Started By
Message

What are Mary Fanning’s credentials and where did she get her data?

Posted on 2/6/21 at 2:23 pm
Posted by Wednesday
Member since Aug 2017
15420 posts
Posted on 2/6/21 at 2:23 pm
I watched most of Mike Lindell’s voting documentary - and most of it was info I’d heard before (it was presented to legislatures and ignored by Democrats and other varietals of Trump Haters).

I believe there was election fraud, and it was sufficient to alter the result, and make us stuck with Vice President Kamala. The six states all stopping their vote count at the same time. The Detroit Video just released and the Ruby Freeman video show fake ballots injected under suspicious circumstances, lead to no other conclusion but that something is rotten.

I believe that the computer systems were either monitored in the swing state urban areas so they knew how many fake mail in ballots to drop off in the middle of the night, or the votes were intended to be switched by computers in red areas just enough in red areas to have Trump lose the state but then he overrode them algorithm so they had to use the plan B fake ballots. I don’t know which of these it was - but you don’t have this problem without both computer issues and fake mail in ballots. I’m sorry- thousands of dead people and high school sophomores can’t cast legal ballots- but Stacy Abrams sure as shite can “register them to vote” and put them on a spread sheet, and give Ruby Freeman a bunch of scantrons filled out with their names and she can fill them in. If so, the voters on the ballots have no idea they “voted.”

All the witnesses Lindell interviewed basically showed opportunity to commit the crime existed in the machine, and the statistical anomalies that are not explained in any other way except ballot stuffing.

EXCEPT - Mary Fanning. Mary Fanning adds something new. I’ve followed this whole thing closely and had never heard anything like what she claimed. If you didn’t watch - Fanning had a spread sheet listing the state computers/tabulators, a remote computer accessing the state computer/tabulator, which ones tried to access the state computer, which ones succeeded and how many votes were flipped. Lindell is correct, this is absolute proof- but ONLY IF Fanning’s data came from the machines she said it does.

Lindell missed an opportunity to explain where she got her into, and bc he didn’t, his video isn’t changing any minds. Hell. She didn’t even FaceTime him like his other “guests.”

I love Mike Lindell. I don’t think he’s crazy or dishonest. But what about Mary Fanning. I don’t know the first thing about her. I think that the conclusions Fanning presented aren’t believable unless we know where she got the info.

Does anyone know 1) what this woman’s credentials are; and 2) how she (or Lindell) verified the data on her spreadsheet. Do any of you have any idea? Please chime in, if so.

(And yes I realize Joe Biden is the President*. He’ll be President with an asterisk until this is fully investigated. If we find answers, he’ll still be President* but that doesn’t mean we don’t deserve the answers. If we don’t get them, nobody will ever trust election results again. And that is untenable).
This post was edited on 2/6/21 at 3:25 pm
Posted by GhostOfFreedom
Member since Jan 2021
11711 posts
Posted on 2/6/21 at 2:50 pm to
Why not remove Biden and Kamala, if the proof becomes absolute and undeniable and the courts rule on it? They have removed other fraudulent politicians. What makes the presidency so special?

I think we need a complete revote of all up and down elections across the nation and w/o Dominion/Smartmatic and other questionable equipment and have the National guard at every voting location. NO MAILINS.

Posted by NineLineBind
LA....no, the other one
Member since May 2020
6914 posts
Posted on 2/6/21 at 2:50 pm to
Link to book

Small correction - her last name is Fanning. Apparently she is an investigative reporter/author. I would like to know where she got the data also.
Posted by Trevaylin
south texas
Member since Feb 2019
5909 posts
Posted on 2/6/21 at 2:52 pm to



I believe earlier in the program it was mentioned that in the 2016, 2018 elections the foreign meddling was observed by a Dallas private company who's effort to bring the issue to fbi/election commissions was ignored. Based on that data, an app was generated to trap the information shown. I have seen the spread sheet several weeks ago but have never seen attribution for the development.

