- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Weissman: we found sufficient evidence trump committed a crime
Posted on 9/21/20 at 12:49 pm
Posted on 9/21/20 at 12:49 pm
quote:
Carol Leonnig
@CarolLeonnig
NEW >>> Mueller team found sufficient evidence that Trump committed a crime, enough to charge him if he wasn't a sitting president. Prosecutor is still "flummoxed" that Mueller would not * just say it * in his report.
LINK
Lol
41
Posted on 9/21/20 at 12:50 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
It's like deja vu all over again
Posted on 9/21/20 at 12:51 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Guess you'll just have to wait.
Posted on 9/21/20 at 12:52 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Wheres your 27 phone bruh
Posted on 9/21/20 at 12:52 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
Prosecutor is still "flummoxed" that Mueller would not * just say it * in his report.
Given Mueller was just a doddering old fool whose name was lent to the investigation that Weissmann ran, whose fault is it really, Andrew?
Posted on 9/21/20 at 12:52 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Weissman was born flummoxed. He will die flummoxed. In between are moments of confusion, greed (for power), and avarice.
he can eat a never ending bag of dicks in hell.
he can eat a never ending bag of dicks in hell.
Posted on 9/21/20 at 12:52 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Posted on 9/21/20 at 12:52 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Say what you want about these guys. They don't give up very easily.
They also don't know when to take an L.
They also don't know when to take an L.
Posted on 9/21/20 at 12:52 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
they truly live in an alternate reality.
Posted on 9/21/20 at 12:53 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
All psychos aboard the merry-go-round again!
Posted on 9/21/20 at 12:53 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Was the crime in Russia
Posted on 9/21/20 at 12:53 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Well the crime was Trump beat Hillary. Weissman lost money.
Posted on 9/21/20 at 12:53 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Clown show
Posted on 9/21/20 at 12:54 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Per page 9 of part II of the Mueller Report, in order to be found guilty of obstruction of justice, the prosecution must show:
1) there was an obstructive act
2) there was a connection between the obstructive act and an official proceeding, and
3) corrupt intent.
The Report states that the evidence they obtained did not establish that Trump was involved in an underlying crime related to Russian election interference (Part II, page 7), and “the absence of that evidence affects the analysis of the President’s intent and requires consideration of other possible motives for his conduct.”
There was no underlying crime. There was no clear “corrupt intent.” Therefore, even if I give you there was at least one “obstructive act,” you still have to prove corrupt intent and with no evidence of any underlying crime what is the corrupt intent?
The requirement of “corrupt intent” for obstruction of justice is essential, and this situation perfectly illustrates why it is essential. Trump spent a year and a half relentlessly working for the Presidency, and was justified to be pissed at anyone around him who allowed the “Russia cloud,” without any evidentiary basis, to hang over his Presidency. An innocent man facing unjust prosecution has the god given right to fight back. Certain acts in “fighting back” may qualify as an “obstructive act,” but if there is no corrupt intent then those “obstructive acts” are 100% legal!
1) there was an obstructive act
2) there was a connection between the obstructive act and an official proceeding, and
3) corrupt intent.
The Report states that the evidence they obtained did not establish that Trump was involved in an underlying crime related to Russian election interference (Part II, page 7), and “the absence of that evidence affects the analysis of the President’s intent and requires consideration of other possible motives for his conduct.”
There was no underlying crime. There was no clear “corrupt intent.” Therefore, even if I give you there was at least one “obstructive act,” you still have to prove corrupt intent and with no evidence of any underlying crime what is the corrupt intent?
The requirement of “corrupt intent” for obstruction of justice is essential, and this situation perfectly illustrates why it is essential. Trump spent a year and a half relentlessly working for the Presidency, and was justified to be pissed at anyone around him who allowed the “Russia cloud,” without any evidentiary basis, to hang over his Presidency. An innocent man facing unjust prosecution has the god given right to fight back. Certain acts in “fighting back” may qualify as an “obstructive act,” but if there is no corrupt intent then those “obstructive acts” are 100% legal!
Posted on 9/21/20 at 12:54 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
I have found from multiple records and accounts that Weismann has forged, and misled the courts on factual findings
Posted on 9/21/20 at 12:54 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Adam Schiff jumping on that bandwagon in 3... 2...
Posted on 9/21/20 at 12:59 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Is this the start of peachment 2.0 like Nancy said?
Posted on 9/21/20 at 1:00 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
The only way to stop them is to put them in jail or kill them.
Posted on 9/21/20 at 1:01 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
I read about it, It all hedges on a theory about a dinner date Manafort had with Constantin Klimnik in 2016
Rick Gates was there and debunked the theory
Rick Gates was there and debunked the theory
Posted on 9/21/20 at 1:03 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Weissmann and lying, name a better duo.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News