOU are an idiot.
And if you think the conspirators were talented enough to produce the precise number of fake ballots while simultaneously destroying the precise number of valid Trump ballots in real time....but stupid enough not to be able to control the display of their deceit by CNN and all the other networks, then you at least have the satisfaction of knowing that those fools were even bigger idiots than you.
Somehow people believe in this MASSIVE INTERNATIONAL CONSPIRACY CHOREOGRAPHED BY FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS WITH PARTISAN DEMOCRAT AND EVEN REPUBLICAN NON-TRUMP SUPPORTERS.......and yet it was all brought down through a boneheaded error by the national BROADCAST of the very fraud that was being perpetuated.
Yeah. But I'M the one who's an idiot.....
And if you think the conspirators were talented enough to produce the precise number of fake ballots while simultaneously destroying the precise number of valid Trump ballots in real time....but stupid enough not to be able to control the display of their deceit by CNN and all the other networks, then you at least have the satisfaction of knowing that those fools were even bigger idiots than you.
Somehow people believe in this MASSIVE INTERNATIONAL CONSPIRACY CHOREOGRAPHED BY FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS WITH PARTISAN DEMOCRAT AND EVEN REPUBLICAN NON-TRUMP SUPPORTERS.......and yet it was all brought down through a boneheaded error by the national BROADCAST of the very fraud that was being perpetuated.
Yeah. But I'M the one who's an idiot.....
Posted on 2/15/21 at 6:02 pm to LarryK
quote:
audit.
And, yes, local election officials, especially in places like Philly and Detroit and/or Fulton Co. Georgia might be susceptible to corrupting a ballot count. I think it is far less reasonable to believe such a conspiracy to reach up to the level of a Secretary of State or a Governor in ANY state, particularly of the same party of the victimized candidate.
The name Kathy Bookvar ring a bell? She did an end-run around the PA legislature. It’s been discussed ad nauseum.
LINK
LINK
quote:
But if you somehow can get your head around and through all of those hoops....please tell me how this was all coordinated with Communist regimes in China and or Russia.
China runs or owns much our media, sports leagues, entertainment industry, and government officials. The WHO reports to China, and that’s who Fauci is sidled up to. Hell, China has a spy sleeping with one of the impeachment managers, Eric swallwell. The NBA defends their interests in China over those in the US. China has been infiltrating our country for 50 years. They are 50 years in to their 100 year plan. All of this is well known. It’s not a stretch to think this was coordinated by foreign sources.
Posted on 2/15/21 at 6:37 pm to LarryK
Of course you have every right to disbelieve what I've stated about Ms. Fanning. You're correct in that you don't know me. But after reading the conversation in this forum, I felt compelled to assure you that she is legit and well connected at the upper echelons.
She is not revealing classified information - it is all open source. She just knows where to find it, as she is pointed by those who guide her in the appropriate direction for her data. She is highly intelligent and has collaborated on a number of exposés with a former associate of mine.
I cannot reveal anything more about my relationship with her lest I endanger her identity. But I know for a fact that her sources include retired three and four-star patriots who have long been very concerned for our country for many years. Some of whom have written their own books about their concerns. I've said enough.
She is not revealing classified information - it is all open source. She just knows where to find it, as she is pointed by those who guide her in the appropriate direction for her data. She is highly intelligent and has collaborated on a number of exposés with a former associate of mine.
I cannot reveal anything more about my relationship with her lest I endanger her identity. But I know for a fact that her sources include retired three and four-star patriots who have long been very concerned for our country for many years. Some of whom have written their own books about their concerns. I've said enough.
Posted on 2/16/21 at 3:12 pm to MaryFanning
That's interesting, Larry has always seemed like a truth teller since the 9/11 days. But, I could see him being a gatekeeper.
Posted on 2/16/21 at 4:07 pm to LarryK
quote:
And I would re-emphasize the main point I made earlier -- any alleged fraudulent manipulation of an electronic vote tally would EXIST at the DIRECT CONTRADICTION OF the irrefutably compelling evidence of the actual number of LEGALLY VALID physical ballots cast. That evidence exists as we correspond. That evidence -- the number of ballots themselves -- either PROVES ELECTION FRAUD or it irrefutably DISPROVES ELECTION FRAUD (or at least that election fraud by hacked voting machines allegedly demonstrated by Ms. Fanning's spreadsheet).
I agree with your skepticism of the data and the conclusions. There are way too many unanswered questions to give it any credibility at this point.
But, your comment above simply isn't true. There's plenty of evidence (physical) of ballot stuffing after the fact and huge numbers of votes found very late. In other words, they could have easily retroactively created the necessary number of physical ballots to match the electronic votes cast.
Posted on 2/16/21 at 4:25 pm to MaryFanning
quote:
Mary Fanning’s work can be found at TheAmericanReport.org
Mary Fanning put together the storyboard and the SME subject matter experts for the video ABSOLUTE PROOF— all SME’s had first hand intel about the theft of the vote. Cybersecurity experts worked in concert to collect the intel since before during and after the election.
Attacks On Dennis Montgomery, HAMMER And SCORECARD, ‘Absolute Proof,’ Have CIA Connections
It's impossible to know what is true and what is fiction. You are suggesting that Dennis Montgomery is the source of Fanning's info.
A quick google of Montgomery shows his reputation is sketchy. Of course, your post indicates the CIA is behind that.
This is why details are necessary. As a poster, you could be a nutjob pushing a conspiracy theory. You could be someone bringing information to light like you pretend. You could be someone pretending to bring information to light by aligning Fanning with a known fraud.
None of it matters. Unless and until someone is willing to publish the source information, and publish the source and methods of those retrieving the information, it should not be believed.
Posted on 2/16/21 at 4:30 pm to LarryK
quote:
if you think the conspirators were talented enough to produce the precise number of fake ballots
Honestly, how do we know? The key counties across the swing states have denied access to the ballots. They have defied Senate orders and Court orders. What does that tell you?
I know what it tells me.
Posted on 2/16/21 at 6:37 pm to moneyg
Excellent post. But there are other ways to the truth than arbitrarily choosing whom to believe. Which is why I keep coming back to the actual legal votes cast. There is only ONE WAY for a voter who hand marked a ballot in favor of Donald Trump to have that vote "electronically hacked," and that is to have it electronically tabulated as a vote for Joe Biden. Now, yes, there are fraudulent ways of doing that. But any conspirator who does it enough times had better have the ability to physically DESTROY the actual number of LEGAL Trump BALLOTS he's MISCOUNTING AS Biden's while simultaneously having the ability to GENERATE the physical number of actual COUNTERFEIT Biden ballots to MATCH the fictional number of Biden votes he is INVENTING!!!
At least that is what you need to do if you have any hope of your fraud surviving a thorough recount or audit. If you don't have the ability to make ALL of those things happen, you a taking one hell of a stupid risk and apparently assuming that a recount will never take place by court order or that it will not be conducted honestly.
Now HOW IN GOD'S NAME could you make such stupid assumptions if you were a Chinese government official managing the theft of an election from an entire hemisphere away?? Are you sure you've hired enough reliable co-conspirators to produce and destroy the correct number of physical ballots in six separate swing states? Are you sure you've paid off all the tens of thousands of election officials in every county as well as State Governors and other elected officials AND, state, federal and Supreme Court justices??? REALLY????
Based on Mary Fanning's spreadsheet detailing the number of Trump votes that were changed, Mike Lindell believes Trump WON the election by 85 MILLION VOTES!!! If he and Fanning are correct, that would mean there are 85 million physical pieces of paper currently in storage that would prove it.
If conspiracy theorists can't make an adequate legal case through the state legislatures or the court system to physically produce and independently recount EVERY LAST ONE of those ballots there is absolutely no reason to believe this categorically insane accusation of what even Lindell would have correctly described as the "largest single cyber attack in our nation's history."
That either happened or it didn't. If it happened it needs to be proved by something far more convincing than a a bunch of numbers on reams of paper from an author whose entire journalistic history is traceable only to a crazed conspiracy website with connections to a documented con artist named Dennis Montgomery.
The LEGAL, HAND MARKED ballots exist. Bring them forth or shut the hell up.
At least that is what you need to do if you have any hope of your fraud surviving a thorough recount or audit. If you don't have the ability to make ALL of those things happen, you a taking one hell of a stupid risk and apparently assuming that a recount will never take place by court order or that it will not be conducted honestly.
Now HOW IN GOD'S NAME could you make such stupid assumptions if you were a Chinese government official managing the theft of an election from an entire hemisphere away?? Are you sure you've hired enough reliable co-conspirators to produce and destroy the correct number of physical ballots in six separate swing states? Are you sure you've paid off all the tens of thousands of election officials in every county as well as State Governors and other elected officials AND, state, federal and Supreme Court justices??? REALLY????
Based on Mary Fanning's spreadsheet detailing the number of Trump votes that were changed, Mike Lindell believes Trump WON the election by 85 MILLION VOTES!!! If he and Fanning are correct, that would mean there are 85 million physical pieces of paper currently in storage that would prove it.
If conspiracy theorists can't make an adequate legal case through the state legislatures or the court system to physically produce and independently recount EVERY LAST ONE of those ballots there is absolutely no reason to believe this categorically insane accusation of what even Lindell would have correctly described as the "largest single cyber attack in our nation's history."
That either happened or it didn't. If it happened it needs to be proved by something far more convincing than a a bunch of numbers on reams of paper from an author whose entire journalistic history is traceable only to a crazed conspiracy website with connections to a documented con artist named Dennis Montgomery.
The LEGAL, HAND MARKED ballots exist. Bring them forth or shut the hell up.
Page 4 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News