the spread sheets themselves likely total several million reality based data points, that can be verified by simply using the ip data address to check origin and endpoint. The sheer size of the spread sheet data base leads me to believe its real. there is just too much effort for it to be a decoy.

biden is not my president. he is just a front man for the cabal described bt the Times article
Posted by AlwysATgr
Member since Apr 2008
16453 posts
Posted on 2/6/21 at 2:59 pm to
quote:

Why not remove Biden and Kamala, if the proof becomes absolute and undeniable 


Remove is too lenient, jus' sayin'.
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
30122 posts
Posted on 2/6/21 at 3:00 pm to
A whistleblower perhaps?
Posted by ljhog
Lake Jackson, Tx.
Member since Apr 2009
19068 posts
Posted on 2/6/21 at 3:03 pm to
quote:

Remove is too lenient, jus' sayin'.

Yep. Way too lenient.
Posted by GhostOfFreedom
Member since Jan 2021
11711 posts
Posted on 2/6/21 at 3:09 pm to
The interview Lindell gave today looked like he was at a golf course. Mar-o-largo?

Maybe, Mary Flannagan got the information directly from the military?

Posted by Wednesday
Member since Aug 2017
15420 posts
Posted on 2/6/21 at 3:16 pm to
quote:

Why not remove Biden and Kamala, if the proof becomes absolute and undeniable and the courts rule on it? They have removed other fraudulent politicians. What makes the presidency so special?


I think that if they were complicit (and let’s be honest - if you believe it happened you believe they were complicit) and proof of their complicity were developed- that would be an impeachable offense- for both of them. So yes, in that sense they are removable as a penalty - but that wouldn’t happen automatically.

If true evidence were established in a court case, there is nothing in the constitution that would allow a court to remove them.

For fraud to result in removal we would need a congressional investigation, BC congress has thr power to impeach: That ain’t happening in advance of the 2022 Midterms. So, the best we could hope for is an investigation by a state legislature or state court with real evidence and testimony to expose the fraud to the public.

This could happen (particularly in Az bc their legislature is fuming pissed and has not backed down). The election system needs to be corrected: if it is, an elected congress could impeach both Joe and the Ho. There’s no way any Democrat in congress is honest enough to impeach and then remove those 2 frauds from office/ further - half of them are probably in on it (with a few RINOs thrown in)
This post was edited on 2/6/21 at 3:18 pm
Posted by idlewatcher
County Jail
Member since Jan 2012
79168 posts
Posted on 2/6/21 at 3:19 pm to
How can seemingly randos just plug into the state tabulators? Is it open to the public? Are special credentials required?

And most importantly, how is none of this on video? One would think that if fraud did indeed occur (it did), then there would be real time video of the actual vote swaps. Merely saying it VS showing it makes the case IMHO
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
30122 posts
Posted on 2/6/21 at 3:22 pm to
quote:

How can seemingly randos just plug into the state tabulators? Is it open to the public? Are special credentials required?

Wouldn't one perhaps assume that those particular parties could in all likelihood be complicit? I.e. a fully coordinated effort? I think it's either that or nothing. All or nothing.
Posted by Wednesday
Member since Aug 2017
15420 posts
Posted on 2/6/21 at 3:23 pm to
In other words - If Mary has some explanation of where and how she developed that data- that would be irrefutable proof in my mind.

I agree with one of the other posters that the sheer volume of info makes it difficult to believe that it was some kind of fraud- but still, I would like to hear more about that before I call it irrefutable.

If it becomes explained, you still need some kind of legal process to get Joe and the Ho out - and the only one I see available is Impeachment: Mary’s evidence is the kind of thing that would make that happen- but she’s gotta validate it for it to be acceptable in a court or to the public
Posted by Wednesday
Member since Aug 2017
15420 posts
Posted on 2/6/21 at 3:23 pm to
quote:

her last name is Fanning


Will update
Posted by Wednesday
Member since Aug 2017
15420 posts
Posted on 2/6/21 at 3:30 pm to
quote:

How can seemingly randos just plug into the state tabulators? Is it open to the public? Are special credentials required?

And most importantly, how is none of this on video? One would think that if fraud did indeed occur (it did), then there would be real time video of the actual vote swaps. Merely saying it VS showing it makes the case IMHO


Randos can plug into the tabulators thru the Internet. The systems are demonstrably insecure.

I don’t think they’re trying to say there was some kind of readout when the paper ballots went in; I think the theory is that the data was fed in, manipulated either by software installed remotely or manipulated on another machine remotely and then dumped back in in a swapped format with no way to know what the data said or showed before alterations
Posted by obdobd918
Member since Jun 2020
3228 posts
Posted on 2/6/21 at 3:31 pm to
quote:

How can seemingly randos just plug into the state tabulators? Is it open to the public? Are special credentials required?

And most importantly, how is none of this on video? One would think that if fraud did indeed occur (it did), then there would be real time video of the actual vote swaps. Merely saying it VS showing it makes the case IMHO


What was supposed to be on video that would show votes changing? IT seems they claim the USB would be uploaded, and other entities would change the votes uploaded from the USB drives. It has been verified that there is no trail for the USB drives; that is, the local precinct does not write down the vote count from the USB drive.

This needs to change. The USB drive goes from the precinct, to some place, then some other place. Each place should be required to write down the count on the USB drives, but repubs and dems must be present at each location. This way when it gets to the SOS, they can verify the totals. If the totals are uploaded, they would know if the totals were changed electronically.

All votes should be totaled at the precinct level. No county should count votes in a large room with votes from multiple precincts. This allows people to control these large places, and do whatever they want with the votes.
Everyone says count every vote. Every legal vote must be counted, and ballots added to the total after the election is over should not be counted.
Posted by Swazla
Member since Jul 2016
1447 posts
Posted on 2/6/21 at 3:49 pm to
Mary Fanning

The American Report in SO Much!

Benghazi, CIA, HAMR

Can't copy and paste. Content is protected. But she know so much it appears.
Posted by jp4lsu
Member since Sep 2016
4973 posts
Posted on 2/6/21 at 3:54 pm to
I spot checked some of the IP addresses that were listed as the destination.

A couple of them in MI were to the local government location. Several that hat the target listed in Fulton or Dekalb County, the IP address was in Kansas through a server farm or something. One was Cloudflare.

I would like to know where the Data came from. So I am not sure how it was collected or or if the counties were storying data on 3rd party servers. I'm not technical enough to know how it is possible to collect data
Posted by LSUbest
Coastal Plain
Member since Aug 2007
11127 posts
Posted on 2/6/21 at 3:55 pm to
I cant answer your questions, however I reviewed the data and ran IP lookups on some of the IP addresses.
The chart appears to be very likely to be accurate.

The source IPs could have been bounced.
i.e. A hacker in Seattle could have accessed a computer in China and used that PC to commit the attack.
Very unlikely for a single instance unless it was a government sponsored hacker.

The source ID AKA: mac address is easily falsified.

Considering the number of intrusions it appears that we suffered a D-day type invasion.

I am frankly surprised that China did not use North Korea to perform the assault.
North Korea has been hacking the US for over a decade.
In my experience they are responsible for about 97% of hacking activity in the US.
Posted by Topisawtiger
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2012
3493 posts
Posted on 2/6/21 at 3:57 pm to
quote:


If true evidence were established in a court case, there is nothing in the constitution that would allow a court to remove them.


But is there anything in the constitution that prohibits a court from removing them is the bigger question. I don't think so.
Posted by 1BIGTigerFan
100,000 posts
Member since Jan 2007
49169 posts
Posted on 2/6/21 at 3:59 pm to
quote:

How can seemingly randos just plug into the state tabulators?

I think true "hackers" know how to get into anything.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram